❌

Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdayNewsBTC

Zcash Fund Draws $15.2 Million As October Flows Stay Negative

23 October 2026 at 05:45

TL;DR: Farside’s Zcash table records a $15.2 million inflow for ZCSH on October 21. Two positive sessions improved the recent picture, but the displayed October 2–21 period still totals $70.5 million of net withdrawals.

Demand returned to the Zcash investment product tracked under ticker ZCSH on Wednesday, producing its strongest positive session in the October dates displayed by Farside Investors.

The research firm’s flow table records $15.2 million in net inflows for October 21, following $1.6 million the previous day. Combined, the two sessions brought in $16.8 million.

That improvement comes after several withdrawals earlier in the month. Adding the observations shown from October 2 through October 21 produces a net outflow of $70.5 million. The calculation covers those displayed dates, rather than claiming a complete calendar-month total.

A Fund Flow Is A Narrower Signal Than Network Demand

The product’s ticker appears in Grayscale Zcash Trust’s August SEC filing, which described the planned listing and name change. That filing provides background on the vehicle; it is not the source of Wednesday’s daily flow estimate.

The current reading comes from Farside’s compiled dataset. It should be attributed as such, rather than represented as a fresh issuer filing or an independently audited record of every purchase of ZEC.

Investment-product subscriptions can be a useful measure of demand through brokerage channels. They do not show all buying across exchanges, identify the investors making the allocations or measure the use of Zcash’s privacy features.

They also differ from trading volume in the fund’s shares. Shares can change hands between investors without the same dollar amount entering the vehicle as new capital. That is why a flow figure and a busy trading session need not tell the same story.

Wednesday’s inflow is meaningful against the recent sequence because it adds a second positive observation after net selling. The larger period remains negative, so describing it as a complete reversal in October demand would go beyond the numbers.

The next comparison is with subsequent fund-flow observations, not an assumed reaction in the token price. The two-day improvement can be reported on its own without assigning it to a particular network announcement or market narrative.

Related Reading

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

KuCoin Adds USDT Perpetuals Tied To Stocks And ETFs

23 October 2026 at 04:15

TL;DR: KuCoin announced five new USDT-margined perpetual contracts for October 21, including products tracking Goldman Sachs shares and the leveraged MSTU ETF. The contracts offer up to 20x leverage in supported markets.

KuCoin is extending its derivatives menu further into traditional financial assets with five contracts scheduled for launch on Wednesday.

The exchange’s official listing notice names URNMUSDT, GSUSDT, MSTUUSDT, FWDIUSDT and USDEXUSDT. It sets a 09:00 UTC October 21 start and advertises leverage of up to 20 times, subject to regional availability.

Although KuCoin groups the products under a stock-index label, the disclosed references include individual companies and exchange-traded funds. They cover the Sprott Uranium Miners ETF, Goldman Sachs, the T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF, Forward Industries and StablecoinX.

Price Exposure Without Share Ownership

A perpetual contract provides exposure to movements in its reference price. Buying one does not mean acquiring the underlying share or fund unit, and the economic result depends on the derivative’s own terms.

That distinction becomes particularly important for MSTU. The reference fund itself targets leveraged daily exposure to Strategy shares. A leveraged contract tracking that fund adds another layer of sensitivity; it is not equivalent to simply holding a conventional unleveraged stock position.

The 20x figure is an advertised maximum for the contracts, not a description of the risk every account will necessarily take. Position size, margin, liquidation rules and changes in the underlying price determine the exposure of an individual trade.

KuCoin lists round-the-clock trading and funding settlements every eight hours for the five contracts. That creates a calendar mismatch: the derivatives can remain active when the reference securities’ home markets are closed. The reference-price methodology matters particularly during those gaps.

Wednesday’s notice establishes the planned product additions and their stated specifications. It does not establish the depth of their order books or demonstrate that a large position could be entered and exited at a quoted price.

The practical expansion is access to more equity-linked exposures through USDT-margined contracts, with the risks of both the reference asset and the derivatives structure attached.

