Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

Next-Level Test for Secure Transportation Vehicle

9/11/26
SECURE TRANSPORTATION
Enable IntenseDebate Comments: 
Enable IntenseDebate Comments

With rockets propelling it down the sled track at Sandia National Laboratories, a semitrailer loaded with mock nuclear weapons slammed into a barrier. It took mere moments to complete the second and final full-scale crash test of the Mobile Guardian Transporter, a next-generation system that will carry nuclear weapons and other sensitive materials for the Department of Energy’s Office of Secure Transportation.

read more

U.S. Marine Corps base runs active shooter drill in Jacksonville

Marine Corps Support Facility Blount Island in Jacksonville, Florida, ran a four-hour active shooter and explosive threat exercise on September 3, testing how the installation and local first responders would handle a complex security emergency inside an occupied office building. The drill, called Exercise Urgent Response, combined Blount Island Command with Jacksonville fire and police, […]

Manhattan’s Flood Walls Are Almost Done. What Sill Mamdani Do Next?

9/3/26
COASTAL CHALLENGES
Enable IntenseDebate Comments: 
Enable IntenseDebate Comments

New York City has more than 500 miles of coastline. The city’s coastal zone is home to around 1 million people as well as billions of dollars of residential and commercial property, and no two miles of the waterfront are quite the same. The marshy areas of southern Queens, the housing projects in waterfront Brooklyn, and the towers of Manhattan’s Financial District are all vulnerable during high tides and major storm events, and each of these areas is vulnerable in a different way.

read more

Architectural intent is the cornerstone for the future of software security

With agentic AI further boosting productivity, human code review becomes a serious bottleneck. Developers need to move upstream, establishing the ground rules to ensure that AI plays by the rules. No matter how drastically artificial intelligence has changed the way software is created, human developers are still indispensable to the software development process. But the [...]

There is no Zero Trust in Zero Trust

In January, the Cloud Security Alliance asked security professionals how they handle the identities on which their AI systems run. Fewer than a quarter of organizations had a documented, formally adopted policy for creating or removing one. More than 16% do not track when a new identity is created at all. Those identities hold tokens [...]

A reverse image search platform exposed more than 9 million facial images

A publicly accessible database linked to reverse image search service ClarityCheck exposed more than nine million images, including photographs of adults, teenagers, and children. Cybersecurity researcher Jeremiah Fowler discovered the database, which was neither password-protected nor encrypted. It contained approximately 9,042,977 image files, amounting to 450.2GB of data. Most were stored in folders labeled “faces” [...]

The Hidden Risk in Data Transfer

Cybersecurity has become one of the most defining business challenges of recent times. Organisations have invested heavily in protecting their networks, securing cloud environments and strengthening identity and access management. At the same time, organisations are under increasing pressure to prove they are handling sensitive information securely, not just storing it safely but protecting it throughout its journey.

Yet despite this progress, one area continues to receive far less attention than it deserves: how data is shared.

Most organisations have become very good at protecting data while it is stored. Files are encrypted, key handling is properly managed, access is restricted and systems are monitored around the clock. However, once that information needs to leave the organisation, whether it’s being sent to a customer, supplier, auditor or business partner, the controls often become less robust.

Every day, organisations exchange contracts, financial information, employee records, legal documents and commercially sensitive files. More often than not, this happens via email attachments or cloud-based file-sharing services because they are familiar and convenient. The problem is that convenience does not always equal security.

Email remains one of the most common routes for cyber attacks. Phishing, spoofed domains, malicious attachments and business email compromise continue to account for a significant proportion of successful breaches. However, most incidents do not involve a sophisticated bad actor. The official UK annual Cyber Security Breaches Survey continues to show the majority of incidents stem from everyday mistakes.  An email sent to the wrong recipient, an attachment forwarded outside the organisation or a file shared with overly broad permissions can expose sensitive information in seconds.

Human error remains one of the biggest cyber risks organisations face, particularly as businesses become increasingly connected. Information now flows constantly between employees, customers, suppliers, consultants and regulators. Every transfer creates another opportunity for something to go wrong.

What is often overlooked is that securing data is not just about protecting where it is stored. It is also about understanding the journey it takes.

Many organisations assume that because they operate in the UK, their sensitive information remains within UK borders. In reality, emails and attachments may be routed through multiple countries and cloud infrastructures before arriving at their destination. While this is often an invisible part of modern digital communications, it raises important questions around governance, compliance and data sovereignty.

For organisations operating in regulated sectors, this matters. Financial services firms, local authorities, healthcare providers and legal organisations are increasingly expected to demonstrate not only that data is protected, but also that it is managed responsibly throughout its entire lifecycle. Knowing where information is stored is only part of the picture. Understanding where it travels, who has access to it and how it is controlled has become equally important.

This is why conversations around geofencing and data sovereignty are gaining momentum. Rather than simply encrypting information and hoping for the best, organisations are beginning to ask whether they should have greater control over where sensitive data is permitted to travel. If businesses routinely place restrictions on the movement of physical assets, it seems only logical that they should apply similar thinking to digital information.

At the same time, regulators and auditors are asking more searching questions about how organisations exchange information with third parties. They want to understand how access is controlled, whether there is a complete audit trail and what safeguards exist once information leaves the organisation. These are no longer technical questions reserved for IT teams. They are governance issues that increasingly involve compliance, procurement, risk and senior leadership.

There is also a growing disconnect between the way organisations work and the security controls they have in place. Hybrid working, cloud collaboration and increasingly complex supply chains mean information rarely stays within a single organisation. Yet many businesses continue to rely on processes that were designed for a very different way of working.

