CertiK to provide security tools and mentorship to Web3 startups through Arbitrum program

With the advent of blockchain technology, the way transactions and records in the digital world are handled has been revolutionized. Rather than being dependent solely on the central authority, blockchain technology allows multiple parties to manage and verify shared records using the decentralized nature of the blockchain network.
While a lot of applications have been built on existing blockchain platforms, some require an extra blockchain due to technical reasons or for other concerns. While there are advantages to creating an extra blockchain, certain aspects must be considered.
It is important to understand the pros and cons of using an independent blockchain to determine its viability.
Running one’s own blockchain network consists of setting up a blockchain protocol that has its own settings, validation system, and operational principles. Depending on the type of blockchain network, a token of its own, special validators, and governance system may be part of it as well.
In general, blockchain networks are based on various participation types. In public blockchain networks, anyone can participate, whereas in private networks, only approved entities participate in the network operations. In consortium blockchain networks, various organizations operate the network.
Different participation types bring various challenges in terms of transparency, management, decentralization, and security. The correct approach depends on the application area.
An independent blockchain gives the freedom to design its protocol rules based on some particular demands. They could include the validation of transactions, block creation, fees, and updates to the software.
For instance, an organization-specific blockchain would favor the accessibility and predictability of transactions. On the other hand, the demands of a public blockchain may include the open nature and anti-censorship features.
Flexibility is advantageous when the application’s demands are in disagreement with the pre-existing design of the blockchain. But increased control translates into increased responsibility too.
Consensus algorithms enable the participating nodes in the blockchain network to reach an agreement about the state of the blockchain. There exist different algorithms that provide different tradeoffs between security, efficiency, energy usage, and decentralization.
Proof of Stake utilizes incentives and validators. Proof of Authority makes use of validators, whereas Byzantine Fault Tolerant algorithms assist in reaching agreements among a group of nodes under certain failure scenarios.
Each consensus algorithm impacts transaction confirmation and the network’s response to disruptions differently. There isn’t a consensus algorithm that would suit all situations and is the best in all of them.
Fees for transactions on public blockchains can be subject to change depending on the level of demand on the network. The benefit of an independent blockchain is that there will be more flexibility with respect to the setting of the fees and how the transactions can be processed.
Some examples of fee structures include fixed parameters, dynamic fees, or other ways of paying for transaction fees. In any case, low transaction fees do not mean the absence of costs incurred by the network itself.
Depending on its structure, the standalone blockchain could create rules concerning who is allowed to become node operators, process transactions, or gain access to specific records.
This can prove helpful where there are several organizations that want to maintain a common ledger, but within certain participation policies. Permissioned blockchain systems allow restricting transaction validation operations to particular participants.
However, there are also downsides to introducing participation control. The greater control over participation can lead to less openness and decentralization, so the blockchain design should suit user needs.
The blockchain being created is not guaranteed security because of the existing network since it depends on many other factors such as the design of the protocols, the number of validators, the implementation, and the resources that will be used to secure the system.
A smaller number of validators makes coordination easier but may be more prone to collusion or service disruption. Poor consensus and software bugs may cause problems with transactions and availability of the network.
In order to ensure security, there should be extensive testing, code review and vulnerabilities detection.
It is not sufficient to have software that generates blocks. Communication between nodes needs to take place, transactions need to be verified, and data in the network should be accessible.
Running one’s own blockchain network also entails planning for software updates, back-ups, monitoring, recovery, and compatibility between different versions of the protocol.
All of this should take place even after the launch of the blockchain network. Otherwise, the network might experience problems in the future.
The operation of a blockchain can be significantly user-dependent. A newly developed blockchain would not possess as many integrations, tools for developers, liquidity, and community engagement as a preexisting platform.
Participation can take time to build up. Lack of participation may limit the functionalities of the network and make it challenging to have a properly decentralized validation community.
The linking of different blockchains can pose technical problems. It can include bridging, messaging systems, and other types of interoperability solutions which each comes with its own set of security issues.
Governance is also an issue that needs to be thought about. The blockchain needs a way for participants to propose and pass new protocols. Different opinions on upgrades and network policies can slow down decision making, sometimes resulting in diverging chains.
Maintaining a private blockchain network provides increased autonomy in relation to the rules of the network, its consensus algorithm, transaction costs, and participants. Yet, it entails constant spending on security, infrastructure, maintenance, and ecosystem development.
