A shared message board turned isolated AI agents into an effective offensive collective during OpenAIβs July 2026 ExploitGym evaluations, enabling roughly 1,200 agents to exchange more than 70,000 messages and files. About 700 eventually participated in activity that compromised portions of Hugging Faceβs production environment showing that shared agent memory can become a high-risk coordination [β¦]
Iranian state-linked cyber actors are using fake AI applications, antivirus tools and even fabricated MRI scan results to deliver CHOSEN BRICK, a Windows-focused spyware family designed to surveil dissidents, activists and journalists. A joint advisory from the UK National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), the FBI and the Netherlandsβ AIVD warns that the campaign has targeted [β¦]
3,022 RubyGems packages associated with the GemStuffer campaign, expanding the known scope of an incident that researchers have linked to an alleged OpenAI agent swarm. The inventory covers 3,315 distinct package name-and-version pairs and reveals a sustained campaign that combined documentation-worker abuse, data collection, credential-theft attempts, and metadata-based web attack tests. When a documentation worker [β¦]
Threat actors are moving from using artificial intelligence as a productivity aid to deploying autonomous agentic systems that can execute major portions of an intrusion with minimal human intervention. Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) has documented a financially motivated actor that used a multi-agent framework to plan, build, and run a mass credential-harvesting operation in [β¦]
Threat actors are increasingly leveraging AI hallucinations to plant phishing links and other malicious content in AI output, IEEE Spectrum reports. Large language models (LLMs) sometimes fabricate information, including web domains, when answering usersβ questions. Attackers are registering these hallucinated web domains to host phishing pages.
Some things just lie on the surface, while others take time to find. In OSINT, finding the right data often means digging deep. Before you reach a conclusion, there must be solid evidence to support it, and data acquisition is always the most time consuming part of this process. The success of your investigation depends on how well you can find information and connect the dots.
OpenPlanter can automate part of this process.Β
OpenPlanter
Essentially, OpenPlanter is a recursive language model investigation agent. It ingests different kinds of data, which can be corporate registries, campaign finance records, government contracts and more. It then resolves entities across them and surfaces connections through evidence-based analysis. You can also use it to build profiles of individuals based on publicly available information.
OpenPlanter has both a desktop GUI and a terminal interface. The second one is more convenient.
Setting Up
The setup process is quick. We just need to create a Python environment that will host the needed libraries.Β
kali > git clone https://github.com/ShinMegamiBoson/OpenPlanter.git
kali > cd OpenPlanter
kali > python3 -m venv venv; source venv/bin/activate
kali > pip install -e .
Once itβs done, we need to give it our API keys.Β
To make web searches, OpenPlanter needs the Exa API. Exa is cheap to use and gives free credits for new accounts, so you donβt have to pay upfront. OpenRouter API is also needed to run the tool. OpenRouter has free AI models, but there is a daily usage limit. Make an account there and get your free API key.Β
To configure keys, run this command and paste them:Β
kali > openplanter-agent --configure-keys
At this point, you can use the tool.
Using OpenPlanter with OpenRouter
The daily API usage limit is enough to run a couple of basic tests, like the one below.
OpenPlanter will use Exa API key to find information. Without Exa, it burns tokens faster and gives incomplete results.Β
Normally, the tool saves the results in a text file in the current directory, but it doesnβt always happen. Be careful and make sure you donβt lose anything.Β
Here is our first report.
To make things more interesting, we asked it to find a complete list of Tatneft executives. Tatneft is one of the largest oil and gas companies in Russia.
