❌

Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Today β€” 29 October 2026Main stream

Cloudflare Image Transformation Flaw Allows Hackers to Bypass CSP and Execute Malicious JavaScript

By: Divya
29 October 2026 at 02:18

Security researchers have demonstrated an attack chain against Cloudflare’s Image Transformations service that bypasses SVG sanitization and Content Security Policy (CSP), enabling malicious JavaScript execution on a targeted website’s origin. Published on October 28, 2026, the research combines an XML serialization flaw, Chromium cache behavior, and redirects that circumvent image source restrictions. Exploitation depends on […]

The post Cloudflare Image Transformation Flaw Allows Hackers to Bypass CSP and Execute Malicious JavaScript appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

Security Researchers Demonstrate Chrome Sandbox Escapes, Telegram Zero-Click Attacks and iOS Zero-Day Research

By: Divya
29 October 2026 at 02:00

Security researchers at OffensiveCon Japan 2026 explored topics including Chrome sandbox escapes, zero-click attack surfaces in Telegram, and newly discovered iOS zero-day vulnerabilities. This two-day program took place on October 27–28. The published agenda also covered hypervisor exploitation, Windows privilege escalation, Linux kernel techniques, and AI-assisted security research. However, session titles alone do not indicate […]

The post Security Researchers Demonstrate Chrome Sandbox Escapes, Telegram Zero-Click Attacks and iOS Zero-Day Research appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

Hackers Turn Compromised Websites Into Fake Cloudflare Verification Traps for Windows and Mac Users

29 October 2026 at 01:56

Attackers are using compromised websites to present fake Cloudflare verification pages that steer Windows and macOS users toward executing malicious commands. The findings establish a delivery attempt, not a confirmed infection or identified malware family. The activity exploits the familiarity of browser security checks. Instead of completing a legitimate verification, visitors receive instructions intended to […]

The post Hackers Turn Compromised Websites Into Fake Cloudflare Verification Traps for Windows and Mac Users appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

WordPress 7.1.4 Security Update Patches 22 Vulnerabilities Affecting Millions of Websites

By: Divya
29 October 2026 at 01:35

WordPress has released version 7.1.4 to address 22 vulnerabilities, including issues related to remote code execution, stored cross-site scripting, information disclosure, and authorization weaknesses. This security update was published on October 28, 2026, and it is recommended that users upgrade immediately. The fixes encompass core functionality, including content blocks, administrative screens, the Customizer, and the […]

The post WordPress 7.1.4 Security Update Patches 22 Vulnerabilities Affecting Millions of Websites appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

CyberDakait Hackers Target Indian Banking Users, Compromise 17,960 Android Devices

29 October 2026 at 01:26

CyberDakait, a financially motivated Android malware operation targeting Indian banking customers since July 2025. Researchers identified at least 17,960 compromised devices and 7,611,443 intercepted SMS messages, exposing a campaign that combines banking credential theft, remote device control, and cryptocurrency mining. Although their technical implementations differ, Group-IB clusters them together because of overlapping distribution methods, phishing […]

The post CyberDakait Hackers Target Indian Banking Users, Compromise 17,960 Android Devices appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

Password Cracking: Stealing Credentials with PCredz

PCredz is a network credential analysis tool that examines packet captures to identify potentially exposed authentication data. Security professionals can use it to investigate insecure protocols, understand credential exposure, and identify weaknesses in network authentication.

Welcome back, fellow cybersecurity enthusiasts!

In this tutorial, we will explore PCredz, a tool used for network traffic analysis, credential exposure assessment, PCAP analysis, and authentication security testing. Rather than manually inspecting every packet, PCredz can help identify supported authentication artifacts within captured network traffic.

Understanding how credentials travel across a network is an important part of ethical hacking, penetration testing, incident response, and defensive cybersecurity. Analyzing these artifacts can help organizations discover legacy authentication protocols and reduce the risk of credential theft.

