❌

Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

How the Internet of Things (IoT) became a dark web target – and what to do about it

By Antoinette Hodes, Office of the CTO, Check Point Software Technologies.

The dark web has evolved into a clandestine marketplace where illicit activities flourish under the cloak of anonymity. Due to its restricted accessibility, the dark web exhibits a decentralized structure with minimal enforcement of security controls, making it a common marketplace for malicious activities.

The Internet of Things (IoT), with the interconnected nature of its devices, and its vulnerabilities, has become an attractive target for dark web-based cyber criminals. One weak link – i.e., a compromised IoT device – can jeopardize the entire network’s security. The financial repercussions of a breached device can be extensive, not just in terms of ransom demands, but also in terms of regulatory fines, loss of reputation and the cost of remediation.

With their interconnected nature and inherent vulnerabilities, IoT devices are attractive entry points for cyber criminals. They are highly desirable targets, since they often represent a single point of vulnerability that can impact numerous victims simultaneously.

Check Point Research found a sharp increase inΒ cyber attacks targeting IoT devices, observing a trend across all regions and sectors. Europe experiences the highest number of incidents per week: on average, nearly 70 IoT attacks per organization.

WEF graphic

Gateways to the dark web

Based on research fromΒ PSAcertified, the average cost of a successful attack on an IoT device exceeds $330,000.Β Another analyst reportΒ reveals that 34% of enterprises that fell victim to a breach via IoT devices faced higher cumulative breach costs than those who fell victim to a cyber attack on non-IoT devices; the cost of which ranged between $5 million and $10 million.

Other examples of IoT-based attacks include botnet infections, turning devices into zombies so that they can participate in distributed denial-of-service (DDoS), ransomware and propagation attacks, as well as crypto-mining and exploitation of IoT devices as proxies for the dark web.

4% browsing, 90% confidentiality, 6% anonymity

The dark web relies on an arsenal of tools and associated services to facilitate illicit activities. Extensive research has revealed a thriving underground economy operating within the dark web. This economy is largely centered around services associated with IoT. In particular, there seems to be a huge demand for DDoS attacks that are orchestrated through IoT botnets: During the first half of 2023, Kaspersky identified over 700 advertisements for DDoS attack services across various dark web forums.

IoT devices themselves have become valuable assets in this underworld marketplace. On the dark web, the value of a compromised device is often greater than the retail price of the device itself. Upon examining one of the numerous Telegram channels used for trading dark web products and services, one can come across scam pages, tutorials covering various malicious activities, harmful configuration files with β€œhow-to’s”, SSH crackers, and more. Essentially, a complete assortment of tools, from hacking resources to anonymization services, for the purpose of capitalizing on compromised devices can be found on the dark web. Furthermore, vast quantities of sensitive data are bought and sold there everyday.

AI’s dark capabilities

Adversarial machine learning can be used to attack, deceive and bypass machine learning systems. The combination of IoT and AI has driven dark web-originated attacks to unprecedented levels. This is what we are seeing:

  • Automated exploitation:Β AI algorithms automate the process of scanning for vulnerabilities and security flaws with subsequent exploitation methods. This opens doors to large-scale attacks with zero human interaction.
  • Adaptive attacks:Β With AI, attackers can now adjust their strategies in real-time by analyzing the responses and defenses encountered during an attack. This ability to adapt poses a significant challenge for traditional security measures in effectively detecting and mitigating IoT threats.
  • Behavioral analysis: AI-driven analytics enables the examination of IoT devices and user behavior, allowing for the identification of patterns, anomalies, and vulnerabilities. Malicious actors can utilize this capability to profile IoT devices, exploit their weaknesses, and evade detection from security systems.
  • Adversarial attacks:Β Adversarial attacks can be used to trick AI models and IoT devices into making incorrect or unintended decisions, potentially leading to security breaches. These attacks aim to exploit weaknesses in the system’s algorithms or vulnerabilities.

Zero-tolerance security

The convergence of IoT and AI brings numerous advantages, but it also presents fresh challenges. To enhance IoT security and device resilience while safeguarding sensitive data, across the entire IoT supply chain, organizations must implement comprehensive security measures based on zero-tolerance principles.

Factors such as data security, device security, secure communication, confidentiality, privacy, and other non-functional requirements like maintainability, reliability, usability and scalability highlight the critical need for security controls within IoT devices. Security controls should include elements like secure communication, access controls, encryption, software patches, device hardening, etc. As part of the security process, the focus should be on industry standards, such as β€œsecure by design” and β€œsecure by default”, along with the average number of IoT attacks per organization, as broken down by region every week.

