Welcome back, investigators!

Some things just lie on the surface, while others take time to find. In OSINT, finding the right data often means digging deep. Before you reach a conclusion, there must be solid evidence to support it, and data acquisition is always the most time consuming part of this process. The success of your investigation depends on how well you can find information and connect the dots.

OpenPlanter can automate part of this process. 

OpenPlanter

Essentially, OpenPlanter is a recursive language model investigation agent. It ingests different kinds of data, which can be corporate registries, campaign finance records, government contracts and more. It then resolves entities across them and surfaces connections through evidence-based analysis. You can also use it to build profiles of individuals based on publicly available information.

OpenPlanter has both a desktop GUI and a terminal interface. The second one is more convenient.

Setting Up

The setup process is quick. We just need to create a Python environment that will host the needed libraries. 

kali > git clone https://github.com/ShinMegamiBoson/OpenPlanter.git
kali > cd OpenPlanter
kali > python3 -m venv venv; source venv/bin/activate
kali > pip install -e . 

Once it’s done, we need to give it our API keys. 

To make web searches, OpenPlanter needs the Exa API. Exa is cheap to use and gives free credits for new accounts, so you don’t have to pay upfront. OpenRouter API is also needed to run the tool. OpenRouter has free AI models, but there is a daily usage limit. Make an account there and get your free API key. 

To configure keys, run this command and paste them: 

kali > openplanter-agent --configure-keys

At this point, you can use the tool.

Using OpenPlanter with OpenRouter

The daily API usage limit is enough to run a couple of basic tests, like the one below.

kali > openplanter-agent --task “Find recent security breaches affecting Apple” --provider openrouter --model openrouter/free

OpenPlanter will use Exa API key to find information. Without Exa, it burns tokens faster and gives incomplete results. 

Normally, the tool saves the results in a text file in the current directory, but it doesn’t always happen. Be careful and make sure you don’t lose anything. 

Here is our first report.

To make things more interesting, we asked it to find a complete list of Tatneft executives. Tatneft is one of the largest oil and gas companies in Russia.

The report was well organized, but all this information is readily available on the internet, due to the size of the Russian company. 

When it was asked to find more information on a specific person from the list above, it struggled to find much and ended up with some generic data and a wrong social media account. Well, maybe that person is hard to find, so we gave it a second chance and picked a unique name from the same list: Nail Ulfatovich Maganov.

kali > openplanter-agent --task "Find as much information as you can on Nail Ulfatovich Maganov who works at Tatneft. If possible, find his Vkontakte, phone number, address, email and check if his email has been in data leaks. Save the results in a text file" --provider openrouter --model openrouter/free

The results can be seen below. OpenPlanter did find his LinkedIn account and extracted information from various places. 

It also found OpenSanctions records associated with Nail Maganov. 

But he is a well known figure in Russia. What about regular employees at a large Russian company? We will use Sibur for this example. Founded in 1995, it’s Russia’s largest petrochemical company.

We tried two individuals. During the first attempt, the tool didn’t find the correct person. After the second attempt with a different employee, it gave the results. 

It found Svetlana’s position (Head of HR). This information was in her LinkedIn account. The rest of the information deserves further validation. Keep in mind, Russia has undergone a massive data blackout, systematically dismantling its open data and public statistics infrastructure. No wonder it’s hard to find things there.

Using OpenPlanter with Ollama – Locally

OpenPlanter’s own docs push toward frontier models (GPT-5.2, Claude Opus 4.6, Cerebras Qwen3-235B), because the whole process is quite demanding. Small local models will be noticeably weaker. But we still gave it a try. The first model was Qwen3:0.6B and its first attempt didn’t produce any results. After the second attempt, it found recent vulnerabilities that Windows had.

We also tried it with Qwen3:4b, but it produced absolutely irrelevant data in its response. 

We didn’t stop here and tried it again. The results were still irrelevant. Instead of making a report on Mikhail Karisalov (CEO of Sibur) it spoke about something else. 

Using OpenPlanter with Ollama – Remote Servers

If you decide to rent a server with good hardware to test other models, don’t waste your time on it. We tried various models, but none of them worked well. OpenPlanter calls a model, the model replies and then it fails. The output can be seen on the screen.

Here is an example with Qwen3.6:27b. Qwen3.6:35b had the same issue.

We also tried Ornith:35B.

These models support thinking and tooling, but they can’t really do much in this case. 

Terminal Interface

It’s also important to mention that there are two ways you can use OpenPlanter in the terminal. So far, you’ve seen only one. If you’re more comfortable with a chat interface, you can use the second option.

kali > openplanter-agent --provider openrouter --model openrouter/free

Here you run your prompts and tweak the tool using the available commands.

Summary

After testing the tool in various ways, we came to the conclusion that it works reliably only with OpenRouter. That’s what gave us the best results. The developers also push towards frontier models or OpenRouter. The whole process of investigation relies heavily on the Exa API. Using it with Ollama models hosted externally (VPS) will not work, as it fails silently even if you select a supported AI model. 

The tool might confuse people, especially if their names are common and their social media profiles are empty. Everything it finds deserves validation. Occasionally, it may check the results, marking them HIGH, MEDIUM or LOW depending on its confidence. It doesn’t always do it, but this can be fixed if the prompt explicitly asks for it. Most importantly, OpenPlanter can still save you time.

Learn more with our AI for Cybersecurity training. During the training, we’ll show you different ways of using AI in cybersecurity, set up local models and solve tasks with it.

The post Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity, Part 26: OpenPlanter for OSINT Investigations first appeared on Hackers Arise.

Welcome back, my aspiring cyberwarriors!

Many aspiring cyberwarriors write to me asking where they should start in artificial intelligence for cybersecurity and the answer is simple, Hackers-Arise! We have dozens of tutorials–and now classes– on how to apply AI to cybersecurity. In addition, we are the sponsor of the upcoming Wittgenstein Award for the best AI cybersecurity agents. This will give our students an inside look at the development of the best of the best in AI cybersecurity as our students will have an opportunity participate and use the models and agents we develop.

Beyond learning AI for cybersecurity, there is another issue. There are many platforms, models, and hardware to choose from. Comparable to Cisco at the advent of internet in the 1990’s, those who hitched their wagon to Cisco found themselves in an advantageous position regarding jobs and promotions. I want to make the case that NVIDIA is the company you should be hitching your wagon to in this new era.

As you know, NVIDIA is the most valuable company in the world! It is rapidly growing an eco-system that will exceed that of Apple and Cisco. They have quietly built an eco-system of AI that will make it very hard to dislodge them from this dominant position. Jensen Huang and NVIDIA are building an almost impenetrable wall around their eco-system assuring it will be here for years to come.

NVIDIA began as a start-up 1993 building graphics processing units (GPU) for PC gamers. Processing pixels for any graphics intensive product is very compute intensive and NVIDIA made those games come alive. Graphics processing is compute intensive as every image is made of millions of tiny polygons that the GPU must compute it’s size, color, and movement. This means crunching a vast amount of data and Jensen Huang and his colleagues developed a graphics card capable of doing all those calculations very fast through massive parallelism. GPU’s have thousands of cores capable of doing these calculations serially and simultaneously. That is the magic of NVIDIA GPU’s and it is what makes NVIDIA GPU’s the preferred chip for AI. Neural networks–the foundation of our LLM’s at this moment– are built almost entirely from matrix multiplications. This means that the same calculation needs to run over and over on different data. The NVIDIA GPU is uniquely designed for this.

Now let’s take a look at the NVIDIA eco-system that Jensen Huang is building in AI.

Major Equity Investments / Strategic Partnerships

Jensen Huang has made numerous investments in companies positioned to benefit from the coming age of AI, including:

Mellonox –in 2019 NVIDIA agrred to buy Mellanox, an Israeli maker of high-speed Infiniband and Ethernet interconnects for $6.9 billion. NVIDIA needed faster interconnects between to communicate to and from it’s super fast GPU’s and other hardware and Mellanox provided that.