Official GitHub repository: PCredz on GitHub

1. What Is PCredz?

PCredz is an open-source tool designed to extract supported credential artifacts and other sensitive information from network packet captures. It is useful when examining traffic generated by older protocols or authentication mechanisms that may expose sensitive information.

Depending on the protocol and the available packet data, PCredz can identify artifacts associated with authentication mechanisms such as NTLM and Kerberos, as well as certain HTTP authentication methods and credentials associated with services such as FTP, POP, SMTP, and IMAP.

It may also identify other sensitive data patterns, including certain payment-card number patterns and SNMP community strings. Detection depends on the capture contents, protocol support, and tool version.

A critical distinction is that finding an authentication artifact does not automatically mean that a valid, reusable password has been recovered. Some protocols expose hashes, challenge-response exchanges, or other material that requires further analysis.

2. Key Features and Capabilities of PCredz

Network Packet Capture Analysis

PCredz can process supported packet capture files, making it useful for investigating previously recorded traffic. PCAP files may contain evidence of insecure authentication, accidental data exposure, or legacy protocols that should be reviewed.

Authentication Artifact Identification

The tool can help identify supported authentication-related data, including certain NTLM and Kerberos artifacts. These findings can support a wider security assessment of authentication configurations and network exposure.

Multiple Protocols

Depending on the captured traffic and implementation, the tool can inspect authentication exchanges associated with several common network services. Support for IPv4 and IPv6 traffic also makes it relevant to mixed network environments.

Structured Output

PCredz can write discovered artifacts to output files, including a credential dump file. Structured output helps security analysts review findings, document evidence, and investigate potential exposure without manually collecting every result.

3. When Would You Use PCredz?

PCredz is relevant to both offensive security assessments and defensive network investigations when its use is explicitly authorized.

Internal Security Assessments

Security teams can analyze approved packet captures to determine whether legacy services or authentication configurations expose sensitive data. The results can help prioritize the migration of insecure services and the improvement of network segmentation.

Incident Response

During an investigation, analysts may inspect existing packet captures for authentication artifacts associated with suspicious activity. Any discovered credentials or hashes should be handled as sensitive evidence and stored securely.

Legacy Protocol Audits

Older business environments may still contain services that use outdated authentication mechanisms or transmit information without adequate protection. PCredz can help identify evidence of these weaknesses when relevant traffic is available.

Security Training and Research

In a controlled lab, PCredz can demonstrate why encrypted transport, modern authentication, and strong network security policies matter. Students can compare insecure and secure authentication configurations using traffic generated specifically for the exercise.

Important: Only inspect traffic that you own or are explicitly authorized to analyze. Captured network traffic can contain personal information, session tokens, credentials, and other confidential data.

4. Installing PCredz on Linux

PCredz is available through its official GitHub repository. Before installation, review the repository's current instructions and dependencies. The commands below illustrate a basic Linux setup; exact requirements may vary with the current version of the project and your distribution.

Step 1: Install the Required Packages

On Debian-based systems, such as Kali Linux, update the package index and install Python virtual environment support and relevant development dependencies.

sudo apt update
sudo apt install python3 python3-venv python3-pip
sudo apt install libpcap-dev file git

Step 2: Clone the Official Repository

git clone https://github.com/lgandx/pcredz.git
cd pcredz

Step 3: Create a Virtual Environment

A Python virtual environment keeps project dependencies separate from system-wide Python packages. This is particularly useful on recent Kali Linux and Debian releases, where system Python environments are managed by the operating system.

python3 -m venv pcredz-env
source pcredz-env/bin/activate

Step 4: Review and Install Dependencies

Check the repository for its current dependency instructions before installing packages. If the project provides a requirements file, review it and install the documented dependencies inside the activated environment.

python -m pip install --upgrade pip
# If the repository provides requirements.txt:
python -m pip install -r requirements.txt

Do not assume that every version of PCredz uses the same dependency list. If installation fails, consult the official repository documentation and the error message before changing system packages.