Functional requirements, non-functional requirements

Collaborations and alliances within the industry are critical in developing standardized IoT security practices and establishing industry-wide security standards. By integrating dedicated IoT security, organizations can enhance their overall value proposition and ensure compliance with regulatory obligations.

In today’s cyber threat landscape, numerous geographic regions demand adherence to stringent security standards; both during product sales and while responding to Request for Information and Request for Proposal solicitations. IoT manufacturers with robust, ideally on-device security capabilities can showcase a distinct advantage, setting them apart from their competitors. Furthermore, incorporating dedicated IoT security controls enables seamless, scalable and efficient operations, reducing the need for emergency software updates.

IoT security plays a crucial role in enhancing theΒ Overall Equipment EffectivenessΒ (a measurement of manufacturing productivity, defined as availability x performance x quality), as well as facilitating early bug detection in IoT firmware before official release. Additionally, it demonstrates a solid commitment to prevention and security measures.

By prioritizing dedicated IoT security, we actively contribute to the establishment of secure and reliable IoT ecosystems, which serve to raise awareness, educate stakeholders, foster trust and cultivate long-term customer loyalty. Ultimately, they enhance credibility and reputation in the market. Ensuring IoT device security is essential in preventing IoT devices from falling into the hands of the dark web army.

This article was originally published via the World Economic Forum and has been reprinted with permission.

For more Cyber Talk insights from Antoinette Hodes, please click here. Lastly, to receive stellar cyber insights, groundbreaking research and emerging threat analyses each week,Β subscribe to the CyberTalk.org newsletter.

The post How the Internet of Things (IoT) became a dark web target – and what to do about it appeared first on CyberTalk.

This data breach dumped thousands of files on the dark web

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Subscribe to our cybersecurity newsletter for the latest information.The 3D printing enterprise suffered a mass data breach, losing custody of 228,000 subscribers’ data. Although the breach occurred in October of 2020, breach notification provider β€˜Have I Been Pwned’ states that present circulation of this data in underground dark web communities could be problematic. The 3D printing group, known as Thingiverse, states that it is β€œtaking this matter very seriously.”

Why this data breach is significant

Thingiverse, whose parent company is MakerBot, was developed for the maker community, which sees enthusiastic participation in Silicon Valley and beyond. Thingiverse serves as a repository where β€˜makers’ can post 3D print model designs. As of two years ago, the platform reported more than two million registered users and facilitated more than 340 million object downloads. Since then, Thingiverse has expanded to new user populations and grown exponentially.

In addition to offering over 1.5 million design files, the site provides options for design customization via a Customizer tool, or via OpenSCAD. The platform also permits the uploading of models under the GNU General Public or Creative Commons licenses. In turn, the platform has transformed into a forum for certain kinds of creative types who wish to share and discuss work.

Nonetheless, the open nature of the platform renders it vulnerable to cyber breaches. In December of 2017, a bug within the comments section of the site enabled bad actors to quietly mine cryptocurrencies. The perpetrators leveraged the CPU power of visitors’ devices to solve certain mathematical problems required for mining Bitcoin and other forms of crypto.

This crypto mining episode in MakerBot’s history was eventually resolved. Security issues enabling the crypto mining were righted. User data was never compromised and those responsible for the hijacking were banned from the platform.

In contrast, the data breach at-hand involves 255 million lines of data and includes usernames, physical addresses and persons’ legal names.Β  As noted earlier, 228,000 pieces of data are involved. And, according to Troy Hunt, who runs Have I Been Pwned, β€œ228k is also just the unique *real email addresses*; on top of that are well over 2M addresses in the form of webdev+[username] @makerbot.com, alongside password hashes. The highest ID in the users table 2,857,418 so the scope is much bigger.”

Where to go from here

Cyber security expert Troy Hunt first received information about this data breach by another cyber aficionado. After investigating the information cache on October 1st of 2021, the pair verified its validity and identified the source of the issue. Shortly thereafter, MakerBot, the parent company for Thingiverse, was contacted directly.

The company did not provide a swift response to the security incident report, prompting the white hat cyber investigators to Tweet about the breach. A spokesperson for MakerBot stated that teams attribute the leak to an internal human error. Members of the Thingiverse community are encouraged to update passwords as a precautionary measure. MakerBot also apologized for the incident and regrets any user inconveniences.

In conclusion

Cyber security breaches are growing increasingly common. In the past decade, more than 4 billion records have been stolen or leaked. A data breach can happen within any organization. Get breach prevention insights here. Also, be sure to read our article titled How to Improve Security After a Data Breach. Lastly, for more cyber security and business insights, analysis and resources, sign up for theΒ Cyber Talk newsletter.

Β 

The post This data breach dumped thousands of files on the dark web appeared first on CyberTalk.

❌