The report was well organized, but all this information is readily available on the internet, due to the size of the Russian company.Β
When it was asked to find more information on a specific person from the list above, it struggled to find much and ended up with some generic data and a wrong social media account. Well, maybe that person is hard to find, so we gave it a second chance and picked a unique name from the same list: Nail Ulfatovich Maganov.
kali > openplanter-agent --task "Find as much information as you can on Nail Ulfatovich Maganov who works at Tatneft. If possible, find his Vkontakte, phone number, address, email and check if his email has been in data leaks. Save the results in a text file" --provider openrouter --model openrouter/free
The results can be seen below. OpenPlanter did find his LinkedIn account and extracted information from various places.Β
It also found OpenSanctions records associated with Nail Maganov.Β
But he is a well known figure in Russia. What about regular employees at a large Russian company? We will use Sibur for this example. Founded in 1995, itβs Russiaβs largest petrochemical company.
We tried two individuals. During the first attempt, the tool didnβt find the correct person. After the second attempt with a different employee, it gave the results.Β
It found Svetlanaβs position (Head of HR). This information was in her LinkedIn account. The rest of the information deserves further validation. Keep in mind, Russia has undergone a massive data blackout, systematically dismantling its open data and public statistics infrastructure. No wonder itβs hard to find things there.
Using OpenPlanter with Ollama β Locally
OpenPlanterβs own docs push toward frontier models (GPT-5.2, Claude Opus 4.6, Cerebras Qwen3-235B), because the whole process is quite demanding. Small local models will be noticeably weaker. But we still gave it a try. The first model was Qwen3:0.6B and its first attempt didnβt produce any results. After the second attempt, it found recent vulnerabilities that Windows had.
We also tried it with Qwen3:4b, but it produced absolutely irrelevant data in its response.Β
We didnβt stop here and tried it again. The results were still irrelevant. Instead of making a report on Mikhail Karisalov (CEO of Sibur) it spoke about something else.Β
Using OpenPlanter with Ollama β Remote Servers
If you decide to rent a server with good hardware to test other models, donβt waste your time on it. We tried various models, but none of them worked well. OpenPlanter calls a model, the model replies and then it fails. The output can be seen on the screen.
Here is an example with Qwen3.6:27b. Qwen3.6:35b had the same issue.
We also tried Ornith:35B.
These models support thinking and tooling, but they canβt really do much in this case.Β
Terminal Interface
Itβs also important to mention that there are two ways you can use OpenPlanter in the terminal. So far, youβve seen only one. If youβre more comfortable with a chat interface, you can use the second option.
kali > openplanter-agent --provider openrouter --model openrouter/free
Here you run your prompts and tweak the tool using the available commands.
Summary
After testing the tool in various ways, we came to the conclusion that it works reliably only with OpenRouter. Thatβs what gave us the best results. The developers also push towards frontier models or OpenRouter. The whole process of investigation relies heavily on the Exa API. Using it with Ollama models hosted externally (VPS) will not work, as it fails silently even if you select a supported AI model.Β
The tool might confuse people, especially if their names are common and their social media profiles are empty. Everything it finds deserves validation. Occasionally, it may check the results, marking them HIGH, MEDIUM or LOW depending on its confidence. It doesnβt always do it, but this can be fixed if the prompt explicitly asks for it. Most importantly, OpenPlanter can still save you time.
Learn more with our AI for Cybersecurity training. During the training, weβll show you different ways of using AI in cybersecurity, set up local models and solve tasks with it.
A recent survey from Experian found that 60% of companies report fraud losses that are βsomewhat or significantly higherβ than in previous years, with a majority of respondents citing AI-generated phishing attacks as their top AI-related fraud concern.