ARM— the British chip designer was the next firm in NVIDIA’s cross-hairs. Jensen Huand recognized that needed powerful and efficient CPU’s to manage his systems. ARM designs RISC-based CPU’s that power the mobile world due to their unique combination of speed and efficiency. NVIDIA offered $40 billion to purchase ARM for what Huang called “the world’s premier computing company for the age of AI.” The US FTC sued to block the acquisition and NVIDIA dropped it’s pursuit of owning ARM. Instead, it holds ARM and it’s CPU’s in close partnership integrating their CPU’s in a multitude of products. Interestingly, ARM is now worth about $250 billion, 6x what Huang offered for it just 6 years ago.

OpenAI — NVIDIA and OpenAI announced a letter of intent to deploy at least 10 gigawatts of NVIDIA systems, with NVIDIA intending to invest up to $100 billion in OpenAI progressively as each gigawatt is deployed. Earlier in 2026, OpenAI raised $110 billion at a $730 billion pre-money valuation, with NVIDIA and SoftBank each investing $30 billion and Amazon investing $50 billion. NVIDIA also noted in its 10-K ( a type of disclosure required by US regulators at the SEC) that it’s finalizing an investment and partnership agreement with OpenAI, though there’s no assurance the transaction will be completed.

Anthropic — NVIDIA and Anthropic announced a deep technology partnership to optimize Claude models for NVIDIA architecture and vice versa; Anthropic’s Series H in May 2026 raised $65 billion at a $965 billion post-money valuation, making it one of NVIDIA’s two largest single-company bets alongside OpenAI.

CoreWeave — NVIDIA holds a stake with an original 7% stake (24.2 million shares) worth roughly $2 billion at IPO, plus an additional $2 billion investment in early 2026, on top of a prior $6.3 billion agreement to purchase CoreWeave’s unused computing capacity through 2032.

xAI — A structure of $7.5 billion in equity plus $12.5 billion in debt, largely through a special purpose vehicle for GPU purchases, supporting xAI’s Colossus 2 data center in Memphis.

Hugging Face — A pending acquisition-related investment of $12.9 billion.

Mistral AI — NVIDIA remains an investor alongside lead backer ASML, with Mistral valued at €11.7 billion (about $13.8 billion).

AI Infrastructure Financing

In August of this year (2026), NVIDIA announced a partnership with some of the largest financial firms in the world including Apollo, BlackRock, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs, and KKR. This partnership was designed to facilitate financing of AI infrastructure and, of course, NVIDIA GPU’s.

Venture / Ecosystem Programs

A roughly £2 billion (~$2.6 billion) UK commitment flowing through partner VCs — Accel, Air Street Capital, Balderton, Hoxton Ventures, and Phoenix Court — into startups in London, Oxford, Cambridge, and Manchester.

Similar “VC Alliance” partnerships extended to European firms including Accel, Elaia, Partech, and Sofinnova, offering DGX Cloud Lepton marketplace credits to portfolio companies.

Scale

NVIDIA has committed over $50 billion across AI labs, cloud services, data centers, and optical communications, with private company assets reaching $47.9 billion by July 2026 and about $18 billion in equity commitments still to be executed.

This list isn’t exhaustive — NVIDIA also has long-standing commercial partnerships with cloud providers (AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle), automakers, and chip/hardware partners that function differently from these financial stakes. Let me know if you’d like me to dig into any particular category.

Summary

NVIDIA and Jensen Huang have quietly built an almost impenetrable eco-system of artificial intelligence systems through acquisitions, partnerships, and financing. Similar to the eco-system CISCO built with networking equipment at the advent of the Internet, it will be advantageous to become part of this eco-system as it will likely be dominant for the foreseeable future.

The post The NVIDIA AI Ecosystem: A Quick Guide first appeared on Hackers Arise.

Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!

Sometimes you might run the same model twice and get different results. That often happens when you’ve upgraded it with skills. Skills are detailed text documents that lay out the tools the model should use, the approach it should take and how it should analyze the results. Good skills are practical, pulled from actual reports on HackerOne and other bug bounty platforms. A model can still lean on its own knowledge, but that’s just less efficient.

There are plenty of skills out there you might come across, but not everything can be trusted. Some skills can simply be dangerous and infect your system. To make sure they are safe, you can check them with SkillSpector by NVIDIA, so you don’t end up with anything malicious on your system.

Bug Bounty Skills

Both of these repositories do bug bounty hunting end to end, but they go about it in almost opposite ways.

The first is called Bountyforge. It’s actually just one single skill file, but it’s smart enough to split itself into eight different mini agents that all work at the same time. One looks at websites and apps, another at crypto and blockchain, others go after different angles hackers can exploit. It also checks each finding with four different tests to make sure it’s not a false alarm. Then you get a report in whatever format the bug bounty program wants.

You don’t even need Claude Code or any other coding tool for this, you can just run it right inside the regular Claude website in your browser.

The second bug bounty repository is Claude-BugHunter. It takes the opposite approach. The repo has 83 skills and almost half of those were built by studying 681 real bug reports that people actually got paid for on HackerOne. These skills aren’t locked to Claude Code either, you can use OpenCode, Codex or Hermes Agents with them.

Here are a few examples of the results we got with these skills.

API endpoints are often vulnerable and this is worth trying your luck on to see how it goes.

Another approach can be APK reverse engineering. Here we found a hardcoded RSA-2048 signing private key baked into the published APK. With that key, hackers can push a new app to the app store and infect every employee phone, getting access not just to the WiFi network at the workplace but to their personal life too. Quite dangerous.

We found an API endpoint vulnerable to an SQL injection and managed to pull the entire database.

Having skills built on real attacks keeps the model from wandering off into its own weird approaches and missing a lot of good findings. 

Active Directory Skills

Claude-AD was made by ADScanPro for testing a company’s internal network. It gives your model a playbook with skills and agents built for an Active Directory assessment. The developers are upfront that it’s not an auto pwn tool. It’s meant to guide you through the assessment. Every finding can get mapped to a compliance control (DORA, NIS2 and ENS).

Claude-AD is very careful about getting caught too. It explains what a security team would actually see on their end if that technique got used. And any time it’s about to do something that would actually change things on the company’s network, it stops and asks for confirmation first.

General Cybersecurity Skills

Antropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is basically a giant reference book. It has 817 skills covering 29 areas of security work, cloud security, malware analysis, all the way down to hardware and firmware. Each skill is its own small file, so your agent will quickly pull out the two or three it actually needs for its task.

Every skill ties back to real security frameworks that companies and auditors already use (NIST CSF, MITRE ATT&CK and so on). So if your model finds a problem using one of these skills, it can also tell you exactly which official standard it violates. You can use it to justify findings to a compliance team.

SCADA Skills

On an industrial network, a clumsy scan can shut down a production line or damage physical equipment, since a lot of this gear is old and wasn’t built to handle unexpected traffic. That’s why the ICS skill by Masriyan is built to never actively touch a live industrial network. Instead, it works off network captures someone already took. It reads the file, recognizes industrial protocols by the ports they normally run on (Modbus, DNP3, Siemens S7, EtherNet/IP, OPC-UA, and more) and counts which devices are talking to each other. It then shows you write commands, these are the ones that change a value on an industrial device. That’s the traffic you want to see first.

The second mode skips network captures and instead searches for exposed industrial equipment using Shodan and Censys. The skill can also help your model reason about how an industrial network is laid out and check findings against MITRE’s ICS specific attack framework and the IEC 62443 security standard.

Science Skills

Although science isn’t really what we want to focus on here, in one of our SCADA articles we mentioned that to carry out a successful attack requires hackers to understand the technical process of the plant. That means understanding how the chemicals are produced and which units are used along the way. We also showed how vinyl acetate is produced and talked about paracetamol production.

