Third-party penetration testing means two different things: testing your own organization through an independent provider, and testing or reviewing testing on a supplier, partner, or acquisition target. This guide focuses on the second use case. It works best as a governed risk process, not a document request, built on clear authorization, risk-based scope, defensible evidence, and contractual follow-up.

The post Third-Party Penetration Testing: What Security and Procurement Teams Need to Know appeared first on Synack.

The core components required to move from automated discovery to proven risk now exist: capable models, controlled execution, scalable orchestration, evidence capture and human judgement. The opportunity is to engineer them as one dependable system rather than treat each as a standalone feature.

The post AI Can Find Vulnerabilities. Building a System That Proves Risk Is the Hard Part. appeared first on Synack.

You know what you spent on penetration testing last year. But can you explain what that investment covered between engagements? For many organizations the honest answer is that it covered the weeks the testers were working against a scope agreed before they started. That was a reasonable arrangement when systems changed a few times a year. It is worth revisiting, now that many of them change weekly.

The post Offensive Security Is Becoming a Program, Not a Purchase appeared first on Synack.

Expert judgment is the scarcest resource in offensive security. Making it accessible to more of the world, continuously, is an engineering problem.

The post Putting Experts on the Problems Only Experts Can Solve appeared first on Synack.

Most security leaders can report what they spent on bug bounty last year. Far fewer can understand the value being delivered by proving what it actually tested. Open programs show which bugs were reported, not which assets received real, skilled attention. Managed bug bounty closes that gap. Researcher-hour and traffic analytics turn testing depth into evidence you can measure, not an assumption you have to trust, giving you coverage you can hand to a board, an auditor, or a compliance team.

The post Managed Bug Bounty: Why Provable Coverage Beats Blind Spend appeared first on Synack.

The critical RufRoot vulnerability gave unauthenticated attackers a path from an exposed MCP endpoint to shell access, stolen AI provider keys and poisoned agent memory. Paul Mote explains why the incident should change how security teams define, test and recover their AI attack surface.

The post RufRoot Exposed the Hidden AI Agent Attack Surface appeared first on Synack.

Europe regulates AI through risk tiers and conformity checks. America accelerates AI through deregulation and infrastructure speed. Both models ask different questions but land on the same gap: neither tells you whether a live AI system actually holds up against real attacks. Enterprise AI security depends on evidence, not paperwork or policy. Continuous, human-validated offensive testing is the layer that both regulatory philosophies are missing and that every organization operating across borders actually needs.

The post Europe Is Regulating AI. America Is Accelerating AI. Both Need Offensive Security Validation. appeared first on Synack.

America's AI Action Plan puts speed at the center of federal AI policy, reducing regulatory friction and accelerating adoption across government and industry. That same speed expands the AI attack surface just as fast, through new agents, APIs, and tool-calling chains shipped every week. Point-in-time pentests and quarterly assessments cannot keep pace with systems that change that often. AI security testing needs to run continuously and be backed by human-validated evidence.

The post America’s AI Action Plan Is About Speed: AI Security Needs to Keep Up appeared first on Synack.

The EU AI Act's security requirements go beyond governance documentation and AI literacy training. High-risk AI systems need adversarial testing to prove they can withstand real attacks. Policies describe intent. Testing produces evidence.

The post The EU AI Act Is Not Just a Compliance Deadline; It’s a Security Validation Challenge appeared first on Synack.

America’s AI Action Plan puts speed at the center of federal AI policy, reducing regulatory friction and accelerating adoption across government and industry. That same speed expands the AI attack surface just as fast, through new agents, APIs, and tool-calling chains shipped every week. Point-in-time pentests and quarterly assessments cannot keep pace with systems that […]

The post America’s AI Action Plan Is About Speed: AI Security Needs to Keep Up appeared first on Synack.

The EU AI Act’s security requirements go beyond governance documentation and AI literacy training. High-risk AI systems need adversarial testing to prove they can withstand real attacks. Policies describe intent. Testing produces evidence. Security teams that add structured adversarial testing to their AI compliance programs will have something governance documentation alone cannot produce: demonstrated assurance. […]

The post The EU AI Act Is Not Just a Compliance Deadline — It’s a Security Validation Challenge appeared first on Synack.