Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

Quick Maths On STRC Buybacks: The Truth About Net Bitcoin Per Share and Accretion

Bitcoin Magazine

Quick Maths On STRC Buybacks: The Truth About Net Bitcoin Per Share and Accretion

Strategy initiated open-market repurchases of STRC last week (July 20 through July 26, 2026), buying 288,930 shares for ~$25 million at an average price of $86.52. Notably, the company bought no Bitcoin and continued to grow its cash reserve. 

So what is going on here? Why is the largest Bitcoin treasury company buying back its credit? 

Context 

In June 2026, STRC fell far below the $100 stated amount. Check out these two articles for some in depth analysis about what exactly happened: 

Last week’s STRC buyback follows Strategy’s Digital Credit Capital Framework, announced on June 29 in response to the June volatility, which authorized up to $1 billion of repurchases across STRC, STRF, STRD, and STRK. Likely because STRC is now viewed as Strategy’s flagship product, STRC was identified as the initial priority for these buybacks. 

Buyback logic starts with the position of MSTR common stock in the capital structure. Common equity owns the residual value after every senior claim has been satisfied. Strategy’s BTC and cash are its liquid assets. Debt and preferred stock sit ahead of MSTR. Strategy’s USD Reserve (read: cash) offset part of those senior claims. The common stock therefore represents the value left after subtracting debt and preferred stock from the bitcoin reserve and adding back available cash.

This is effectively Strategy’s recently introduced “Net Bitcoin Per Share” metric. Strategy’s current methodology calculates Net BTC by taking bitcoin holdings and subtracting the bitcoin-equivalent value of out-of-the-money convertible debt, other debt-like instruments, and outstanding perpetual preferred stock, then adding back the USD Reserve. Notice that this is exactly the same description as the prior paragraph! 

Net BTC is divided by fully diluted common shares to produce Net BPS. Strategy’s disclosures mark July 23 as the boundary for its revised mNAV methodology, which uses Net BPS as its denominator.

This metric gives MSTR investors a direct view of BTC economically attributable to common equity after senior claims. Gross Bitcoin Per Share can rise when Strategy issues more preferred stock or debt to buy bitcoin. Net Bitcoin Per Share captures the liability created alongside that bitcoin purchase, answering the question of how much bitcoin remains for common shareholders after the more senior investors in the capital structure are paid. 

Therefore, Net BPS provides a framework for measuring the accretive or dilutive effect of capital markets transactions on MSTR. Think of it as another new metric that investors may evaluate along with the existing metrics already being used. 

Ok, but why STRC buybacks? 

The answer is that retiring liabilities at below their notional values is accretive on a net BTC basis. 

Let’s consider a simple balance sheet with easy numbers to understand the basic mechanics.

Assume a company owns $100 million of BTC and carries $50 million of senior liabilities. Common equity is therefore a $50 million residual claim: 

$100 million assets –  $50 million liabilities = $50 million equity 

Now assume the company can retire those $50 million of liabilities for $40 million. It uses $40 million of its assets, leaving $60 million of assets and zero remaining liabilities. The common equity residual rises from $50 million to $60 million. 

$60 million assets –  $0 liabilities = $60 million equity 

The equity claim went from $50 million to $60 million. So spending $40 million to eliminate a $50 million claim creates $10 million of value for the residual owner (the common equity investor). 

The STRC repurchase follows the same structure. Strategy paid an average of $86.52 to retire a security with a $100 stated amount. Each repurchased share removed $100 from the preferred stock claim used in the company’s Net BTC calculation while consuming only $86.52 of capital. The $13.48 spread creates gross accretion to MSTR.

Strategy retired $28.893 million of STRC stated amount for about $24.998 million based on the reported average price. The difference equals approximately $3.895 million, and this value accrues to MSTR. 

(It’s worth mentioning that also related to this is STRC’s current 12% annualized dividend rate. Retiring $28.893 million of STRC stated amount also removes roughly $3.47 million of annual dividend requirements. Also consider that since STRC is still well below $100, the company likely will raise the dividend, meaning the actual annual dividend expense removed is likely higher.)

Conclusion 

Net BTC identifies the residual BTC owned by the common stock by considering all the senior liabilities which sit ahead. The STRC buyback is a move of financial engineering to improve the Net BTC per share metric of the company.

Disclaimer: This content was prepared on behalf of Bitcoin For Corporations for informational purposes only. It reflects the author’s own analysis and opinion and should not be relied upon as investment advice. Nothing in this article constitutes an offer, invitation, or solicitation to purchase, sell, or subscribe for any security or financial product. 

This post Quick Maths On STRC Buybacks: The Truth About Net Bitcoin Per Share and Accretion first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Allard Peng.

SpaceX Nasdaq-100 Entry Brings Bitcoin Exposure to Passive Index Investors

Bitcoin Magazine

SpaceX Nasdaq-100 Entry Brings Bitcoin Exposure to Passive Index Investors

Today (July 7, 2026) SpaceX formally joins the Nasdaq-100 Index. The inclusion comes just weeks after the company’s public debut and follows its disclosure of 18,712 BTC on the balance sheet. JPMorgan estimates that index rebalancing will drive approximately $4.3 billion in passive inflows from Nasdaq-100-tracking funds and ETFs.

This development is more than headline news. It creates a structural, rules-based channel for institutional capital to gain exposure to Bitcoin through a corporate treasury vehicle, without requiring active allocation decisions, new mandates, or direct cryptocurrency purchases.