The decision to maintain one’s own blockchain network should be based on the requirements and needs of the business. With careful consideration of both strengths and weaknesses, businesses will be able to assess whether it is necessary to develop their own blockchain network or opt for an existing platform.
Exploring the Benefits and Limitations of Running Your Own Blockchain Network was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Acquiring users is one of the biggest challenges for crypto startups. Whether you are launching a cryptocurrency token, building a DeFi platform, developing a Web3 application, or preparing for a Token Generation Event (TGE), attracting the right audience requires a clear marketing strategy and careful budget management.
Many crypto projects spend heavily on influencer promotions, paid advertising, community campaigns, and exchange-related marketing without understanding which activities generate genuine users. High traffic and growing social media followers may look promising, but they do not always translate into wallet connections, product adoption, token participation, or long-term engagement.
Reducing user acquisition costs for crypto startups requires improving audience targeting, choosing cost-effective marketing channels, optimizing conversion rates, and retaining users after their first interaction. Instead of focusing exclusively on attracting more people, startups should identify the marketing activities that bring relevant users at a sustainable cost.
This guide explains how crypto startups can reduce user acquisition costs, improve marketing efficiency, and build a scalable user acquisition strategy.
User acquisition cost (UAC) is the amount a business spends to acquire a new user through its marketing and growth activities. It helps crypto startups evaluate whether their campaigns are generating users efficiently.
A closely related metric is Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC), which generally measures the cost of acquiring a paying customer. For crypto projects, the most useful metric depends on the business model and the desired action.
For example, a DeFi platform may measure the cost of acquiring an active wallet, while a blockchain gaming project may track the cost of acquiring a player who returns regularly.
The basic formula is:
User Acquisition Cost = Total Acquisition Spend ÷ Number of New Users Acquired
Suppose a crypto startup spends $12,000 on marketing and acquires 600 new users during a campaign.
User acquisition cost = $12,000 ÷ 600 = $20 per user.
However, this calculation is meaningful only when the startup defines what counts as a user and which expenses belong in the calculation. A registered account, connected wallet, funded wallet, and retained user represent different levels of engagement.
Projects should track these actions separately to understand the actual cost of attracting valuable users.
Crypto marketing presents several challenges that can increase acquisition expenses.
Intense competition: New tokens, DeFi applications, exchanges, and Web3 platforms compete for attention across similar online communities and marketing channels.
Audience trust issues: Potential users may hesitate to interact with unfamiliar crypto projects because of scams, misleading promotions, security concerns, and unclear token utility.
Advertising restrictions: Cryptocurrency advertising is subject to platform-specific rules and may require approvals, disclosures, or geographic restrictions.
Low-quality traffic: Influencer campaigns and paid promotions can generate clicks without attracting users who are genuinely interested in the product.
Short-term campaign thinking: Some startups prioritize launch-day visibility instead of building a repeatable acquisition process that continues after the initial campaign.
Understanding these challenges helps startups allocate their marketing budgets more effectively.
One of the most effective ways to reduce user acquisition costs is to identify the audience most likely to use your product.
Marketing to everyone interested in cryptocurrency can waste resources because different audiences have different motivations, expectations, and levels of product knowledge.
For example, a DeFi lending platform may target experienced DeFi users who understand liquidity pools and collateralization. A crypto wallet may appeal to retail users, traders, developers, or businesses looking for specific wallet functionality.
Create an audience profile that identifies:
Use customer interviews, community discussions, product analytics, and search data to validate your assumptions.
A clearly defined target audience allows your crypto marketing team to select relevant channels, create better messaging, and avoid spending money on users who are unlikely to convert.
Website traffic is useful, but not every visitor has the same potential value. Someone researching general blockchain concepts may be less likely to adopt your product than someone comparing crypto wallets or evaluating DeFi platforms.
Crypto startups should identify the search queries, communities, and campaign interactions that indicate stronger intent.
For example, content targeting queries such as “how to choose a crypto wallet for a DeFi platform” may attract users with a specific need. A detailed comparison page can then explain the product’s features, supported networks, security considerations, and limitations.
To attract high-intent users:
This approach shifts the focus from maximizing visits to attracting users who are more likely to benefit from your solution.