5. Understanding Live Network Traffic Analysis

Live traffic analysis involves examining packets as they pass through a network interface. It can help authorized network administrators identify insecure authentication exchanges and investigate suspicious network activity.

Before performing live capture, identify the correct interface and verify that the capture is approved by the network owner. Interface names differ between systems, so do not assume that every machine uses eth0.

To list available interfaces, use:

ip -br addr

For an authorized assessment, follow the current usage instructions provided by the official PCredz repository. Confirm that the selected interface is appropriate and that the capture scope is limited to the approved environment.

Capturing on an interface does not guarantee visibility into all network traffic. Switching infrastructure, VLAN configuration, Wi-Fi encryption, virtualization, and network topology can affect which packets are observable.

6. Analyzing Existing PCAP Files

Offline PCAP analysis allows investigators to examine previously captured network traffic without continuously monitoring a live interface. This can be useful for incident response, security audits, and controlled training exercises.

PCAP files are commonly generated by packet analysis tools such as Wireshark and tcpdump.

Inspecting a Capture with Wireshark

Open the authorized PCAP file in Wireshark and examine the relevant protocols, endpoints, and authentication exchanges. Display filters can help narrow the investigation to specific protocols or conversations.

When reviewing a capture, pay particular attention to:

  • Services that use unencrypted or inadequately protected communication.
  • Authentication exchanges involving legacy protocols.
  • Unexpected connections to internal services.
  • Sensitive information accidentally included in application traffic.
  • Repeated authentication failures or unusual communication patterns.

Using PCredz for Offline Analysis

When using PCredz against an authorized capture, consult the current repository documentation for the supported command-line options.

The project's documented usage includes options for processing a capture file or a directory of captures. Confirm the precise syntax for your installed version before running an analysis.

After processing, store the results in a protected directory. Review the output carefully, because a discovered artifact may require additional context before it can be classified as a security finding.

Evidence-handling tip: Preserve the original capture, record its cryptographic hash when appropriate, document the analysis environment, and restrict access to extracted data. Avoid transferring confidential PCAP files to third-party systems unless that transfer is explicitly authorized.

7. PCredz and Hashcat: Understanding the Difference

PCredz and Hashcat serve different purposes in a security assessment.

PCredz identifies supported credential-related artifacts in captured network traffic. Hashcat is a password recovery and password-strength auditing tool that supports many hash formats.

Some authentication artifacts identified by PCredz may be suitable for further analysis with a compatible password-auditing tool. Compatibility depends on the exact artifact format, the protocol, and the supported mode in the installed version.

For example, Hashcat documents different modes for certain NTLM and Kerberos-related formats. A mode number must not be selected solely from a generic label: analysts should verify the exact format against the official documentation.

Hash analysis can help organizations determine whether their password policies resist common guessing attacks. A recovered password, however, does not by itself establish that an account is currently accessible or that the account has elevated privileges.

Official resource: Hashcat.

8. Security Risks and Defensive Measures

Credential exposure can allow an attacker to impersonate users, access internal services, or attempt further compromise. The actual risk depends on the credential type, account privileges, network architecture, and additional security controls.

Use Encrypted Protocols

Replace insecure protocols with appropriately configured encrypted alternatives. Use HTTPS for web applications and secure configurations for remote administration, email, and file transfer.

Strengthen Authentication

Use modern authentication mechanisms wherever possible. Disable obsolete authentication methods when they are no longer required, and enforce multifactor authentication for sensitive accounts and remote access.

Reduce Credential Reuse

Encourage unique passwords and use an approved password manager. Privileged accounts should have separate credentials and carefully controlled access.

Apply Least Privilege

Give users and services only the permissions they need. Segment sensitive systems and restrict unnecessary communication between network zones.

Monitor and Respond

Monitor authentication logs for suspicious access, repeated failures, unusual source systems, and unexpected use of privileged accounts. If credential exposure is confirmed, follow the incident response process, rotate affected credentials, and revoke compromised sessions where appropriate.

