As FDM printers keep getting faster, we are forced to deal with a range of bottlenecks, all of which conspire to hold us back from another Benchie world record. A major physical limitation is that of flowrate, as the hotend has to be able to melt the filament that enters the nozzle before it departs said nozzle. One attempt to make a high-flow nozzle involves splitting the material path into three winding sections, which theoretically should help said flowrate. Recently [Thomas Sanladerer] took a poke at this and other types of nozzle with SLS-printed nozzles.

These printed parts still needed some finishing on the lathe, including drilling the 0.4 mm nozzle hole. The finished nozzles feature a variety of internal geometries, including the aforementioned triple-path, as well as many with various intrusions that seek to maximize the contact area.

Using a Prusa Core One these nozzles were subsequently tested to see what print quality they produced at high flow rates. A special test rig to test the nozzle pressure was also used to further characterize them, as this indicates at which flowrate the nozzle begins to struggle. Among these the Fuge design did the best, though with the big asterisk that these nozzles were printed in MS1, which is in effect tool steel and thus not great for being nozzles.

When it comes to 3D printing in the FDM world, you can go a long way just relying on standard settings that ship with your 3D printer and/or slicer. If you want to push the limits, though, it pays to better understand the hardware and materials you’re working with to know what you can get away with. To that end, [Robert Samples] put together the MeltCalc database to help. 

The purpose of MeltCalc is simple—it collates data on hot ends and materials regarding factors like maximum flow rate, print speeds, and heater requirements. If you’re wondering whether a given hot end can flow a given filament at a given rate, for example, this tool is a great place to start. It features 64 different hot ends and 36 polymers typically used in the 3D printing world, and can spit out maximum flow rates and print speed estimations even accounting for fancy tech like Core Heating Technology (CHT) nozzles. It’s all based on thermodynamic modelling which [Robert] put together based on his experience as a chemist who works with polymers. His aim was to provide a tool with realistic flow rates for hot ends, so that end users don’t have to just rely on often-optimistic marketing numbers.

For those eager to dive deeper into the code and modelling, the project source is available on Github. We’ve featured all kinds of other useful hacks in this space lately, too, like our recent look at how to achieve wave overhangs. If you’ve got your own nifty 3D printing tools in the works, don’t hesitate to notify the tipsline.