Researchers at Cisco Talos are tracking a significant increase in phishing campaigns that abuse legitimate platforms. Attackers abused more than 25 legitimate services over the past year, including “collaboration, productivity, file-sharing, survey, payment and AI-related platforms.”

In two campaigns, attackers used order notifications from Staples and Dell to distribute phishing messages. The organizations themselves were not compromised, but the threat actors inserted phishing content into the fields that were supposed to contain shipping information.

During an incident, the most valuable intel is from people on the ground. Security teams rely on their colleagues across the organization to report issues quickly and without trying to fix things themselves.

Phishing attacks are increasingly using legitimate calendar invites to bypass security filters, according to researchers at Netcraft. Attackers send ICS calendar invite files that plant phishing lures directly on users’ calendars, often under the guise of work-related meetings.

The U.S. FBI and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) have issued joint advisories warning of election-themed scams targeting voters and spear phishing attacks targeting election officials.

Researchers at Malwarebytes warn that job seekers are increasingly vulnerable to scams as AI enables them to take a “spray-and-pray” approach to job applications.

Users who have automated their job application process are more likely to forget where they’ve applied, and an unsolicited message from a recruiter may seem more plausible. Job seekers can also be more willing to overlook or ignore red flags associated with scams, since they’re anxious to avoid missing an opportunity.

Researchers at Malwarebytes warn that a phishing campaign is using spoofed Calendly pages to trick users into handing over their Facebook and Google account credentials. The phishing sites pose as Calendly booking pages for job interviews at Meta, asking users to enter their information to sign up for a phone call with a recruiter.

Researchers at Fortra are tracking a surge in phishing attacks targeting bank accounts via remote monitoring and management (RMM) tools.

A phishing campaign is targeting YouTubers with phony sponsorship offers, according to researchers at ESET. The emails are personalized to each target, making specific references to their channels, and are designed to trick users into granting access to their Google accounts.

In part one of this NIS2 series, we examined why vendor questionnaires fall short and how third-party breaches impact downstream organizations across Europe. But what happens after a supplier containment phase ends? The long-term danger lies in how attackers leverage exfiltrated supplier data to launch hyper-targeted social engineering attacks against an organization’s employees.

"Someone online shows a 'trick' that feels harmless at first. Then the community pulls you in. Everyone's doing it. It feels like skill, not crime."

A young person from South Africa, describing how their peers slide into cybercrime.

Welcome back, aspiring pentesters!

Social engineering is one of the most important parts of pentesting, and in many real attacks it’s the part that decides whether the whole operation succeeds or fails. Sometimes it even makes the technical side easier. 

Earlier we looked at BadUSB attacks and several persistence methods, and those examples already showed how much can be done when a person simply plugs in a device or follows a convincing instruction. In a pentest, you can achieve real impact after just walking into an office and interacting with the environment without breaking into the corporate network remotely and hoping some serious vulnerability was left unpatched.

Many pentesters are stronger with systems than with people in everyday life. That’s one reason they gravitate toward technical work. Social engineering forces them to step out of that comfort zone even further. But understanding how people make decisions is a practical skill. When you design a scenario with human behavior in mind, the success rate of your interactions can rise. That’s why both red teams and blue teams will benefit from it. 

Evolutionary Legacy

The brain is an old application. It’s software that has been running for thousands of years. New features have been added over time, but the core logic was never fully rewritten. Different developers came and went. Some old functions were never documented. Some code paths were never reviewed. The system kept growing, but the original structure remained inside it.

That is a pretty good description of the human brain.

Our brains are the result of evolution, and the most vulnerable mechanisms are often the oldest ones. These mechanisms helped our ancestors survive in situations where there was no time for deep analysis. We cannot delete that legacy. We can only learn to control it at a higher level of thinking. But the older layer is still there, and every person remains vulnerable to it in the right conditions.

Who Is More Vulnerable?

If you follow the media, you might get the impression that older people are always the easiest targets. Stories about elderly victims are emotionally powerful, so they get more attention. But that does not mean the data supports the stereotype in a simple way. Europol statistics on fraud victims who reported to the police show that the 18-34 age group made up 27.7 percent of victims, the 35-54 group 23.4 percent, the 55-64 group 21.7 percent, and the 65+ group 18.5 percent. That already shows that younger adults are very much in the picture. And that is only the official reporting side.

