OPM details expectations for new RIF rules

Β© AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

Β© AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein
Anthropic says researchers used Claude for biological work that could support weapons development, exposing new challenges for AI safeguards.
The post Anthropic Says Claude Used in Possible Bioweapon Research appeared first on TechRepublic.
Anthropic says researchers used Claude for biological work that could support weapons development, exposing new challenges for AI safeguards.
The post Anthropic Says Claude Used in Possible Bioweapon Research appeared first on TechRepublic.
California creates standards and a registry for independent AI assessors. Learn what the new framework could mean for businesses and IT leaders.
The post California Establishes Framework for Independent AI Assessors appeared first on TechRepublic.
ENISA has gained access to Anthropicβs Mythos 5, giving EU officials a chance to independently test the cyber AI after months of negotiations.
The post EU Gets Access to Anthropic Cyber AI β But Not Its Newest Model appeared first on TechRepublic.
California creates standards and a registry for independent AI assessors. Learn what the new framework could mean for businesses and IT leaders.
The post California Establishes Framework for Independent AI Assessors appeared first on TechRepublic.
ENISA has gained access to Anthropicβs Mythos 5, giving EU officials a chance to independently test the cyber AI after months of negotiations.
The post EU Gets Access to Anthropic Cyber AI β But Not Its Newest Model appeared first on TechRepublic.
CISAβs ChatGPT incident exposes a growing AI governance gap as enterprises struggle to define who is accountable for actions taken by AI agents.
The post CISAβs ChatGPT Incident Exposes a Bigger AI Governance Problem appeared first on TechRepublic.
CISAβs ChatGPT incident exposes a growing AI governance gap as enterprises struggle to define who is accountable for actions taken by AI agents.
The post CISAβs ChatGPT Incident Exposes a Bigger AI Governance Problem appeared first on TechRepublic.

Amazon named cybersecurity veteran Kevin Mandia to its board of directors, adding new security expertise a few months after former NSA director Keith Alexander stepped down.
Mandia founded Mandiant, the breach-investigation firm Google acquired for $5.4 billion in 2022, and remained at the search giant as a strategic advisor through July 2025, according to his LinkedIn profile. He now leads Armadin, an AI security startup he started last year.
Amazon said in its announcement that βcybersecurity is one of the most consequential risks and responsibilities organizations face today, and the threat landscape continues to evolve rapidly alongside advances in AI.β
Amazon added a cybersecurity specialist to its board in 2020, when it elected Alexander, who also led U.S. Cyber Command. Mandia comes from the other side of the field, with two decades spent investigating corporate breaches rather than defending government networks.
His appointment also puts an AI security entrepreneur on the board of a company whose cloud infrastructure underpins much of the internet. Armadin, founded in September 2025, uses AI to run attacks against corporate networks, probing defenses the way an intruder would.
The boardβs Security Committee, which oversees Amazonβs cybersecurity policies and its response to significant cyber incidents, is now chaired by Dan Huttenlocher, dean of the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing. Mandia joins as a member, along with former Bridgewater co-CEO Jon Rubinstein.
Amazon also named Mandia to the boardβs Audit Committee, according to a securities filing.
Mandia received 4,086 restricted stock units in connection with his election to the board, vesting in three equal annual installments beginning Nov. 15, 2027, the filing shows. The shares were worth about $1.03 million at Amazonβs closing price Wednesday.
The filing disclosed that his sister-in-law, Kristin Mandia, is an Amazon employee with an annual salary of $185,000. The company said her compensation is consistent with that of other employees at her level with similar responsibilities.
OpenAI says its AI solved the NavierβStokes problem in 88 hours, but questions about research credit and customer data have sparked a dispute.
The post OpenAI Claims NavierβStokes Breakthrough, Sparking Research Dispute appeared first on TechRepublic.
OpenAI says its AI solved the NavierβStokes problem in 88 hours, but questions about research credit and customer data have sparked a dispute.
The post OpenAI Claims NavierβStokes Breakthrough, Sparking Research Dispute appeared first on TechRepublic.

Β© Getty Images/Rawf8
Australia plans to let social media users choose algorithmic or follow-only feeds under new digital safety rules targeting platform design and control.
The post Australia Proposes to Make Social Media Algorithms Optional appeared first on TechRepublic.
Australia plans to let social media users choose algorithmic or follow-only feeds under new digital safety rules targeting platform design and control.
The post Australia Proposes to Make Social Media Algorithms Optional appeared first on TechRepublic.
Aave governance is considering an emergency Guardian powers proposal that would allow vulnerable lending pools to be frozen quickly during active security threats, without requiring immediate public write-ups.
It is a slightly uncomfortable proposal, and that is exactly why it matters.
On one hand, DeFi users want transparency. On the other hand, publishing too much detail during an active exploit can hand attackers a roadmap. Aave contributors are trying to solve that tension: how do you act fast enough to protect users without making governance feel opaque?
The proposal does not allow guardians to seize user funds or liquidate deposits. It is about emergency freeze powers.
For more details, visit the official Governance platform.
DeFi moves fast when things go wrong.
A bug, oracle issue, bad debt event, or market manipulation attack can escalate in minutes. Waiting for a full public governance process is not always realistic when funds are at risk.
That is why many large protocols use emergency roles.
These roles are supposed to pause, freeze, or limit certain functions while the team or DAO investigates. The difficult part is designing those powers so they are strong enough to protect users, but narrow enough that they cannot be abused.
Aaveβs proposal sits right in that design problem.
The public-notice question is the most interesting part.
In normal conditions, users should expect clear explanations. If a market is frozen, people want to know why. They want to understand whether their funds are safe and when normal operations may resume.
During an active exploit, though, immediate disclosure can be dangerous.
If the issue is not fully contained, a public write-up may expose technical details that help attackers move faster. That is the argument behind delaying some disclosures until the threat is under control.
It is not an easy trade-off.
Aave is one of DeFiβs core lending protocols.
That means its risk controls matter beyond one market. Aave deployments sit across multiple chains and assets, with users relying on the protocol for borrowing, lending, collateral management, and liquidity.
Emergency response is not a side issue.
It is part of the protocolβs safety design. If governance cannot respond quickly enough, users can suffer. If emergency powers are too broad, users may worry about centralization.
Finding the middle ground is the hard part.
The proposal should not be exaggerated.
It does not mean Aave guardians can take user funds. It does not mean deposits can be seized. It does not mean liquidations can be manually forced outside protocol rules.
The proposal is about freezing vulnerable markets during emergencies.
That distinction is important because βemergency powersβ can sound scarier than the actual mechanism.
Aaveβs discussion shows how mature DeFi protocols are thinking about crisis management.
Early DeFi loved pure automation. Over time, protocols learned that some emergency controls may be necessary, especially when billions of dollars are at stake. The question is how to make those controls accountable.
The best version of this proposal would protect users during live threats while preserving post-incident transparency.
That is the balance Aave governance now has to debate.
This article draws on Aave governance materials relating to the emergency Guardian powers proposal.
This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.
This report is based on information released by Governance. at Governance


Β© The Associated Press

Β© The Associated Press
G20 members backed a U.S.-led approach favoring existing regulators over new AI watchdogs, but major differences over oversight and safety remain.
The post G20 Backs U.S. Push to Avoid New AI Regulators appeared first on TechRepublic.