1 kg of paracetamol at 100% purity was reported to cost €8,205, while 1 kg at 99% purity cost just €5. So even a single day of sabotage could cause serious financial damage to an enterprise.

Finding a scientist among hackers is quite a challenge, which is why Stuxnet needed a group of people from different backgrounds working toward one objective. But now hackers can just import different skills to make their attacks more devastating. K-Dense published 140 skills with access to different scientific databases and Python tools.

The real concern here isn’t ICS exploits inside the repository, there aren’t any. It’s the access to sensitive scientific data paired with an AI agent that can actually understand that data and change it.

Summary

AI skills can be a gamechanger, especially when they’re based on actual reports hackers got paid for. These skills show your model how to approach things and what tools to use during the test, so it doesn’t wander off hallucinating and inventing its own ways of testing things. That can wreck your bug bounty flow, since you’ll end up overlooking plenty of potential targets.

Simply relying on the AI to find things isn’t enough, hunters that do it keep getting a lot of dupes. You need to test things manually too. For this reason we created our Bug Bounty training to show you how to find bugs and work with the AI more efficiently.

The post Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Cybersecurity, Part 25: Upgrading Your Model with Specific Skillset first appeared on Hackers Arise.

Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!

Every OSINT investigator now has access to a large language model on their desktop. This tool can quickly summarize thousands of pages or organize chaotic names and dates into a clear timeline. And this is widely accepted. But the difference between an investigator who gets useful results and one who gathers unhelpful information lies not in the model they use, but in how they interact with it.

This article explains how to create prompts that improve your OSINT work. It draws on recent academic research about prompting strategies for security tasks and insights from experienced OSINT practitioners. Let’s get rolling!

Prompt Is More Important Than the Model

Recent research on large language models in offensive security tasks highlights an important point. Methods that relied on reasoning, such as few-shot and chain-of-thought prompting, produced better results. These methods generated code that closely matched the reference examples, executed correctly, and handled various situations well.

One surprising finding was that continuously refining a prompt or asking the model to rethink its answer often resulted in worse outcomes. This happened because rephrasing the prompt misinterpreted the original task and lowered the accuracy of the output. So, repeatedly saying “try again” or “are you sure” is not an effective debugging strategy. If your first prompt was unclear, it is better to follow up with a clear and structured prompt rather than trying to steer the model to a better answer afterward.

Focus on crafting clear instructions at the beginning.

Create a Master Prompt Before You Begin

Before discussing a specific OSINT case, it’s a good practice to create a master prompt. This set of rules, though not related to the target, guides how the model should perform during the session.

This approach uses a well-known idea called anchoring. The first instructions you give to a model have a big influence on all the following interactions. If your first message includes a leading assumption, the model will consider that assumption important for the rest of the conversation, even if you didn’t mean for it to be.

A strong master prompt might look something like this.

Act as a neutral OSINT analyst. Do not treat any hypothesis as proven. Separate facts, indicators, assumptions, and conclusions. Look for evidence against a theory as actively as evidence for it. If the available data is insufficient, say so directly instead of filling the gap.

In other words, this is the initial set of instructions that the AI will follow throughout the entire time you’re working on the task. This reduces the number of errors because it explains to the model in advance exactly how to proceed and which rules to follow.

Basically, a master prompt should specify:

the role;

the goal of the task;

neutrality;

verification rules;

the response format;

a prohibition on unconfirmed conclusions and fabrications;

a requirement to distinguish facts from hypotheses;

a requirement to indicate what is missing.

And then you can set a specific task: what you’re looking for, who you’re looking for, what time period you’re covering, what sources you already have, and so on.

Ask Neutrally

One important but often overlooked issue in AI-assisted open-source intelligence is sycophancy. This happens when a model tends to agree with what the user already believes. For example, if you ask, “prove that this person is connected to this company,” the model starts with the answer you want before it even begins its search. It will look for information that confirms your belief simply because that’s what you asked for.

To fix this, you need to change how you phrase your requests. Instead of using words like “prove,” “confirm,” or “expose,” use “check” or “assess.” Don’t present your suspicions as facts. Phrases like “I already know” or “I am certain” lead the model to validate your beliefs rather than question them. Instead, ask it to build arguments for and against your theory, suggest different explanations, and counter your own ideas.

Specific Prompts You Can Use in Your Own Investigations

Theory is useful, but what most investigators actually want is something they can paste into a chat window tonight. Below are working examples for common OSINT tasks.

For digging into a person’s background, a strong prompt reads something like this.

Act as a neutral OSINT analyst. I am researching a public figure named [name], active in [industry or region]. Using only the material I provide below, build a table of confirmed facts with a source for each one. Separate anything that is an inference or a pattern from anything that is a documented fact. Flag contradictions between sources. Do not draw a conclusion about the person's character or intentions, only report what the material actually supports.

For sorting through a pile of scraped social media posts or forum threads, the goal is structure and pattern detection rather than interpretation.

Read the following set of posts and extract every name, date, location, and organization mentioned. Group them into a timeline ordered by date. Note any account that repeats phrasing found in another account, since that may indicate coordinated rather than organic activity, but do not conclude that it is coordinated, only flag it for review.

For checking a corporate or business connection, the earlier example from this article works well as a template, but it is worth repeating in full because it demonstrates every rule at once.

Assess a possible connection between [subject] and [company] between 2020 and 2025. Use only the material provided. Produce a table with columns for fact, source, supporting detail, confidence level, and what still needs verification. Search for evidence against the connection as thoroughly as evidence for it. List the weak points in the theory separately at the end.

For translating and analyzing foreign language material, always ask for the original text alongside the translation, since that preserves your ability to verify tone, sarcasm, and slang later.

Translate the following text into English. Preserve the original text beside the translation. If any phrase relies on slang, sarcasm, or local idiom that may not translate directly, mark it and explain the likely intended meaning separately from the literal translation.

For comparing multiple documents or reports covering the same event, the model’s strength is spotting overlap and divergence quickly, provided you tell it not to resolve the divergence for you.

Compare the following three reports about the same event. List every claim that all three sources agree on, every claim only one source makes, and every direct contradiction between them. Do not decide which source is correct, only present the disagreement clearly.

And for stress testing your own working theory before it goes into a report, a short adversarial prompt catches more mistakes than another hour of reading.

Here is my working theory: [state theory]. Argue against it as convincingly as you can, using only the evidence already provided in this conversation. Then list what additional evidence, if it existed, would be needed to make the theory solid.

Summary

Carefully written prompts that encourage reasoning are more effective than careless, repetitive prompts. Another important point is that a claim from the model is just a suggestion, not a fact, until you check the source yourself. Even as the tool improves, it’s still your job to decide what is a true finding and what is just a coincidence.

We also invite you to join our AI for Cybersecurity training. During the training, we’ll show you different ways of using AI in cybersecurity, set up local models and solve labs. The field is evolving rapidly and the sooner you learn things, the greater the advantage you’ll have. There’s no reason to resist AI. It’s a tool to master.

The post Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Cybersecurity, Part 24: Prompts That Will Supercharge Your OSINT Research first appeared on Hackers Arise.

Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors and AI enthusiasts!

As we know, the world of LLMs is constantly shifting. LLMs that shine today may become slower or be surpassed as quickly as the next day or month. To help simplify the process of navigating these changes over time, you can turn to OpenRouter.

OpenRouter offers a unified API that allows seamless access and routing among hundreds of LLMs. It also features tools for cost management and fallback options, allowing you to control your LLM spending and optimize performance effectively.

In this article, we will delve into how OpenRouter operates, weigh its pros and cons, and guide you on how to get started. Let’s get rolling!

OpenRouter Architecture: How It Works

When you use OpenRouter, your request never talks to OpenAI or Anthropic directly. It talks to OpenRouter first. OpenRouter acts as a proxy and decides where your request should go, applies your preferences, and hands back one clean response. Let’s walk through how that actually happens, step by step.