Crypto SEO can reduce dependence on paid campaigns by helping your website attract relevant users through organic search.
Unlike a short promotional campaign, useful search content can continue attracting visitors after publication, although rankings and traffic are never guaranteed.
Start with keyword research focused on the problems your product solves. Build content around product categories, use cases, comparisons, technical questions, and common user concerns.
For example, a crypto exchange could publish guides on exchange security, trading features, wallet transfers, and supported blockchain networks. A token development company could create resources explaining token standards, smart contract audits, tokenomics, and deployment costs.
A strong crypto SEO strategy should include:
SEO works best when content provides genuine value rather than repeating keywords. It can attract users earlier in their decision-making journey and help reduce the long-term cost of acquiring organic traffic.
Many crypto users need more information before trusting a new platform or token project. Content marketing can address this hesitation by explaining the product, demonstrating its value, and answering common questions.
Create content that matches different stages of the user journey.
Awareness stage: Publish introductory guides, educational videos, industry explainers, and problem-focused articles.
Consideration stage: Develop comparison pages, product walkthroughs, technical documentation, case studies, and detailed FAQs.
Conversion stage: Provide onboarding guides, product demonstrations, feature explanations, and clear next steps.
For Web3 startups, content can also support community discussions, email campaigns, influencer partnerships, and AI search visibility.
Avoid publishing content solely to increase article count. Each asset should address a specific user question and guide readers toward a relevant next step.
Measure content performance through qualified organic traffic, assisted conversions, product activation, and returning users rather than page views alone.
Crypto influencer marketing can generate awareness quickly, but poorly matched partnerships can increase user acquisition costs.
A creator with a large following may not reach the people who need your product. Audience relevance, credibility, engagement quality, and campaign objectives are more useful selection criteria than follower count alone.
Before choosing an influencer, evaluate:
Use unique campaign links, referral codes, and appropriate attribution methods to measure results. Track meaningful actions such as qualified registrations, product activation, and retained users.
Start with a controlled pilot before committing a large portion of your marketing budget. Compare performance across creators and scale partnerships that demonstrate relevant outcomes.
All paid promotions should comply with applicable advertising rules, platform policies, and disclosure requirements. Avoid misleading claims about token prices, guaranteed returns, or investment outcomes.
A well-managed community can support user acquisition by helping potential users understand the product, receive answers, and engage with the project over time.
Crypto startups commonly use Telegram, Discord, X, and relevant developer forums to communicate with their audiences. The best channel depends on the project’s users and purpose.
However, community size alone is not a reliable measure of acquisition success. Thousands of inactive members may generate less value than a smaller group of people who actively use the product and provide useful feedback.
To build a stronger community:
Community managers should also maintain transparent communication during delays, product changes, and security incidents.
Measure active participation, onboarding completion, returning users, support resolution, and community-driven referrals. These metrics help identify whether community marketing is contributing to sustainable growth.
Even well-targeted traffic can become expensive when a website fails to convert visitors into users.
A confusing landing page, unclear product benefits, complicated onboarding process, or missing security information can prevent interested visitors from taking action.
Start by reviewing your most important conversion pages. Make the product’s purpose clear, explain its primary benefits, and provide a visible call to action.
Effective crypto landing pages should include:
Run controlled A/B tests on headlines, calls to action, page layouts, and onboarding steps. Change one important variable at a time when practical so you can interpret the results.
For example, if 2,000 visitors produce 40 completed registrations, the registration conversion rate is 2%. If a tested page produces 60 registrations from the same number of visitors, the conversion rate becomes 3%.
If acquisition spending remains constant, the cost per registration decreases because more users complete the desired action.
The key is to improve conversions without making exaggerated promises or hiding important information.
Referral marketing can help crypto startups reach new audiences through existing users. When users understand the product and have a positive experience, they may introduce it to relevant peers or communities.
A referral program can reward qualifying actions, but incentives should be designed carefully to avoid fake accounts, referral abuse, and low-quality registrations.
Consider the following practices:
Strategic partnerships can also reduce acquisition costs by connecting your product with established audiences. Potential partners may include complementary Web3 applications, developer communities, blockchain ecosystems, and relevant educational platforms.
Choose partnerships based on audience fit and mutual value rather than the number of promotional announcements.
Sustainable growth requires more than simply acquiring new users. If users leave shortly after registering, the startup must continually spend money replacing them.