9. Common Misconceptions About PCredz

Does PCredz Crack Every Password?

No. PCredz is primarily used to identify supported artifacts in network traffic. Whether a password can be recovered depends on the data captured, the authentication protocol, and the availability of a compatible analysis method.

Can It Read Every HTTPS Password?

No. Properly configured HTTPS encrypts application traffic in transit. A normal packet capture generally cannot reveal the protected application contents simply because PCredz is being used.

Does Finding a Hash Mean an Account Is Compromised?

Not necessarily. A hash or authentication exchange must be assessed in context. Its security impact depends on the protocol, account status, password strength, and whether the artifact can be abused.

Is Live Capture Always Better Than Offline Analysis?

No. Live capture may help investigate current activity, while offline analysis is often more suitable for examining preserved evidence. The right approach depends on the investigation scope, authorization, and operational requirements.

10. Conclusion

PCredz is a useful tool for understanding credential exposure in network traffic. By examining authorized packet captures, cybersecurity professionals can identify authentication artifacts, investigate legacy protocols, and discover weaknesses that require remediation.

However, the value of PCredz goes beyond extracting data. Its findings can help organizations improve encryption, modernize authentication, reduce password reuse, and strengthen their incident response practices.

For anyone learning network security, the key takeaway is simple: understanding how authentication data moves across a network is essential to protecting it.

For more cybersecurity tutorials, ethical hacking resources, OSINT guides, and network security insights, visit Hackersking.