It all starts on your end. You make one API call, send your prompt, pick a model (or just let OpenRouter handle that decision), and set whatever parameters you’d normally use.

From there, the request hits OpenRouter’s routing layer, and this thing has to think fast, we’re talking milliseconds. First it checks whether you asked for a specific model or told OpenRouter to optimize on your behalf. Then it starts comparing notes: which provider has the best price right now, which endpoint is fastest at this exact moment, whether your preferred model is even available. If it’s not, routing already has a backup lined up. It also looks at what’s worked well before, so a provider with a strong track record on similar requests tends to get picked more often.

Once that decision is made, your request goes out to an actual provider, maybe OpenAI, maybe Anthropic, maybe Mistral, or really any of the 400-plus models sitting in OpenRouter’s catalog. And here’s what I find genuinely clever about the whole setup: the provider has no idea anything unusual is going on. As far as they’re concerned, it’s just a normal request. They process it, send back a response, done.

That response then makes its way back to OpenRouter, gets cleaned up and put into a consistent format, and lands in your application, no matter which provider actually did the work behind the scenes.

Get Started with OpenRouter

To send requests, you first need to create an account on OpenRouter and obtain your API key. Head over to the official OpenRouter website to sign up.

OpenRouter gives you two ways to start using it. There’s a free tier that grants access to a range of models, so you can start experimenting without spending anything. If you need paid models or services, you simply add pay-as-you-go credits and only pay for what you use.

Once you’ve decided how you’ll use it, the next step is getting your API key. Head to the dashboard, find the “API keys” option, and click “New Key.” A dialog box will pop up showing your new key. Copy it right away and store it somewhere safe.

Making Your First API Call in OpenRouter

To make your first API call to OpenRouter, we’ll utilize the Python programming language. I assume you have some familiarity with it; if not, we offer a series of articles and courses to help you get up to speed. You don’t need to be an expert, but it’s important to grasp concepts such as making HTTP requests and working with JSON responses.

We’ll be using the openai Python package to connect with OpenRouter’s API, and we’ll also incorporate python-dotenv to manage environment variables securely. Additionally, I suggest setting up a Python virtual environment for a smoother experience.

kali> python3 -m venv myenv

kali> source myenv/bin/activate

kali> pip install requests openai python-dotenv

Create an .env file in your project directory and add your OpenRouter key like this:

OPENROUTER_API_KEY=your_api_key

After that, we’re ready to start testing. To do so, we can create a simple script like the one below.

Once you run this script as you typically would with any Python script, you’ll receive a response similar to the one below.

I hope this gives you an idea. OpenRouter features good documentation that covers a lot, and your potential outcomes are only limited by your imagination.

Previously, we discussed how to utilize OpenRouter to create an autonomous AI agent that employs a reasoning loop to streamline OSquery threat hunting. This process transforms raw system data into forensic conclusions at machine speed. You can find more details on this topic here. The process is generally quite straightforward. Additionally, take some time to explore other applications of OpenRouter in the article titled “Targeting LLM Supply Chains with Router-in-the-Middle Attacks.”

What Specific Models Does the OpenRouter API Offer?

OpenRouter provides access to an extensive catalog, featuring over 400 models sourced from various providers. In addition to the well-known chat models, OpenRouter organizes its offerings into collections based on specific use cases. You can explore dedicated sections for vision and multimodal models that analyze images and interpret charts, as well as embedding models designed for semantic search and RAG pipelines. There are also models for video and audio generation, along with text-to-speech and transcription capabilities.

However, figuring out which model to choose and estimating your monthly costs can still be a challenge. To address this, OpenRouter has released its own benchmarks. They maintain five leaderboards that operate on production endpoints, four of which focus on fixed models, allowing you to compare the configurations you actually control.

Another useful feature is the model comparison tool, which lets you select models that interest you and find the best fit for your needs.

How Does OpenRouter Manage Data Privacy and Security While Routing Requests?

When your data reaches OpenRouter, it first hits their servers before being forwarded to the provider that handles the actual inference, such as Anthropic or OpenAI. OpenRouter processes the prompt to route it correctly and log usage, then sends that same prompt to the downstream provider to generate a response. It is important to note that the retention and training policies that apply to your data are a blend of both OpenRouter’s and the provider’s practices, meaning OpenRouter’s privacy settings tell only part of the story.

By default, OpenRouter does not retain your prompts. They only store your prompts or responses if you specifically choose to opt in for logging. There are two distinct opt-in options available. One allows you to view your own prompts and completions in your logs for debugging, while the other gives OpenRouter permission to use your prompt and completion data to enhance the product. This latter option is turned off by default but offers a small usage discount if you enable it. Neither of these options is activated unless you decide to do so.

Additionally, there is a feature called Anonymous Input Categorization. With this feature, OpenRouter samples a small number of prompts for categorization, which helps in reporting and model ranking. If you have not opted in for OpenRouter to use your inputs and outputs, any categorization of your prompts should be stored anonymously and should never be linked to your account or user ID. This categorization is conducted by the model with a strict zero-data-retention policy.

Zero Data Retention, or ZDR, means that OpenRouter will only route your requests to endpoints from providers that do not store your data, and these providers also cannot use your data for training purposes.

Pros and Cons of OpenRouter

The greatest advantage of OpenRouter lies in its convenience. With just one API, you gain access to a multitude of models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and more, eliminating the hassle of managing multiple integrations. It automatically handles failovers, rerouting requests if a provider goes down, and simplifies cost optimization by allowing you to easily compare prices and choose options that fit within your budget.

On the flip side, the main concerns revolve around trust and control. Each request now passes through an additional layer before reaching the actual provider, which introduces another party into your privacy framework.

Summary

OpenRouter has several important benefits for cybersecurity work. By not relying on just one provider, you lower your risk if that provider is breached or goes down. The automatic failover feature keeps your tools running even if a model provider has an outage.

It’s also useful for testing. You can run the same security task on different models without having to rebuild anything each time.

I recommend trying this tool; it might be a great fit for your cybersecurity toolkit.

The post OpenRouter: One Gateway to Every LLM first appeared on Hackers Arise.

Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!

Lately, the constrained AI models that companies keep shipping are becoming less and less useful for cybersecurity. We keep hearing a lot of complaints about Claude in this regard. What they are doing doesn’t really fix the problem, as hackers are not sitting around waiting for the guardrails to be lifted. The barrier to entry for hacking has dropped hard. AI can already automate huge chunks of this cybercrime work. Many of these latest models can even find zero days during engagements.

So poking around your infrastructure looks completely irrelevant. A more meaningful approach is to actually emulate these real attacks with AI, but for that we need a model with no guardrails. Today we are going to show you how to jailbreak a model and self host it for your pentesting work.

What is Obliteratus

Obliteratus is built to strip refusal behavior out of LLMs using abliteration. You’ll see it called abliteration or obliteration, same thing. It targets the internal representations causing the model to refuse in the first place and knocks them out. The model keeps all its core capability, it just stops throwing up artificial walls when you ask it something. It runs on CPU for smaller models, and it’s already been used to abliterate Kimi-K3 along with a bunch of others.

Setting Up

Setting up this tool will take some time, just like the jailbreak process itself. How long depends on your hardware and your internet speed.

kali > sudo apt update
kali > sudo apt install -y python3 python3-pip python3-venv git
kali > git clone https://github.com/elder-plinius/OBLITERATUS.git
kali > cd OBLITERATUS
kali > python3 -m venv venv
kali > source venv/bin/activate
kali > pip install --upgrade pip
kali > pip install -e .

Once it finishes, see if it works:

kali > obliteratus --help

If you don’t have a GPU, don’t worry. You can absolutely make this work with small models using just CPU power. Our Kali VM ran on 12 gigs of RAM and 7 processors, and that setup worked really well.