For corporate treasury teams, capital allocators, and institutional investors evaluating Bitcoin on balance sheets, the move provides a clear data point on how the strategy can intersect with mainstream equity infrastructure.

The Mechanics of Structural Demand

Passive index funds and ETFs must hold securities in proportion to their index weighting. When a new component is added, these vehicles buy shares mechanically. In SpaceX’s case, the estimated $4.3 billion in inflows represents capital that will flow into the stock regardless of short-term views on Bitcoin or the broader crypto market.

SpaceX’s Bitcoin holdings, disclosed in regulatory filings at approximately $1.2 billion in fair value, now sit within one of the most widely held equity indices globally. This is distinct from direct Bitcoin ETF flows or voluntary corporate purchases. It is demand generated by index rules rather than discretionary conviction.

Combined with Tesla and Strategy, the Nasdaq-100 now contains three companies with material Bitcoin treasuries. While SpaceX’s initial weighting will be modest, the precedent matters: high-growth, high-visibility companies can bring Bitcoin exposure into institutional equity portfolios through existing governance and allocation frameworks.

Strategic Implications for Treasury and Allocation Decisions

Corporate Bitcoin strategies have historically been evaluated on two primary dimensions: balance sheet optionality and long-term value preservation. SpaceX’s inclusion introduces a third dimension, potential for structural equity demand tied to index membership.

For treasury operators, this suggests that Bitcoin holdings, when paired with strong underlying business fundamentals, can contribute to broader market visibility and liquidity. Index inclusion often correlates with increased analyst coverage, improved trading volumes, and easier access to capital markets.

For institutional allocators, the development offers a form of Bitcoin beta that fits within traditional equity sleeves. Many large investors already maintain significant Nasdaq-100 exposure through passive mandates. SpaceX’s addition layers incremental Bitcoin exposure into those portfolios without requiring changes to investment policy statements or new product approvals.

This aligns with patterns observed across the corporate treasury landscape. Public companies now collectively hold more than 1.26 million BTC. The strategy is expanding beyond dedicated Bitcoin-focused entities into diversified operating businesses. SpaceX’s move illustrates how the approach can scale into the core of institutional equity markets.

Hypothetical Case Study: Modeling Indirect Bitcoin Demand

To illustrate the mechanism, consider a simplified hypothetical involving a public company that adopts a Bitcoin treasury strategy and later gains meaningful index attention.

Assumptions (illustrative only):

  • Company market capitalization: $12 billion
  • Bitcoin holdings: 8,000 BTC at $63,000 per BTC = $504 million
  • Bitcoin as a percentage of market cap: ~4.2%
  • The company is added to a major equity index, triggering $800 million in passive inflows over time (scaled-down version of larger index events for clarity)

Step-by-step impact:

  1. Passive funds purchase $800 million of the company’s stock to match index weighting.
  2. Because Bitcoin represents 4.2% of the company’s enterprise value in this example, roughly $33.6 million of the passive inflows can be viewed as indirectly supporting the Bitcoin portion of the balance sheet ($800M × 4.2%).
  3. At current prices, this equates to approximately 533 BTC of effective demand created through equity market mechanics rather than direct cryptocurrency purchases.
  4. If the company’s Bitcoin holdings generate ongoing yield or optionality (through lending, collateralization, or strategic use), the passive capital provides a form of “free” liquidity support to the treasury strategy.

While the numbers are simplified and depend on actual market cap, weighting, and Bitcoin valuation at the time of inclusion, the directional point is clear: index membership can create sustained, non-discretionary buying interest that benefits the Bitcoin component of the balance sheet proportionally.

Treasury teams evaluating this path should model similar scenarios using their own projected holdings, target market capitalization, and relevant index weighting assumptions. The exercise highlights how Bitcoin treasury decisions can interact with traditional equity market dynamics in ways that pure cryptocurrency allocations do not.

Looking Ahead

SpaceX’s Nasdaq-100 entry is one data point in a broader evolution. Corporate Bitcoin adoption is moving from early experimentation toward integration with established financial infrastructure. Passive flows, index rules, custody solutions, and regulatory clarity are all contributing to this shift.

For organizations actively building or evaluating Bitcoin treasury capabilities, developments like this reinforce the importance of treating Bitcoin as a strategic balance sheet asset with multiple potential transmission channels into institutional capital markets.Key questions for treasury and allocation teams to consider:

  • How would index inclusion (or the potential for it) factor into your company’s capital allocation framework?
  • What disclosure and governance standards are becoming necessary as Bitcoin treasuries intersect with passive equity vehicles?
  • For allocators: Does exposure through high-quality corporate treasuries warrant a distinct analytical lens alongside direct Bitcoin or ETF holdings?

The corporate Bitcoin strategy continues to mature. Events that embed Bitcoin exposure within widely tracked equity indices represent one of the more durable forms of institutional adoption currently unfolding.

Disclaimer: This content was prepared on behalf of Bitcoin For Corporations for informational purposes only. It reflects the author’s own analysis and opinion and should not be relied upon as investment advice. Nothing in this article constitutes an offer, invitation, or solicitation to purchase, sell, or subscribe for any security or financial product.

This post SpaceX Nasdaq-100 Entry Brings Bitcoin Exposure to Passive Index Investors first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Nick Ward.

❌