❌

Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

Ripple And Arf Target The Short Funding Gap Behind Cross-Border Payments

A payment can move across a blockchain in seconds while the company delivering it remains short of cash for days. Ripple’s new arrangement with Arf targets that funding mismatch, using RLUSD to supply working capital to licensed payment businesses.

TL;DR
  • Arf announced RLUSD settlement financing on the XRP Ledger on October 22.
  • The lending is designed to cover short gaps while cross-border payments settle.
  • A later move to native XRPL lending remains conditional on protocol amendments.

The product finances the wait between payment legs

In its announcement, Arf describes short-duration liquidity typically repaid within one to five days. Its reported $10 billion in annual settlement activity refers to the wider existing business; it is not the amount of a new RLUSD loan pool or a disclosed commitment to buy XRP.

A simple example explains the need. A remittance company may owe a recipient money today but receive the corresponding settlement tomorrow. Faster transmission of the payment instruction does not supply the missing funds. Temporary financing can bridge that gap, provided the lender understands who will repay and when.

That is why loan underwriting remains important even when the asset moves on a public ledger. A blockchain can provide a record of a transfer. It cannot, by itself, establish the quality of a borrower’s business, whether its receivables will arrive on time or whether a disputed payment will be reversed elsewhere.

The initiative develops the payment infrastructure theme in NewsBTC’s coverage of Ripple’s institutional financing business. Different products address different bottlenecks, so their volumes should not be combined into a single measure of network adoption.

RLUSD credit and XRP demand need separate measurements

Arf’s plan distinguishes direct financing from a later phase using native vault and lending capabilities. The underlying XRPL amendment process requires changes to gain validator support before activation. An integration built against a proposal is not proof that the proposed feature is operating on mainnet.

For readers following XRP, the distinction between the loan asset and network asset matters. Dollar-denominated principal measures credit extended. Transaction fees and account reserves measure different uses of the ledger. A large loan can move in a small number of transactions, so its face value should not be treated as equivalent demand for the native token.

NewsBTC’s reporting on SoFi’s separate deposit and stablecoin products and stablecoin payment activity points to a similar measurement problem. The instrument, outstanding balance and value transferred each describe a different part of the business.

The strongest evidence of success would be disclosed financing outstanding, repayment performance and actual payment corridors served. Reusing the same capital across successive short loans could support substantial volume without requiring an equally large permanent pool.

For now, the announcement establishes a commercial direction and a staged implementation plan. The useful question is how much dependable working capital reaches payment firms, and whether it arrives before the payout needs to happen.

Written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

Cross River Bank Adds Ripple’s RLUSD To Its Payment Infrastructure

TL;DR: Cross River Bank announced an integration of Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin into its Core Operating System on October 15. The bank aims to give fintech customers access to blockchain settlement alongside conventional payment rails.

A US bank is adding a stablecoin to the machinery it uses to move money for fintech customers. Cross River Bank said on October 15 that it is integrating Ripple USD, or RLUSD, into its proprietary Core Operating System, with support for the XRP Ledger.

The idea is to make on-chain settlement another available route rather than an entirely separate payment product. Businesses connecting through Cross River’s platform could use stablecoin rails alongside familiar systems such as ACH, wire transfers and other bank payment services.

On the XRP Ledger, transactions are designed to settle in roughly three to five seconds at costs that can be a fraction of a cent. Those network characteristics help explain why Ripple is pitching RLUSD for cross-border payments, merchant settlement and treasury transfers that do not fit neatly into traditional banking hours.

There is an important gap between blockchain transaction speed and the full time required to deliver money to an end recipient. Compliance reviews, currency conversion and the off-ramp back into a bank account can all introduce additional steps.

For Cross River, which supplies financial infrastructure to other businesses, stablecoin support is part of a broader attempt to make different payment methods accessible through one integration. For Ripple, it gives RLUSD another path into regulated banking workflows.

Neither company described the deal as an overnight replacement for existing payment networks. The more realistic near-term picture is a bank adding another settlement tool, with actual adoption depending on which fintechs find it useful enough to integrate into their operations.

❌