We went with Qwen 2.5-0.5B-Instruct for this test. You don’t need to have it downloaded beforehand. The tool will fetch it for you automatically. There are different methods available for the jailbreaking process, but advanced and nuclear are the most common. The advanced method is usually enough for most use cases, but if you see the model misbehaving you can escalate to nuclear.

kali > obliteratus obliterate Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct --device cpu --method advanced --output-dir ./abliterated-qwen-0.5b

Once the model downloads, the tool starts running prompts designed to lift the guardrails.

You can find the full list of prompts in obliteratus/prompts.py. Right before it finishes, it runs a series of refusal tests to check whether the model actually complies with requests. Behavior varies a lot depending on which model you’re working with and which method you picked.

In our testing, the advanced method gave us approximately 75% of compliant answers.

At this point, everything is prepared and you can push your model to HuggingFace to share it. But if you want to run it locally, the next step is getting it working with Ollama.

Running Models with Ollama

Aircorridor previously made an article on running Ollama models locally and showed how to do it on a MacBook. If you don’t have it, you can still make this work on a Kali VM using your CPU. We need to convert our new model into a format that Ollama actually understands.

kali > git clone https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp
kali > cd llama.cpp; python3 -m venv venv; source venv/bin/activate
kali > pip install -r requirements.txt
kali > python convert_hf_to_gguf.py /home/kali/OBLITERATUS/abliterated-qwen-0.5b --outfile qwen2.5-0.5b-abliterated-f16.gguf --outtype f16

Next, we create a Modelfile that points to the model:

kali > cat > Modelfile << EOF
FROM ./qwen2.5-0.5b-abliterated-f16.gguf
EOF

Then we create the model using Ollama:

kali > ollama create qwen05b-abliterated -f Modelfile

At this point, everything is ready and you can start testing it. The better the model you start with, the better your results will be.

kali > ollama run qwen05-abliterated

But even with a small model like this, you’ll see it do things that normally it wouldn’t.

Abliterated Models

This tool is helpful for doing the work yourself and understanding the logic behind the whole process. But if you’re working at scale and don’t have time to spend on each model individually, just keep in mind that many abliterated models are available on HuggingFace uploaded by huihui.ai. They’ve already done the heavy lifting for a lot of popular models.

If you can’t find exactly what you need in their collection, you now know how to do it yourself.

Summary

The landscape of offensive security has shifted because AI got so good at automation. Simple pentests with constrained models don’t prepare you for the reality out there anymore. As you can see, there’s no reason to work with constrained models in cybersecurity, when the people you’re up against are exploiting the full capability of a model with nothing holding them back. So test your environment with abliterated models before someone else does it. The tool is great for staying ahead of the actual threats.

The post Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity, Part 25: Jailbreaking AI Models with Obliteratus first appeared on Hackers Arise.

Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!

Many software-as-a-service (SaaS) platforms are adding AI chatbots to their products. But these bots do more than just chat; they can access internal tools and perform tasks for users. Each of these actions creates a potential security risk, and developers are releasing these features faster than they can secure them.

In this article, I want to share a type of vulnerability I found while testing an AI chatbot – LLM02:2025 Sensitive Information Disclosure – which allowed me to obtain users’ first and last names and email addresses just by interacting with the chatbot. Let’s get rolling!

What is LLM02:2025 Sensitive Information Disclosure?

LLM02:2025 Sensitive Information Disclosure is a critical security issue listed in the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025. This problem occurs when a Large Language Model (LLM) application accidentally reveals confidential or personal information in its responses.

This vulnerability happens because LLMs are designed to be helpful and use all available context, such as training data, system prompts, and runtime inputs, to create replies. If sensitive information is included in these sources without proper protections, the model may accidentally disclose information it should keep private.

Step 1: Find the Hidden Feature Behind the Feature

Our target had a chat feature that looked, on its face, completely trivial: type an arithmetic expression wrapped in double curly braces, and the bot evaluates it and replies with the answer.

{{5-5+0}} = 0
{{5*5+0}} = 25

Just like a calculator. But the interesting bugs live in the features nobody thought to test twice. So I started varying the input systematically, the way you’d fuzz any parameter in a pentest. And the calculator started talking back with things that were most definitely not numbers:

{{5-0+0}} → collectionPropertyOption://CollectionName
{{1-0+0}} → https://domain/p/CollectionName
{{2-0+0}} → user://UUID

This shows that the “calculator” is really a thin cover for a much riskier part of the code, which allows direct access to the platform’s internal system without any authentication.

Step 2: Isolate the Real Trigger

When you notice a leak like this, do not just note it down. Understand what is causing it.

My first guess was that the final answer of the expression is used as a lookup index. This is easy to test. Try expressions that all result in the same number through different math operations:

{{2+2}}    = 4        (plain number)
{{2+2+0}}  = 4        (plain number)
{{2-2+0}}  = user://UUID    ← NOT a plain number!

That last result contradicted my guess. The expression 2-2+0 simplifies to 0, but the result came back as an object reference instead of a plain number, similar to when the expression equals 2. This was a clue. I ran a few similar tests to confirm:

{{4-2}}    (=2)  → collectionProperty:// reference (type 4, not type 2)
{{5-2+0}}  (=3)  → collectionPropertyOption:// reference (type 5, not type 3)
{{0+2-2}}  (=0)  → plain number (type 0)

In conclusion, the lookup key is based on the first operand’s type, not the final arithmetic result. The developer’s evaluator takes the first number from the input and puts it directly into an internal array, sorted by object type, completely separate from what the expression calculates. I confirmed this by testing the limits:

{{99-2+0}}              = 97 (plain math, outside the enum)  
{{99999999999-0+0}}     = 99999999999 (same, safely out of range)

Step 3: Turn the Reference Into a Record

The next question is obvious: will the system actually resolve that reference if I hand it back to it?

Yes. It will.

{{user://<uuid>}} → returns first name, last name, and email address of that user.

This AI chatbot successfully provided information about any user by knowing his UUID.

Summary

Finding an issue like this, such as index leak, reference resolution, and PII disclosure, is not just luck; it is a systematic approach. This is the practical skill we teach at Hackers-Arise. As AI systems become part of every platform you will test, hackers who understand these new areas of attack will have the best tools and the highest salaries. Check out our Subscriber training package to start building these skills effectively and methodically.

The post Hacking: How a “Calculator” Feature Can Leak Internal Object References (and Real User PII) in AI Chatbots first appeared on Hackers Arise.

Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!

In one of our previous articles, Aircorridor showed you how to do recon on exposed Ollama servers. There are a surprising number of them scattered across countries all over the world, and unfortunately, most of them are left completely unprotected. That means hackers can use the CPU and GPU power of those servers to run their own tools. It’s not just that they can generate answers to random questions using your exposed models. These models can also be pushed into generating malware, rewriting scripts and exploits to slip past antivirus software, and helping someone hack into other systems entirely. All of it running on your hardware, at your expense, while you have no idea it’s happening. Our goal here is to raise awareness about this problem so you understand what can happen when a model gets left exposed.

Ollama

It all starts with a simple Shodan query, and right now that query turns up 4,222 exposed hosts. That number keeps shifting as more people jump into the AI space, and most of these hosts are sitting there vulnerable to the kinds of attacks we’re about to walk through.

Following Aircorridor’s example, you can list the models running on one of these servers. As you’ll quickly notice, there’s often a long list, sometimes more than 40 models on a single host.

kali > curl http://IP:11434/api/tags | jq . | grep -ai ‘“model”’

The ones that matter most here are the local models, not the cloud. They don’t require an API key to reach. Of course, not every listed model is actually active, so a quick curl request is usually enough to check whether one is really responding.

kali > curl -s http://IP:11434/api/generate -H “Content-Type: application/json” -d ‘{“model”:”huihui_ai/gpt-oss-abliterated:latest”,”prompt”:”Say PWNED and nothing else.”,”stream”:false}’ | jq . | grep -iE ‘“response”|thinking”’

When a model does respond, that confirms it’s live and usable, which means it can be put to work for all sorts of purposes, good or bad. Let’s walk through a few of the ways that tend to play out.