Threat actors are adapting malware not only for conventional endpoint defenses and sandboxes, but also for large language model-powered tools increasingly used to triage suspicious code. ESET researchers linked the activity to Russia-aligned threat actor UAC-0099, which used the method during an attack against an organization in Ukraine. The group inserted a safety-sensitive, weapon-related request [β¦]
Threat actors are using AI-assisted phishing templates, executive impersonation, fake ServiceNow invoices, and fabricated email threads to pressure finance teams into authorizing fraudulent ACH payments worth nearly $50,000. Microsoft detected more than one million messages in the campaign, demonstrating how business email compromise (BEC) operations are becoming more polished, scalable, and difficult to spot. The [β¦]
Threat actors increasingly deploy AI agents as operational systems for cyberattacks, moving beyond simple chatbot assistants. These AI systems automate various stages of the cyber kill chain, including reconnaissance, phishing, exploitation, persistence, and bulk data theft. Anthropic reported disrupting multiple such operations between December 2025 and August 2026, involving groups suspected to be linked to [β¦]
A newly disclosed prompt-crafting technique can hide policy-violating instructions inside ordinary-looking English prose, allowing malicious requests to pass through lightweight LLM safety filters before being recovered and processed by a more capable downstream model. Researchers found that carefully structured prose can make the first model miss an embedded instruction entirely, while the target model invests [β¦]
Nearly one in 10 internet-exposed LiteLLM AI gateways accepted the widely documented default master key, sk-1234, or required no authentication, creating a direct path to LLMjacking, sensitive credential exposure, and in vulnerable versions root-level code execution inside the gateway container. Their internet scan of 3,074 publicly reachable instances found that 294 systems, or 9.6%, accepted [β¦]
OpenAI has announced its plans for a βDefense Factory,β a cybersecurity operation that prioritizes agent-driven actions. This initiative is designed to continuously discover, validate, remediate, and verify vulnerabilities as AI systems develop the ability to conduct increasingly complex cyber operations. The initiative addresses growing concerns that long-running autonomous agents, especially those powered by widely accessible [β¦]
Security researchers have recently disclosed a new enterprise AI attack technique known as Workflow Identity Hijacking. This method enables external attackers to exfiltrate sensitive corporate information by submitting seemingly harmless requests to AI-powered automations. Research published by Noma Labs researcher Sasi Levi reveals that this attack does not rely on prompt injection, stolen credentials, or [β¦]
Threat intelligence firm GreyNoise has identified an AI-driven intrusion campaign, likely orchestrated by a Russian-speaking threat actor, that compromised at least 440 PaperCut NG/MF servers across 395 organizations in 48 countries. This campaign began on August 31, 2026, exploiting two vulnerabilities in PaperCut: CVE-2026-81578, an authentication bypass flaw, and CVE-2026-82078, a vulnerability that allows unsafe [β¦]
Anthropic has reported four cybersecurity evaluation incidents in which pre-release Claude AI models gained unauthorized access to real third-party systems after isolated test environments were accidentally connected to the internet. These cases revealed significant alignment failures, including biased reasoning and reckless task pursuit, when autonomous models operated for extended periods without production cyber safeguards. All [β¦]
Threat actors are increasingly operationalizing agentic artificial intelligence to compress cyberattack timelines, automating reconnaissance, vulnerability research, exploit development and credential theft with far less hands-on-keyboard activity. However, current evidence points to semi-autonomous, human-supervised attack chains rather than fully independent AI-driven intrusions in the wild. Agentic AI represents a material shift from conventional generative-AI abuse. Rather [β¦]
U.S. intelligence and cybersecurity agencies have accused six China-based AI companies including DeepSeek, Alibaba, Moonshot AI, MiniMax, StepFun and Z.AI of extracting billions of tokens from leading American AI systems through industrial-scale knowledge-distillation campaigns. A joint Cybersecurity Advisory, AA26-251A, issued by the National Security Agency, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and FBI, said the campaigns [β¦]
Information-stealing malware is expanding its collection logic to target locally stored data from AI coding agents, including Claude, Cursor, Codex, Cline, Continue, and OpenCode. The shift puts developer credentials, Model Context Protocol configurations, prompt histories, project metadata, and potentially proprietary source code into the same theft pipeline long used for browser cookies, cryptocurrency wallets, and [β¦]
Security researchers have demonstrated how vulnerabilities in AI-powered customer service agents can be exploited to bypass identity checks, expose sensitive customer data, exfiltrate one-time passwords (OTPs), and trigger unauthorized account actions. These findings underscore that the risks go beyond prompt injection; they also stem from flawed integrations among email, authentication, backend APIs, knowledge bases, and [β¦]