Age itself does not seem to make a person automatically more or less likely to be deceived. Cognitive ability also does not give the protection many people assume. A joint study by several American universities involving 1,220 participants found no meaningful correlation between cognitive ability and the likelihood of becoming a fraud victim. So being smart does not make you immune. Even very intelligent people can be tricked. Paul Frampton, a respected particle physicist and Nobel Prize candidate, was caught in a simple dating scam that led him to attempt to carry cocaine across a border. That case became famous not because he was foolish, but because it showed that intelligence alone does not protect a person from manipulation.

Vulnerable Optimization

The human brain has barely changed in size for thousands of years, but the amount of information we ask it to process has exploded. An ancient Greek farmer had roughly our brain and a tiny fraction of our information load. Today we face constant messages, deadlines, alerts, meetings, and decisions.

To cope, the brain optimizes. One of its oldest shortcuts is stereotypical sequential behavior (SPB). I’ve seen something like this before, so I’ll react quickly instead of thinking it through. This saves energy and speeds up decisions, which was vital for our ancestors since a fast response to danger could save a life. It’s the short route in thinking, faster and cheaper than analysis, and usually good enough.

Giving a logical reason can raise the success rate, but surprisingly, even a meaningless reason works almost as well. The brain didn’t evaluate the explanation, it simply reacted to the fact that one existed.

Brain DoS

One of the easiest ways to force the brain into this energy-saving mode is to overwhelm it.

Emotional overload is one method. If someone triggers fear, stress, panic, or even strong excitement, they reduce the victim’s ability to think clearly. A frightened person doesn’t evaluate things carefully. They react, and that reaction is often automatic. Positive excitement can work too.

Hackers try to flood the brain with too much information from too many channels at once. A person trying to write a document, answer messages, listen to a coworker, and process notifications in the background will burn out mentally pretty fast. In that state, analysis gets difficult and the brain starts skipping into automatic behavior. That’s why overload is such a powerful social engineering tool. It pushes people away from deliberate thinking and into fast reaction.

Most Common Psychological Exploits

The psychology of influence contains many principles, and they show up everywhere, in marketing, advertising, sales, politics, therapy, and more. But for a hacker writing a phishing email or planning a phone script, only a few of these tend to matter most.

The three big ones are authority, scarcity, and consistency.

Principle of Authority

People naturally trust experts in areas where they themselves aren’t experts. If someone appears qualified, successful, wealthy, or powerful, we tend to listen. That’s part of how we navigate the world.

The real vulnerability is that authority can be faked.

People use white coats on television to sell toothpaste. So-called success coaches pose in front of expensive cars or Dubai skyscrapers to create an illusion of status. Well-known restaurant chains use actors from popular TV shows to advertise food. That’s exactly how fake authority works. The external costume creates the internal belief.

The Milgram experiment is a good demonstration of this. In 1963, participants were willing to obey an authority figure even when it made them uncomfortable and conflicted with their own moral instincts. The lesson is that authority has a very real psychological effect. Evolution plays a part here too. Human society developed through division of labor, and that made us more dependent on specialists. We got used to trusting experts. Hackers abuse that instinct all the time.

Here’s an example of a phishing email that appears to come from a manager and can’t be ignored.

Principle of Scarcity

Scarcity is about the fear of missing out. People value things more when they are rare, limited, or disappearing. A product that says “only three left” feels more urgent. A limited-time offer feels more valuable. Even when the item is not actually better, scarcity makes it feel that way. This is an old human pattern. Imported or hard-to-find goods often seem more valuable than ordinary local alternatives, even when they are not objectively better. The absence of abundance created desirability.

Principle of Consistency

Consistency is one of the least obvious but most effective manipulation principles. 

People prefer to be consistent with their earlier actions and statements. Society rewards consistency. A person who constantly changes their opinion is often viewed as unreliable or weak. A person who follows through is seen as stable and trustworthy. That social pressure matters a lot.

The problem is that being consistent is not the same as being correct. Once a person takes an initial step, they often become more willing to continue in the same direction. That saves mental energy and reduces self-doubt. It also fits the brain’s tendency to follow a behavioral script instead of starting analysis from scratch each time. Patricia Pliner’s study showed this clearly. Participants who first wore a badge supporting cancer research were later much more willing to donate to the cause. The first small commitment made the second one easier.

When a victim has already made a small commitment, continuing becomes easier than stopping.