Coding

Because these exposed models have no guardrails, they’re an attractive resource for coding tasks, including rewriting malware or generating backdoors. To pull this off, hackers often bring the model straight into VS Code using a plugin called Continue, which lets them integrate an external model directly into their coding workflow.

Once installed, they’ll edit the config file to point at the exposed server’s IP address along with the model’s name. This config can hold multiple models at once, so a hacker can switch between them right there in the chat window.

With that setup in place, the model shows up ready to work and it often has no issue generating malicious code that could cause real damage to systems out on the internet. 

The same pattern shows up with exploit development and antivirus evasion, where a model can take old exploits and rewrite them so they slip past AV detection.

Hacking

Once an exploit has been generated, the next step for a hacker is putting it to use against real systems. We covered a tool called PentestCode in an earlier article, and while it normally relies on free AI models through OpenCode Zen, it can just as easily be pointed at someone else’s exposed local model instead. This is just one example among many. Plenty of other tools work the exact same way, running on borrowed compute that belongs to somebody who has no idea it’s being used.

To connect PentestCode to an exposed model, a config file gets created at ~/.config/pentestcode/pentestcode.json. 

Once that’s in place, the tool automatically lists the available models. It’s worth noting that not every model supports tool use. DeepSeek R1, for example, doesn’t support it, and neither do a handful of others. So if a given exposed model doesn’t support tools, it’s simply not useful to a hacker in this particular scenario.

Chat Assistant

Finally, exposed local models can also be accessed through a full chat interface using Open WebUI, which looks a lot cleaner than working from the command line. It has the kind of layout people are used to by now, with folders, chat history, channels, and separate workspaces. It takes a bit of disk space and a little patience to install, but once it’s running, it’s a solid and polished experience.

Summary

Running Ollama is not inherently dangerous. Simply exposing a model doesn’t automatically put you at risk of a data breach or account compromise. What it does do is hand hackers free access to your CPU and GPU, letting them run their own workloads on your dime without your knowledge or consent. That alone is a real cost, even if nothing else goes wrong.

The bigger danger shows up with older, outdated Ollama instances. Older versions are more likely to carry known vulnerabilities, and there are documented CVEs out there that can lead to full API exposure. When that happens, hackers aren’t just borrowing your compute anymore. They can steal your API keys outright and use them for whatever purpose they like. Keeping Ollama updated and making sure it isn’t sitting exposed to the open internet goes a long way toward avoiding both problems entirely.

We also invite you to join our AI for Cybersecurity training, available to our Subscriber Pro members. During the training, we’ll cover practical ways to use AI in cybersecurity, show you how to install and run local models, and much more. The field is evolving rapidly, and the sooner you learn to use these tools, the greater your advantage will be.

The post Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Cybersecurity, Part 24: Abusing Exposed Ollama Models first appeared on Hackers Arise.

Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!

Lately we have been covering the use of AI in cybersecurity and this space has been growing so fast that it’s hard to keep up sometimes. It’s only going to keep growing from here, so it’s smart to learn how to use it to your advantage instead of getting left behind.

Today we’re going to show you a pentest tool that works with different models. The tool comes ready to use right out of the box and you don’t have to provide your API key to get started. During our own testing, we did eventually hit a usage limit, but by that point we had already gotten a ton of work done. The limits will reset every day, sometimes you just need to wait 5-14 hours. But the daily limit should be enough for you to complete many of your tasks.

What is PentestCode

PentestCode is an autonomous agent that lives in your terminal. You point it at a target and from there it takes over. It can run tools, read the output, build a picture of the network as it decides what step makes sense next. Under the hood, it’s a hard fork of OpenCode, but stripped of all the code editing features and rebuilt from the ground up with offensive security in mind.

In our experience the tool did well in both web and network pentesting. Of course, everyone’s mileage may vary, so give it a shot yourself and see how it fits into your workflow. With that said, let’s get it set up.

Setting Up

All you need to do is unzip the release version and start it up. Before you do that though, make sure you are downloading the original project made by s0ld13rr and not some fork. There have been reports of forks being bundled with infected files, so stick to the source.

kali > wget https://github.com/s0ld13rr/pentestcode/releases/download/v0.2.5/pentestcode-linux-x64.tar.gz
kali > 7z x pentestcode-linux-x64.tar.gz
kali > 7z x pentestcode-linux-x64.tar

And that’s it, we are ready to launch.

Working with PentestCode

Once you launch the tool, the console will appear.

kali > ./pentestcode

At this point you can either leave everything at the default settings or tweak the model and the provider yourself. By default, the tool is set up with OpenCode Zen as the provider and Big Pickle as the model, though you can switch that over to DeepSeek v4 Flash. 

If you want to connect to a different provider, just type /connect.

And whenever you want to swap the model, just type /models and pick from the list.

Active Directory

Let’s start by testing this against our own lab. We gave it an Active Directory account with low privileges and asked to pull some interesting information from LDAP.

It came back with domain admins, misconfigs, machine accounts and more.

At the very end of the report, it suggested the next steps based on everything it found. 

Then we brought in BloodHound to see the relationships across the domain. If you have been following our earlier articles, you already know that our lowpriv account is set up as a kind of backdoor, since it holds GenericAll rights over AdminSDHolder. The tool found the backdoor and exploited it.

The agent performed a DCSync attack and pulled every user hash in the environment. Then we asked it to generate a golden ticket.

It pulled it off using the Impacket. Keep in mind, using Impacket won’t always work against a protected endpoint, so it’s important to spell out clearly how you want the pentest to be done. If you are running this against a live target, put real guardrails in place and give the tool much more detailed prompts so it does not wander somewhere it shouldn’t.

Finally, we get to the tedious part of a pentest. It’s writing up the report. You can do it in different formats using /report.

kali > sudo apt install glow
kali > glow report.md

Web Pentesting and Bug Bounty Hunting

Web pentesting is such a massive topic on its own that plenty of people end up specializing in just one or two attacks testing them across different targets. PentestCode can be used here too, once you give it a good starting point through solid reconnaissance. You can toggle between modes using Tab, switching back and forth between Recon and Pentest.

We intentionally kept our prompt vague, just to see how creative the tool would get on its own and pointed it at a website. Within 15 minutes, it mapped out every subdomain tied to that company and tested the infrastructure behind each one.

The goal was to get an RCE. We didn’t expect much to come of it, but it managed to do it.

PentestCode uploaded a webshell and used curl to do recon on the internal network from there. On top of that, it compromised both a mail account and a MySQL database. The admin panel was also exploited with a CSRF vulnerability. Pretty impressive stuff, honestly.

The tool comes in handy during post exploitation as well. In our test, it exploited a vulnerability in PostgreSQL and escalated its way up to superuser access, then went through the databases and pulled out some interesting data. You can see some of it below.

Summary

If you decide to test PentestCode yourself, make sure you steer clear of vague prompts and set clear boundaries so that it doesn’t go further than it should. Use /pause to choose a mode where it stops and waits for your approval before moving forward. We believe that it’s important to keep a human in the loop in cybersecurity work like this. 

We also invite you to join our AI for Cybersecurity training. During the training, we’ll show you different ways of using AI in cybersecurity, set up local models and solve labs. The field is evolving rapidly and the sooner you learn things, the greater the advantage you’ll have. There’s no reason to resist AI. It’s a tool to master.

The post Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Cybersecurity, Part 23: Using PentestCode for Pentesting and Bug Bounty Hunting first appeared on Hackers Arise.

Welcome back, aspiring hackers!