Retention-focused improvements can make existing acquisition spending more productive.
Begin by identifying where users abandon onboarding. Review product analytics, support requests, surveys, and user interviews to understand the obstacles.
Depending on your product, improvements may include:
Track activation rates, repeat usage, cohort retention, and relevant product outcomes. The right retention metric depends on the business model.
For example, a blockchain gaming platform may track returning players, while a DeFi application may measure repeat protocol interactions and retained active wallets.
Better retention does not automatically lower the initial cost of acquiring a user, but it can reduce the need for repeated replacement campaigns and improve the long-term value generated by each acquired user.
Reducing user acquisition costs requires reliable measurement. Without consistent tracking, a startup may continue investing in campaigns that generate attention but fail to produce meaningful outcomes.
Build a dashboard that connects marketing sources with the actions users take after arriving.
Important KPIs include:

Separate paid, organic, influencer, referral, and community-driven acquisition wherever possible. Use consistent attribution rules and account for the limitations of cross-device tracking and privacy restrictions.
For crypto projects, on-chain data may complement website analytics, but wallet activity does not necessarily identify unique individuals. A connected wallet is not always an active customer, and transaction volume alone does not prove sustainable adoption.
Review campaign performance regularly and reallocate spending based on verified results.
There is no need for startups to activate every marketing channel simultaneously. A phased strategy can help teams validate assumptions before increasing expenditure.
Define the target audience, identify the primary conversion event, research acquisition channels, and establish baseline metrics.
Run small campaigns across selected channels, publish high-intent content, test landing pages, and evaluate audience quality.
Identify weak conversion points, improve onboarding, refine targeting, and stop campaigns that consistently fail to meet agreed objectives.
Increase investment in channels that produce qualified, activated, and retained users at acceptable costs. Continue testing new opportunities instead of assuming past results will remain constant.
This approach allows crypto startups to make decisions based on evidence rather than marketing hype.
Reducing user acquisition costs for crypto startups requires a coordinated strategy that combines audience research, crypto SEO, content marketing, influencer partnerships, community building, conversion optimization, and user retention.
The most effective approach is not necessarily to spend less on every channel. It is to invest in the activities that consistently attract relevant users and help them achieve meaningful outcomes.
Start by defining your ideal audience, measuring the complete acquisition journey, and identifying where users drop off. Then improve the channels and experiences that have the greatest impact on growth.
At INORU, we help crypto and Web3 businesses develop marketing strategies that support brand visibility, community engagement, user acquisition, and long-term ecosystem growth. With the right combination of data-driven marketing and continuous optimization, your startup can make better use of its budget and build a more sustainable path to adoption.
Crypto startups can reduce user acquisition costs by targeting high-intent audiences, investing in SEO, improving landing-page conversion rates, choosing relevant influencers, building engaged communities, and measuring cost per activated user instead of focusing only on traffic or registrations.
There is no universal benchmark for a good crypto user acquisition cost. It depends on the product, target market, acquisition channel, revenue model, and user quality. Startups should establish their own benchmarks and compare acquisition costs with activation, retention, and long-term user value.
Crypto SEO, educational content, community marketing, referrals, and relevant partnerships can be cost-effective when they attract users who remain engaged. Influencer marketing and paid advertising may also work, but performance depends on audience fit, campaign quality, and compliance with platform policies.
Startups should track total acquisition spending, new users, activated users, conversion rates, retention, and channel-specific performance. Analytics tools, campaign tracking links, referral codes, and carefully interpreted on-chain data can help connect marketing activity with user behavior.
Crypto SEO helps startups attract users through organic search without paying for every individual click. Helpful content, relevant landing pages, strong technical SEO, and clear internal linking can improve discoverability and support long-term acquisition, although organic rankings and traffic are not guaranteed.
Retention helps startups understand whether acquired users find ongoing value in their products. Better retention can reduce dependence on replacement campaigns and improve the long-term value generated by marketing, although it does not necessarily reduce the initial cost of acquiring each user.
A startup should consider scaling when it has reliable tracking, a clear understanding of its target audience, repeatable acquisition results, acceptable conversion and retention metrics, and sufficient product capacity to support additional users. Increasing spend before validating these factors can amplify inefficiencies.
How to Reduce User Acquisition Costs for Crypto Startups was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.