❌

Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdayMain stream

Meet the 2026 Ig Nobel Prize winners

3 September 2026 at 13:00

It's that time of year again, when we learn which lucky scientists are among the winners of the Ig Nobel Prizes. This year, the prizes honor research on designing the perfect splash-free urinal; using mosquito proboscises to "necroprint" tiny nozzles; studying composition rates of buried cotton underwear; and the aerodynamics of a healthy nose-blow, among other highlights.

Established in 1991, the Ig Nobels are a good-natured parody of the Nobel Prizes; they honor β€œachievements that first make people laugh and then make them think.” The unapologetically campy awards ceremony features miniature operas, scientific demos, and "24/7 lectures," whereby experts must explain their work twice: once in 24 seconds and the second in just seven words.

Acceptance speeches are limited to 60 seconds. And as the motto implies, the research being honored might seem ridiculous at first glance, but that doesn’t mean it’s devoid of scientific merit.Β In the weeks following the ceremony, the winners will also give free public talks, which will be posted on the Improbable Research website.

Read full article

Comments

Β© YouTube/Improbable Research

Psychiatry’s diagnostic bible is finally getting a biological upgrade

The β€œbible” of clinical psychiatryβ€”the DSM, short for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disordersβ€”is one of the most popular psychiatry reference books around the world. Clinicians use it to diagnose patients and scientists use it to guide research.

Despite its wide impact, the DSM has never integrated biology in its diagnoses of mental illness. This omission was largely because the underlying biology of mental illness was too preliminary to be included in such a widely used clinical manual.

The most recent version of the DSMβ€”the DSM-5, released in 2013β€”has attracted significant criticism from clinicians and researchers, including on how its lack of objective biological measures risks medicalizing human suffering and reducing the validity of psychiatric diagnoses.

Read full article

Comments

Β© Galina Zhigalova/Getty

❌
❌