The density of WiFi access points in modern cities has now reached a point where a large-scale surveillance system may be able to identify almost anyone who walks near a router, even if that person is not carrying a mobile phone. Researchers from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) have published a scientific paper describing this kind of system and the technology that makes it possible.

At the center of this surveillance method is a feature called beamforming, which first appeared with the WiFi 5 (802.11ac) standard in 2013–2014. The basic idea was introduced with WiFi 5, but it became much more refined and effective with WiFi 6 (802.11ax), where the technology matured into something more practical.

Beamforming

Beamforming, also called spatial filtering, is a signal processing technique used to send and receive wireless signals in specific directions rather than spreading them evenly in every direction. In simple marketing language, this is often described as a router that “does not broadcast equally everywhere anymore, but instead follows the user with a focused beam.” That description is not wrong, but it leaves out the technical depth behind the idea.

From an engineering point of view, beamforming works by combining several antennas into a group called an array. When the signals from these antennas are timed and lined up correctly, they boost each other in certain directions. In other directions, they cancel each other out. The result is a signal that is far more focused and efficient than older systems, which simply broadcast outward in every direction at once.

Beamforming gives both senders and receivers the ability to focus on signals coming from one direction while blocking out noise from others. Because of that, the technique is used not only in WiFi, but also in radar, sonar, seismology, wireless communications, radio astronomy, acoustics, and biomedical engineering.

Identifying People Through WiFi Signals

As radio waves move through space, they do not simply travel in a straight, clean line. They interact with the world around them in many different ways. They can pass through objects, reflect off surfaces, become absorbed, become polarized, bend around obstacles, scatter in different directions, or refract as they cross boundaries between materials. This means that when a WiFi system sends a signal and later receives it back, the final result contains information about everything the signal encountered along the way. By comparing the expected signal with the received one, it becomes possible to measure interference and use that information to correct transmission errors. But that same interference also reveals details about the environment itself.

For example, when a person enters the path of a WiFi signal, the signal changes. Human bodies affect radio waves in measurable ways. The signal may weaken, shift, scatter, or behave differently depending on movement, posture, and position. If researchers analyze these changes carefully, they can infer a surprising amount of information about the surrounding environment. They may detect whether people are present, what they are doing, and in some cases even who they are.

This whole research area has grown into a separate field known as WiFi Sensing.

Most WiFi Sensing research is presented as useful and harmless, and in many cases it really is. It can support smart-home features, occupancy detection and other practical applications. But the privacy concerns are obvious. When these methods are combined with activity recognition and the massive spread of WiFi hotspots, they can reveal highly sensitive information. One of the most troubling possibilities is that someone could be identified in the range of a hotspot and then tracked over time without ever knowing it.

Using Channel Information for Identification

There are several ways a person can be identified through WiFi. One important method relies on analysis of Channel State Information (CSI), which is sent at the physical layer of WiFi communication. CSI is detailed and useful for WiFi sensing. It gives a rich picture of how the wireless channel behaves. The problem is that CSI is not always easy to access. In many cases, it requires modified firmware and specialized hardware support, which limits how widely it can be used in practice.

The table above compares roughly 25 different systems, evaluating them across several key dimensions. The Paper column lists the name of each system, while the Identities column shows how many different people each system is capable of distinguishing between. The Accuracy column then reflects how reliably each system correctly identifies a person. On the technical side, the Pre-Processing column describes the signal processing techniques each system applies to clean and transform raw WiFi data before passing it to a machine learning model, and the Model Architecture column identifies what type of model is used. The Perspective column shows how subjects were positioned or moving during data collection, such as standing orthogonally, performing gestures, or typing keystrokes.

Beamforming entered the picture for a different reason. As mentioned earlier, it was introduced in WiFi 5 to improve throughput and make wireless communication more efficient. But beamforming also depends on environmental information that is similar to CSI. The difference is that this information is gathered on the transmitter side rather than the receiver side.

The key new dimensions here are the Inference column, showing the wide variety of tasks these systems tackle, from respiratory rate monitoring and crowd counting to sign language recognition.

In a typical beamforming setup, client devices send something called Beamforming Feedback Information (BFI) back to the access point. BFI is a condensed snapshot of current signal conditions. It tells the access point how the wireless channel looks so that it can adjust its transmission for better performance.

The key difference between CSI and BFI is that BFI is transmitted back to the access point without encryption. This makes it much easier to collect using standard, off-the-shelf hardware, without needing any special software modifications. That significantly lowers the bar for potential misuse. The privacy concern gets even more serious when you consider that the IEEE is already working on making WiFi sensing an official standard through the upcoming 802.11bf update and based on the current draft, without putting strong privacy protections in place.

KIT Researchers Demonstrate Phone-Free Identification

Researchers at KIT showed that people can be identified using only BFI data, even when they are not carrying a smartphone or any other wireless device. The method does not depend on a person bringing along a tracked gadget. It works using ordinary WiFi devices already present in the environment and already communicating with one another.

As radio waves move through space and interact with the human body, they create patterns that can be captured, analyzed, and compared. In that sense, the process starts to resemble imaging, almost as if the wireless system were building a rough picture of a scene without using a camera. The result is not a photograph in the normal sense, but the data can carry enough structure to support identity inference.

WiFi Routers as Silent Observers

“The technology turns every router into a potential surveillance device,” says Julian Todt, one of the study’s authors. “If you regularly walk past a café that has a WiFi network, you could be identified without your knowledge and later recognized by government agencies or commercial companies.”

That is a serious warning, and it captures the core concern very well. Intelligence services and cybercriminals already have many easier ways to monitor people, including compromising CCTV systems or intercepting video communications. But wireless networks are different. They create a nearly invisible surveillance layer that already exists in a huge number of places.

Unlike earlier approaches that depended on LiDAR sensors or on reflection-based systems using walls, furniture, and human bodies, this method works with standard WiFi equipment. By collecting BFI data, researchers can build representations of people from several different viewing angles. These representations are then used to distinguish one person from another, even when the number of people is large. Once the machine learning model has been trained, the identification process can happen in just a few seconds.

Experimental Results

The study involved 197 participants. The researchers reported that they were able to identify individuals with nearly 100% accuracy, regardless of viewing angle or walking style. That is an impressive result, but it did not come easily. To reach that level of accuracy, the model needed a substantial amount of machine learning training. Each person in the training set performed around 20 walking passes before the model was trained.

During the research two TP-Link Archer BE800 routers were used. The experiment relied on channels 37 and 85. It also used two non-overlapping 160 MHz channels in the 6 GHz band available under WiFi 6E. The hardware included Intel AX210 WiFi network adapters.

The researchers stress that the technology is powerful, but also potentially dangerous. The risks are especially serious in authoritarian states, where systems like this could be used for large-scale population surveillance. In such settings, the ability to identify people without their phones, without cameras and without obvious visible monitoring would be a major privacy threat.

For that reason, the authors strongly recommend that privacy protections and security safeguards be built into the upcoming IEEE 802.11bf standard from the start, rather than added later as an afterthought.

WiFi 6 Routers as Motion Sensors

In fact, WiFi-based sensing has become so effective that some modern routers already include motion-detection features right out of the box, and manufacturers openly advertise them.

Features such as WiFi Motion Detection allow homeowners to monitor activity inside their homes through mobile apps, using nothing more than changes in WiFi signal patterns.

A feature designed for convenience in a home can also become part of a much broader surveillance system when deployed at scale.

Related WiFi and Bluetooth Scanning Tools

As an additional note, several tools already exist that monitor wireless activity in nearby environments. They don’t work exactly the same way as the techniques we covered earlier, but they’re still useful.

Pi.Alert scans devices connected to a WiFi network, detects unknown devices, and sends notifications when devices unexpectedly disconnect from the network. It is often used as a practical awareness tool for keeping track of what is present on a home or local network.