Exploitation

To turn these principles into real social engineering operations hackers build scenarios. That scenario is most effective in a phone call, because a call allows hackers to guide the victim step by step and react to hesitation. Email phishing can also use these ideas, but the room for dynamic adaptation is smaller. The best phishing messages are not necessarily the loudest. They are the ones that fit the target’s mental state at the exact moment of delivery.

Emails and the 7% rule

In many social engineering assessments, a pattern appears again and again. When you send a large batch of phishing emails, a certain percentage of recipients will almost always act. The exact figure changes by organization, but the baseline rarely disappears.

Even when companies train users, run simulations and repeat awareness courses, there is often still a small percentage of people who click or respond. Why? Because at that moment, some of them are tired, stressed, busy, distracted or simply overloaded. At that moment, the person does not reach the analysis stage.

That is why training alone is not enough. Training helps, but it does not eliminate the human condition.

The most effective emails are often the ones that trigger stress or excitement directly. A message that creates urgency or a strong emotional reaction can overpower careful thinking. Once that happens, hackers move into the next steps.

Trigger Bypass Techniques

Most people have simple mental triggers that hold up even under pressure. The trick is that attackers can sometimes bypass those triggers by shifting the context.

A person might say they never share passwords. But that rule can get bypassed if the attacker presents a password generator, an IT support request, or a command they’re told to run for verification. The target can still believe they’re following their rule, even while being manipulated out of it. Verification habits can also be bypassed with fake signatures, familiar names, or a two-step sequence that starts with something safe. A short first interaction lowers suspicion, and then a second one carries the real pressure. That’s often more effective than starting aggressively. Company rules can be bypassed by changing the frame. A USB drive disguised as a personal gift feels different from an unknown device dropped on a desk. The same object reads very differently depending on the story around it.

That’s why social engineering isn’t about one universal trick. It’s about adapting the story to the trigger.

Protection

For companies, the best defense is a mix of organizational measures, technical controls, and incident response. Training lowers the success rate of simple attacks. Technical controls reduce the damage when someone does make a mistake. And since no defense is perfect, response procedures matter too. Organizations need to know what to do when a suspicious message, call, or request slips through.

Individuals should not be afraid to refuse. Don’t feel obligated to be polite when something feels wrong. If a call creates stress, stop and think instead of reacting automatically. Never make important decisions while overwhelmed. Learn to recognize manipulation patterns, and don’t keep a suspicious conversation going just because the other side sounds official.

Sometimes the safest choice is just to hang up.

Summary

There’s no guaranteed technique for success, and no guaranteed protection either. Human beings are vulnerable because evolution made us efficient, not perfect. That efficiency helps us survive, but it also gives social engineers a way in.

To reduce the probability of these attacks, we offer our Security Awareness and Risk Management training for companies. For pentesters, we offer The Science and Art of Social Engineering, where Master OTW walks you through the tools and techniques needed to become an effective social engineer.

The post Social Engineering: Exploiting Human Psychology in Offensive Security first appeared on Hackers Arise.

91% of Americans have been targeted by a scam, and 17% have fallen victim to one, according to a new survey by Consumer Reports. Notably, 20% of respondents said the latest scam they encountered was personalized, indicating that attackers are increasingly using automation and public or leaked information to craft targeted phishing attacks.

Microsoft is tracking phishing campaigns that use various lures to deliver MSP360, a legitimate RMM tool that attackers are abusing to gain a foothold on compromised systems.

Researchers at ReliaQuest have observed a surge in voice phishing (vishing) and Microsoft Teams phishing over the past several months, particularly from extortion groups like ShinyHunters.

Ransomware attacks involving data theft have surged by 275% in 2026, according to a new report from Zscaler. Attackers exfiltrated more than 896.2 terabytes of data from victim organizations, more than seven times the amount stolen during the 2023–2024 reporting period.

The digital landscape faces a new and complex challenge: the rise of generative AI. While these tools offer incredible potential for innovation, they also provide malicious actors with sophisticated ways to deceive even the most vigilant users.

Researchers at Fortra are tracking a new variant of calendar phishing in which threat actors trick employees into sharing meeting links internally.

The attackers pose as prospective customers and contact non-sales employees, asking to be directed to a sales representative in order to discuss a business opportunity. The attacker then sends the employee a meeting link to forward to a sales contact.

A phishing campaign is targeting Google accounts with lures that promise free subscriptions to Anthropic’s Claude Max AI model, Malwarebytes warns.