This is where a change in mindset is needed.

Cybersecurity should not end when a document is saved securely on a server or in the cloud. Information is often at its most vulnerable when it is moving between people, organisations and systems. Protecting data in transit should therefore be considered just as important as protecting data at rest.

That does not mean making it harder for employees to do their jobs. Quite the opposite. Security should support the way people work, allowing information to be shared safely without creating unnecessary barriers or encouraging workarounds that introduce even greater risk.

Organisations need to take a more holistic view of information security. Protecting sensitive data means understanding its entire lifecycle, from creation and storage through to sharing, collaboration and eventual deletion. It means knowing not only who can access information, but where that information is travelling and whether that journey aligns with the organisation’s security, compliance and governance obligations.

Threats aren’t standing still, and neither are regulators. Focusing only on data that’s sitting in storage means missing one of the biggest holes in your security. It’s not enough to just lock data away; it needs to stay safe wherever it travels.

*DOQEX provides a secure data exchange and email gateway platform that helps businesses protect confidential information.

 

The post The Hidden Risk in Data Transfer appeared first on IT Security Guru.

Hacker Claims Millions of Records Stolen From Azure Tenants

A threat actor is claiming to have stolen millions of employee records from the Microsoft Azure environments of several major companies, raising concerns that the information could be used to launch targeted phishing, impersonation, and privilege escalation attacks.

The threat actor, known as “TheHatman,” has reportedly posted internal employee directories belonging to companies including McDonald’s, Vodafone, Kyndryl, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), HCL Technologies, InterContinental Hotels Group, Gap, Hexaware Technologies, and Wyndham Hotels for sale on cybercrime forums.

According to various sources, samples of the data contained corporate email addresses and fields consistent with standard Azure directory exports. However, the exact method used to gain access remains unconfirmed.

Researchers said compromised credentials linked to many of the affected organisations had previously circulated following infostealer infections. Possible routes into the environments include stolen session tokens, phishing, weak MFA protections, or third-party integrations with excessive permissions.

Employee data creates a roadmap for attackers

The allegedly stolen information includes employee IDs, job titles, departments, reporting structures, group memberships, service accounts, and, in some cases, details of Global Administrator accounts.

Cian Heasley, Principal Consultant at Acumen Cyber, warned that information that initially appears relatively harmless can provide the foundations for further attacks.

“Names, job titles, phone numbers, service account labels, and global administrator identities are precisely the precursors required to build convincing spear-phishing, phone based social engineering and helpdesk request employee impersonation attacks against higher value accounts or systems,” Heasley said.

He also warned against dismissing older employee information as irrelevant.

“Enterprise org charts change slowly, service account naming conventions rarely change and historic breached data dumps can remain useful for aiding in the planning and execution of new attacks years after the original compromise took place.”

TCS has said it found no credible evidence that its systems or customer environments were breached. The company said the referenced information appeared to be more than four years old and limited to basic employee details.

Stolen credentials put cloud environments at risk

Muhammad Yahya Patel, vCISO and Cybersecurity Advisor for EMEA at Huntress, said the incident demonstrates how infostealer infections can ultimately lead to cloud compromise.

“Infostealers harvesting credentials from corporate devices, those credentials landing in criminal marketplaces, and a threat actor using them to access cloud environments that trusted those credentials without adequate verification. Same playbook. Different logos on the breach notification.”

Patel said cloud identity infrastructure is only as secure as the credentials and devices accessing it.

“Conditional access policies, continuous access evaluation, device compliance checks, and real-time credential compromise detection are the controls that close the gap between ‘credentials stolen by an infostealer’ and ‘attacker inside your cloud environment.'”

He described the employee information reportedly being sold as a “precision targeting kit” for spear phishing and executive impersonation.

Valid credentials should not mean unrestricted data access

Simon Pamplin, CTO at Certes, said the incident also raises questions about what attackers can do once legitimate credentials have been compromised.

“Stolen credentials should not automatically mean stolen data. That is the real issue with this campaign,” Pamplin said.

“The reported ability to use compromised credentials to extract huge volumes of information from enterprise cloud environments shows what can happen when successful authentication is effectively treated as permission to access and move data.”

Pamplin argued that organisations need to assume credentials will sometimes be stolen and ensure that compromising an identity does not automatically make sensitive information readable.

“Cloud security needs to separate identity from control of the data itself. Sensitive data flows should be independently encrypted, segmented and governed so that compromising an account does not provide unrestricted movement across the environment.”

The incident also carries potential supply chain implications. Heasley pointed to the presence of major IT service providers among the organisations named, warning that businesses should review which suppliers hold privileged access to their environments.

The case is also a reminder that data theft does not always arrive with a ransom demand. In this instance, the threat actor appears to be attempting to sell the information directly, meaning affected organisations may only become aware of the theft once their data surfaces on criminal forums.

The post Hacker Claims Millions of Records Stolen From Azure Tenants appeared first on IT Security Guru.

Research Uncovers Hidden Patterns in Hurricane Storm Surge

8/14/26
HURRUCANES
Enable IntenseDebate Comments: 
Enable IntenseDebate Comments

When a hurricane roars toward land, forecasters try to predict how high sea levels will rise to help coastal communities prepare for the worst impacts.

But storm surge peak isn’t always the biggest problem. How fast water rises, how long it remains elevated, and how quickly it recedes all influence coastal erosion, infrastructure damage, emergency response, and recovery — and these factors can vary dramatically from storm to storm.

read more

❌