Topics covered: PCredz tutorial, PCredz Kali Linux, network credential analysis, PCAP analysis, network traffic analysis, NTLM authentication, Kerberos authentication, Hashcat, password security, ethical hacking tools, cybersecurity tools, incident response, network security, penetration testing, information security.
```

US Homeland Security Data Breach Exposes Personal Details of Over 41,000 Employees

By: Divya
29 October 2026 at 01:10

A newly disclosed data leak has exposed personal and professional information on more than 40,000 U.S. Department of Homeland Security employees, including personnel in surveillance, human intelligence, and undercover operations. Distributed Denial of Secrets announced the publication on October 28. It attributed the information to an entity calling itself β€œDepartment of Peace.” The reported exposure […]

The post US Homeland Security Data Breach Exposes Personal Details of Over 41,000 Employees appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

Hackers Exploit PHP2Shell Vulnerabilities to Gain Root Access on 25 Firewall Servers

By: Divya
29 October 2026 at 00:59

Hackers chained PHP2Shell vulnerabilities with a Linux kernel privilege escalation flaw to gain root access on 25 servers, including three systems associated with a United States government-affiliated environment, according to Dream researchers. Discovered on October 25, the operation progressed from exposed firewall management interfaces to credential theft, persistent tunneling, and Active Directory reconnaissance. Dream recovered […]

The post Hackers Exploit PHP2Shell Vulnerabilities to Gain Root Access on 25 Firewall Servers appeared first on GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform.

Yesterday β€” 28 October 2026Main stream

Ethereum Researchers Explore Transaction Assertions to Reduce Signing Risks

28 October 2026 at 18:00

TL;DR: Ethereum Foundation researchers are examining native transaction assertions that could make transaction safety depend on the final state as well as the signed instructions. The official source also identifies specific limits or future steps, so implementation and market impact should not be assumed.

Ethereum Foundation researchers are examining native transaction assertions that could make transaction safety depend on the final state as well as the signed instructions. For digital-asset markets, the important issue is less the announcement in isolation than the channel through which it could affect users, capital or network activity. The latest development deserves attention, but its relevance depends on the facts published by the organisation behind it and the work still required to make it matter.

What the primary announcement establishes

The foundation describes blind signing and uncertain execution outcomes as distinct ways users can approve actions with unwanted results. The research explores checks that inspect net balance, storage or code changes after execution and revert the transaction if a required rule fails.

EIP-7906 is a possible route, using a read-only post-transaction frame to evaluate changes and events before accepting the outcome. The foundation states that EIP-7906 is under consideration, not yet confirmed for a future upgrade, and would still require wallets or protocols to enforce a rule.

Why this could matter for crypto markets

A transaction signature proves authorisation of certain bytes; it does not by itself guarantee that a complex smart-contract interaction achieves the signer’s economic objective. Independent checks over final balances or approvals could narrow that gap. Yet they introduce design choices about who defines the rule, how much gas it costs and whether third-party software can silently omit it.

Blockchain infrastructure does not improve in a vacuum. Engineers must consider existing applications, node operators, client compatibility and how errors behave under stressed conditions. A change that appears straightforward at the protocol level can create a demanding coordination problem. That distinction matters to investors trying to separate a plausible structural change from a headline that may not immediately move price or onchain activity.

The limits of the headline

This is research and proposal-level work, not a new safety guarantee available for ordinary Ethereum transactions today. Assertions sourced from a compromised interface could still encode a harmful outcome.

Performance claims also require careful definitions. Throughput, finality, responsiveness, cost and fault tolerance are different measurements. Improving one does not automatically improve all of them, especially when a wallet, exchange or application adds its own confirmations.

The wider context

Ethereum native transaction assertions sits within a wider shift toward wallet security. This area has a recurring challenge: the benefits are easiest to describe before the operational details are complete. Different stakeholders measure success differently. A user wants clarity and predictable access; an operator wants reliable controls and manageable costs; an institution wants accountability if something fails. Those perspectives can be in tension, and the source announcement should be read with that in mind.

The distinction also shapes how to read future updates. A new partnership, proposal or software version is a verifiable milestone. Adoption, consistent performance and financial effects require additional evidence. That is why follow-up reporting should distinguish released features, planned features and measured use rather than combining them into one claim.

What to watch next

Watch for EIP governance, wallet implementations, protocol support and testing of the proposed state-difference opcodes.

The operational test comes after the proposal or release note: can different client teams implement it, can developers upgrade safely and can users rely on it when activity spikes? That is the difference between an attractive design and durable infrastructure. The next evidence should come from official implementation updates and measurable outcomes, not from assuming that a news release guarantees adoption or a token-price response.

Primary source: Ethereum native transaction assertions (published 2026-10-05).

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

DHS bans Swiss cyber firm from federal systems

DHS's new order banning Acronis AG from federal systems also sheds new light on security concerns U.S. officials have about the company's products and services.

Β© AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais

FILE - The Department of Homeland Security logo is seen during a news conference in Washington, Feb. 25, 2015. DHS says a looming Supreme Court decision on abortion, an increase of migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border and the midterm elections are potential triggers for extremist violence over the next six months. DHS said June 7, 2022, in the National Terrorism Advisory System bulletin the U.S. was in a "heightened threat environment" already and these factors may worsen the situation. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

Nine ways the Pentagon can fix CMMC without lowering the cybersecurity bar

Russia and Ukraine are already demonstrating how quickly AI, autonomous systems, and software can move from development to operational use.

Β© The Associated Press

FILE - Ukrainian servicemen prepare a "Chaklun" strike drone used for deep-strike operations against Russian positions in Crimea, in an undisclosed location in Ukraine, Aug. 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Dan Bashakov, File)

Massive Leak Exposes 41,000 Homeland Security Workersβ€”Including Undercover ICE Agents

The leaked records include the locations of ICE and CBP facilities, workers’ cell phone numbers, and the members of groups tied to wiretap programs, Palantir software, and xAI’s Grok chatbot.

Wiz’s CTO on PHP2Shell and the coming β€˜vulnpocalypse’

28 October 2026 at 15:05
The PHP scare may have faded from your feed, but the cleanup is far from over. Last week, two critical bugs in the open source language behind roughly 70% of websites left organizations scrambling to fix their systems, with some taking sites offline until the vulnerabilities could be patched. According to researchers who found the […]
❌
❌