Related Reading

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

Ethereum ETFs Break Five-Day Outflow Run With $14.9 Million Inflows

22 October 2026 at 11:10

TL;DR: Ethereum ETFs returned to net inflows on October 21 after five negative sessions. The $14.9 million gain was modest, with Grayscale and Fidelity offsetting continued withdrawals from BlackRock’s ETHA.

The losing streak ended. The recovery in Ethereum fund demand was considerably less decisive.

US spot Ether ETFs recorded $14.9 million in net inflows on Wednesday, Farside Investors’ figures show. Grayscale’s ETH product brought in $28.1 million and Fidelity’s FETH added $13 million, while BlackRock’s ETHA lost $29.3 million.

Smaller positive readings from Bitwise, Franklin and Morgan Stanley helped leave the overall total above zero. The other listed products recorded no net movement.

A Positive Session After A $388.9 Million Drain

The five preceding trading days, October 14 through October 20, produced combined withdrawals of $388.9 million. Wednesday recovered approximately 3.8% of that sum, based on the same table.

That makes the change in direction useful without making it a full repair. The aggregate turned positive because subscriptions at some providers exceeded redemptions at another, rather than because every major fund began attracting money simultaneously.

Issuer differences deserve attention. Investors can move between competing products, change portfolio exposure or manage positions for reasons a daily aggregate does not disclose. The data establishes the net result; it cannot identify the motives of the underlying accounts.

The Next Test Is Persistence

For Ethereum, a small inflow after sustained withdrawals removes one immediate source of pressure. It does not settle the larger question of whether demand for the investment products is rebuilding.

A stronger recovery would involve repeated positive totals, with contributions from more than a narrow set of funds. Continued redemptions at a large product could still outweigh subscriptions elsewhere, as the recent sequence demonstrates.

Fund flows also need to be kept separate from network activity. ETF subscriptions measure demand for a particular investment wrapper. They do not directly measure Ethereum transaction fees, staking participation or how much value applications settle.

Wednesday’s session therefore changes the description from an uninterrupted outflow run to an uneven pause in selling. The next few daily reports will show whether that pause develops into something more durable.

Related Reading

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

Bitcoin ETFs Draw $524.8 Million As BlackRock And Fidelity Lead

22 October 2026 at 10:30

TL;DR: US spot Bitcoin ETFs attracted $524.8 million on October 21, according to Farside Investors. BlackRock and Fidelity supplied most of the inflow, extending a three-session run of net buying.

Bitcoin’s US exchange-traded funds recorded another half-billion-dollar session on Wednesday, with buying spread across more issuers than during the start of the week.

Farside Investors’ daily table puts October 21 net inflows at $524.8 million. BlackRock’s IBIT received $235 million and Fidelity’s FBTC added $212.7 million. Together, those two products accounted for approximately 85.3% of the total, calculated from the published figures.

A Broader Day Of Buying

Grayscale’s GBTC and Bitcoin Mini Trust, Bitwise’s BITB, Ark’s ARKB and Franklin’s EZBC also recorded positive flows. None of the funds in the table showed a net withdrawal for the session.

The latest result takes the October 19–21 total to $1.0747 billion. That calculation combines Monday’s $526.7 million, Tuesday’s $23.2 million and Wednesday’s $524.8 million.

For an ETF market often dominated by a single issuer, participation matters alongside the headline dollar amount. A large allocation to one product can reflect a particular client’s decision. Positive readings across several competing funds suggest that the day’s buying was less narrowly concentrated, even though the largest two still did most of the work.

Flows And Price Answer Different Questions

Net fund flows measure money entering or leaving the investment vehicles. They do not capture every Bitcoin trade, reveal each buyer’s holding period or establish that an investor has no offsetting position elsewhere.

That distinction limits what Wednesday’s number can tell traders about the next price move. Strong ETF demand can coexist with selling from other holders, and a daily creation figure is not a timetable for when every underlying coin was purchased.

The useful comparison is now whether the buying continues across multiple sessions and issuers. Wednesday improved both the size and breadth of reported demand. It still leaves the durability of that demand to subsequent trading days.

Related Reading

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

❌
❌