WireTapper discovers nearby wireless signals, including WiFi networks, Bluetooth devices, hidden cameras, vehicles, headphones, televisions, and cellular towers. It gives the user a broader view of the wireless environment around them, which can be useful for awareness and inspection.

Video

We also have an video on this topic with Master OTW and Yaniv Hoffman. In the video, OTW explains how hackers can use SDR, AI, and Wi-Fi signals to detect human movement through walls, how the technology works, and talk about practical ways to defend against it. Feel free to check it out.

Summary

As modern routers gain advanced sensing, they can also become tools for observing and identifying people through the way their bodies interact with wireless signals. The KIT research shows that this is a practical technology that can identify individuals with remarkable accuracy using ordinary WiFi hardware. Although WiFi sensing can be valuable for smart homes and automation, it also raises serious privacy concerns. Privacy protections will need to become just as important as performance improvements.

If you’re interested in Wi-Fi security, our Wi-Fi Hacking training can help you gain the necessary experience. This attack vector is often underestimated, and many organizations are vulnerable to it. It is definitely valuable in penetration testing.

The post Wi-Fi Hacking: Wi-Fi Can Now Identify You Without Your Phone first appeared on Hackers Arise.

Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!

Open Source Intelligence, or OSINT, is a powerful yet underrated cybersecurity discipline. A solid reconnaissance phase uncovers vast target information before active probing even begins.

Traditionally, effective OSINT was a painful process. It meant juggling fragmented tools and manually parsing disjointed data to map a target. AI can completely automate this workflow. It calls the right tools in order and explains its analytical reasoning.

This article explores OpenOSINT, an automated intelligence agent built for security researchers. We will install the framework and test its core capabilities using real commands. Let’s get rolling!

What is OpenOSINT?

OpenOSINT is an artificial intelligence assistant designed to automatically gather public information and conduct digital investigations. To interact with OpenOSINT, you can choose from four different methods depending on your comfort level with computers. Beginners will likely prefer the web interface. For those who prefer working with text, the tool offers an interactive terminal. There is also a direct command line interface for running quick commands. Finally, it can act as a background server using MCP that plugs directly into other AI applications, like Claude Desktop.

The way this AI works makes it super reliable and gets rid of that annoying problem of AI making stuff up. When we ask OpenOSINT to do something, it connects to an AI engine. If the AI realizes it needs to look something up, it totally pauses and waits. Your computer then boots into tools, runs the actual program it needs, gathers the right info, and sends that back to the AI. Because the model has to wait for real results instead of just guessing, it can’t fake or invent any findings (or at least will do that less often).

If OSINT is a skill you want to develop seriously, we strongly encourage you to check out the dedicated OSINT series. It covers passive and active reconnaissance techniques, social media intelligence, geolocation, and much more, all taught by practitioners who do this work professionally.

Step 1: Installing OpenOSINT

Let’s clone and install the framework.

kali > git clone https://github.com/OpenOSINT/OpenOSINT.git

kali > cd OpenOSINT

From the observation of the source file, we can confirm that it’s a Python project. Our next step should be the installation of dependencies. Before that, it’s wise to create a dedicated virtual environment.

kali > pip install -e .

The command above uses the -e flag to install the package in editable mode. This means that any changes we make to the source files will be reflected immediately without the need to reinstall the package.

Next, we will install the external dependencies for OpenOSINT. Each dependency supports a specific investigation module, and the framework will still function properly even if some dependencies are missing. Holehe is used for email account enumeration, while Sherlock conducts username enumeration across more than 300 platforms. Sublist3r is utilized for subdomain enumeration. Installation is simple and can be done easily using pip.

kali > pip install holehe

kali > pip install sherlock-project

kali > pip install sublist3r

Another important tool for OpenOSINT is PhoneInfoga. It’s distributed as a standalone binary rather than a Python package, so download the latest release for your architecture from its GitHub releases page.

kali > tar -xzf phoneinfoga_Linux_x86_64.tar.gz

kali > sudo mv phoneinfoga /usr/local/bin/

Step 2: Configuring API Keys

OpenOSINT becomes significantly more effective when supplemented with additional information from external tools like VirusTotal. This integration allows OpenOSINT to gain a clearer understanding of the situation and ultimately make better decisions.

To configure the API keys, we need to open the .env file:

OpenOSINT supports a wide range of services. In this instance, I will specify my Anthropic API, VirusTotal, and Censys.

Step 3: Testing OpenOSINT Web Mode

OpenOSINT offers several ways to use its features. One of them is the AI REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop), which is a simple, interactive programming environment that accepts user inputs, executes them, and returns the results. Another option is through the web interface, which I will use. There is also a direct tool usage method, but since it does not involve AI, I will not focus on it here, as we can use those tools directly without OpenOSINT.

To start the OpenOSINT web server, use the following command:

kali> openosint web

This command will open a webpage that looks like the one shown below.

Let’s start with a username investigation.

First, the system initiated a broad tool-based check across numerous platforms, returning raw data showing specific profile URLs for the username “tomilov” on sites ranging from Audiojungle and Behance to Codeforces and Discord, indicating presence on creative, social, and gaming platforms.

Finally, it synthesizes these findings into points, such as the subject’s probable Russian origin and their clear professional background. Essentially, the tool executed a digital footprinting task and transformed the results into categorized intelligence.

Next, let’s investigate a domain.

As shown in the screenshot above, the tool initiated its workflow by pulling WHOIS registration data, which fetched the registrar, the creation date from 2009, and the owning organization, LLC KUPISHUZ. At the same time, it performed a subdomain enumeration scan to map out associated hosts and queried VirusTotal to check the domain’s reputation against multiple security vendors.

The system then processed this raw data into a structured intelligence report. It verified that the domain possesses a long-standing, 14-plus year history with no malicious detections on VirusTotal. It also classified the discovered subdomains into operational roles, identifying specific functions such as a main website, a careers portal, internal networking infrastructure, an order tracking portal, and a Single Sign-On authentication platform.

Now, let’s test the email module.

This tool initiated its workflow by running an email enumeration scan using a utility called Holehe, checking the address across 121 websites. This initial check successfully verified active account registrations on Amazon, Flickr, Gravatar, Office365, and Twitter. During this phase, the tool also attempted to query breach data, paste sites, and search engine footprints, but these background tasks failed.

Following the raw scans, the tool generated a series of pre-configured Google dork links targeted at finding the email or username on LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook. The system then compiled these results into an Investigation Summary, detailing the discovered platforms and extracting specific metadata, such as the full name and profile URL linked to the target’s Gravatar account.

Finally, the tool outlined a set of next steps for a manual investigator.

Now, let’s run automated open-source intelligence investigation on the specific IP address.

The single successful data extraction came exclusively from the VirusTotal module. This integration successfully returned infrastructure information revealing that the IP address belongs to a network block managed by Senko Digital LLC, which operates as a hosting or virtual private server provider located in Germany. More importantly, the tool retrieved threat assessment telemetry showing that twelve distinct security engines explicitly flagged this specific IP address as malicious, while one categorized it as suspicious, forty-six marked it clean, and thirty-two left it undetected.

Based entirely on this VirusTotal telemetry, the tool synthesized the findings into a security alert status. It concluded that the infrastructure carries a high risk because it is hosted by a VPS provider commonly leveraged for anonymity and possesses a high detection rate across reputable security vendors.

Summary

OSINT remains one of the most high-leverage skills in the cybersecurity field, and tools like OpenOSINT that bring AI-driven automation to the reconnaissance phase will only become more effective and beginner-friendly. If you want to develop your OSINT skills from first principles alongside hands-on tool training, make sure to check out the OSINT Training and join the growing community of intelligence practitioners.

The post Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Cybersecurity, Part 22: Grounding OpenOSINT with Real Tool Execution to Prevent AI Hallucinations first appeared on Hackers Arise.